Dataset Information

Supernormal lung function and risk of COPD: A contemporary population-based cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Investigation of the natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has led to the recognition that individuals with higher than normal lung function may have lower risk of developing COPD. We tested the hypothesis that individuals with supernormal lung function have lower risk of COPD.

Methods

We followed 108,246 adults from the Copenhagen General Population Study recruited between 2003 and 2015 for clinical COPD outcomes until 2018. A subset of 16,892 attended another examination approximately 10 years later, allowing to investigate lung function decline and COPD development (forced expiratory volume in 1 se (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<0·70 and FEV₁<80% predicted with chronic respiratory symptom). Supernormal lung function was defined as FEV₁>upper limit of normal (ULN).

Findings

At baseline, 3944(4%) had supernormal lung function, 91,938(85%) normal lung function, and 12,364(11%) had below normal lung function. Individuals with baseline supernormal versus normal lung function had higher FEV₁ decline but did not differ in FEV₁/FVC decline. None had COPD at 10 years in those with supernormal lung function, while 3% had in those with normal lung function. Early-life risk factors associated with COPD development and smoking exposure in different stages of life were less common in individuals with supernormal lung function. Compared to individuals with normal lung function, multivariable adjusted hazard ratios in those with supernormal lung function were 0·19(95% confidence interval:0·08-0·46) for acute obstructive lung disease hospitalisations, 0·56(0·45-0·69) for pneumonia hospitalisations, and 0·81(0·72-0·91) for all-cause mortality.

Interpretation

Supernormal lung function is associated with lower risk of developing COPD.

Funding

Herlev and Gentofte Hospital and Lundbeck Foundation.

SUBMITTER: Colak Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8225980 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBoth the incidence of lung cancer and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) have been increasing worldwide. The relationship between MetS and lung cancer remains controversial.Research questionWhat is the risk of lung cancer associated with MetS and its components?Study design and methodsMultivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of MetS-related variables on lung cancer risk, both overall and by histologic subtype, in the UK Biobank. Stratified analyses were conducted by sex, tobacco use status, and use of medication. HR curves were used to test the nonlinear associations between the metabolic markers and the risk of lung cancer.ResultsOf the 331,877 participants included in this study, a total of 77,173 participants had a diagnosis of MetS at enrollment. During a median follow-up of 10.9 years, lung cancer as the primary site developed in 2,425 participants. The HRs of MetS were 1.21 (95% CI, 1.09-1.33), 1.28 (95% CI, 1.10-1.50), and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.94-1.44) for the overall risk of lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma, respectively. The HRs increased with the number of metabolic abnormalities from 1.11 to approximately 1.4 or 1.5 for those with one to five disorders. Positive association with lung cancer was observed for low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), elevated waist circumference, and hyperglycemia. The relationship between MetS and lung cancer was modified by sex, with a stronger effect in female patients (P = .031). The risk of lung cancer resulting from MetS was elevated mainly among individuals who used tobacco, although the modification effect of tobacco use was not statistically significant. A nonlinear association was found between lung cancer and HDL-C, waist circumference, and glycated hemoglobin.InterpretationThe increased risk of lung cancer associated with MetS suggests the importance of taking metabolic status and markers into consideration for the primary prevention of lung cancer and the selection of high-risk populations for lung cancer screening.