Dataset Information

Low Expression of ADCY4 Predicts Worse Survival of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Integrated Analysis and Immunohistochemical Verification.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The molecular mechanism underlying the carcinogenesis and development of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) has not been sufficiently elucidated. This analysis was performed to find pivotal genes and explore their prognostic roles in LUSC.

Methods

A microarray dataset from GEO (GSE19188) and a TCGA-LUSC dataset were used to identify differentially co-expressed genes through Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) and differential gene expression analysis. We conducted functional enrichment analyses of differentially co-expressed genes and established a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Then, we identified the top 10 hub genes using the Maximal Clique Centrality (MCC) algorithm. We performed overall survival (OS) analysis of these hub genes among LUSC cases. GSEA analyses of survival-related hub genes were conducted. Ultimately, the GEO and The Human Protein Atlas (THPA) databases and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results from the real world were used to verify our findings.

Results

A list of 576 differentially co-expressed genes were selected. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that regulation of vasculature development, cell-cell junctions, actin binding and PPAR signaling pathways were mainly enriched. The top 10 hub genes were selected according to the ranking of MCC scores, and 5 genes were closely correlated with OS of LUSC. Additionally, GSEA analysis showed that spliceosome and cell adhesion molecules were associated with the expression of GNG11 and ADCY4, respectively. The GSE30219 and THPA databases and IHC results from the real world indicated that although GNG11 was not detected, ADCY4 was obviously downregulated in LUSC tissues at the mRNA and protein levels.

Conclusions

This analysis showed that survival-related hub genes are highly correlated to the tumorigenesis and development of LUSC. Additionally, ADCY4 is a candidate therapeutic and prognostic biomarker of LUSC.

SUBMITTER: Liu Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8225293 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundN6-methyladenine (m6A) is the most common modification of mRNA and IncRNA in higher organisms. m6A has been confirmed to be related to the formation and progression of tumors and m6A-related genes can be used as prognostic biomarkers in a variety of tumors. However, there have been no similar studies on lung squamous cell carcinoma. The main purpose of this study was aimed to explore the differential expression of m6A-related genes in lung squamous cell carcinoma tissues and its relationship with patient clinical prognosis.MethodsWe integrated three m6A writers that catalyze the methylation of adenine on mRNA molecules. The training set including 501 patients with LUSC was collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the test set including 181 patients with LUSC was collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Based on the expression level of the m6A methylase gene, we established a tumor subgroup and risk-prognosis model to quantify the risk index and long-term patient prognosis, which were confirmed by principal component analysis (PCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. After lung squamous cell carcinoma tissue specimens were obtained during surgery, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to verify the results in vitro.ResultsThe results of the study showed that the expression of the three m6A methylases in tumor tissues and normal tissues was significantly different (P < 0.05). The survival-prognostic model based on METTL3 gene expression showed better predictive performance (AUC: 0.706). Patients in the high-risk and low-risk groups exhibited significant differences in terms of survival time and 5-year and 10-year survival rates. Immunohistochemistry revealed that patients with high METTL3 expression exhibited a longer survival time than those with low METTL3 expression.ConclusionsOur study showed that the molecular phenotype based on the expression of METTL3 may be an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of lung squamous cell carcinoma. These findings not only prove the important role of m6A methylase in lung squamous cell carcinoma, but are also expected to provide more accurate prognostic assessment and individualized treatment for patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Project description:BackgroundA number of genetic markers linked to familial pulmonary fibrosis predict differential survival in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. Although genetic testing is not performed routinely for ILD, family history commonly is obtained and may inform outcome risk.Research questionDoes survival vary between patients with and without self-reported familial pulmonary fibrosis?MethodsFamily history was acquired systematically for consecutive ILD patients who consented to clinical registry enrollment at the University of Texas Southwestern and the University of California at Davis. Patients were stratified by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF ILD diagnosis and were substratified by presence or absence of familial pulmonary fibrosis, defined as one or more additional affected family members. Transplant-free survival was compared using multilevel, mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsOf the 1,262 patients included, 534 (42%) had IPF ILD and 728 (58%) had non-IPF ILD. Of those with non-IPF ILD, 18.5% had connective tissue disease, 15.6% had chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and 23.5% had unclassifiable ILD. Familial pulmonary fibrosis was reported in 134 IPF ILD patients (25.1%) and 90 non-IPF ILD patients (12.4%). Those with familial IPF showed an 80% increased risk of death or transplantation compared with those with sporadic IPF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.37-2.37; P < .001), whereas those with familial non-IPF ILD showed a twofold increased risk compared with their counterparts with sporadic disease (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.46-2.96; P < .001). Outcome risk among those with familial non-IPF ILD was no different than for those with sporadic IPF ILD (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.89-1.84; P = .19).InterpretationPatient-reported familial pulmonary fibrosis is predictive of reduced transplant-free survival in IPF and non-IPF ILD patients. Because survival among patients with familial non-IPF ILD approximates that of sporadic IPF ILD, early intervention should be considered for such patients. Until clinical genetic testing is widely available and provides actionable results, family history should be ascertained and considered in risk stratification.