Dataset Information

Machine-assessed tar yield marketing on cigarette packages from two cities in South Korea.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

South Koreans continue to smoke at high rates. Tobacco manufacturers have a history of branding cigarettes with misleading descriptors including the introduction of low or ultra-low tar brand variants. The government bans traditional misleading descriptors (low, mild) but requires the presence of machine-assessed tar yields on cigarette packages. Literature suggests the presence of quantitative constituents can be misleading for smokers. We analyzed the machine-assessed tar value branding and the presence of additional branding that highlight tar levels on South Korean cigarette packs.

Methods

In August 2018, we analyzed 178 unique cigarette packs purchased in Seoul and Busan, South Korea using a systematic protocol. Cigarette packs were coded for tar levels and classified as ultra-low, low, mid, and high tar. The presence of misleading descriptors and any additional branding relating to tar or potentially indicating strength were also coded.

Results

Machine-assessed tar yields ranged from 0.1 to 8 mg. Cigarettes with a 1 mg machine-assessed tar yield accounted for 38% of all packs purchased. A majority (80%) of packs with tar values <3 mg had additional marketing present on the pack that highlighted tar yields, compared to 45% for packs with tar values 3 mg or greater. Many (85%) of the 1 mg packs and all of the 0.1 and 0.5 mg packs had additional marketing present that referenced tar levels.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that tobacco manufacturers are highlighting and reinforcing the tar yields of lower tar cigarettes by the deliberate use of tar level branding. These actions have the potential to mislead South Korean consumers that some cigarettes are less harmful than others. Strengthening of tobacco packaging regulations to prohibit references to tar yields on packs are needed to further protect consumers.

SUBMITTER: Iacobelli M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8231860 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionIn 2017, a quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine (QIV; Vaxigrip Tetra®, Sanofi) was licensed in South Korea for active immunization against influenza A and influenza B viruses in individuals aged 3 years or older, which was subsequently extended to individuals aged 6 months or older in 2018. Post-marketing surveillance trials are mandatory in South Korea to retain drug licensure. Here, we assessed the safety of QIV in routine clinical practice in South Korea.MethodsThis was an open, multicenter, observational, active safety surveillance study conducted between 20 June 2017 and 19 June 2021 at 10 study sites in South Korea in individuals aged 3 years or older who received a single dose of QIV during a routine healthcare visit. The participants or their legally acceptable representatives were instructed to record any adverse reactions (solicited events) and unsolicited non-serious adverse events (AE) in diary cards, and notify study investigators in case of serious adverse events (SAE).ResultsOverall, 663 participants were included in this study. There were no AEs leading to study termination, and no SAEs reported. Injection site pain (278 [41.9%]) was the most frequent solicited injection site reaction, with myalgia (250 [37.7%]) and malaise (236 [35.6%]) the most frequent solicited systemic reactions. Grade 3 solicited injection site and systemic reactions were reported by 8 (1.2%) and 13 (2.0%) participants, respectively; most participants with solicited reactions recovered without the need for further action. Overall, 39 (5.9%) participants experienced 49 unsolicited non-serious AEs with the most frequently reported being nasopharyngitis (19 [2.9%]). Grade 3 unsolicited non-serious adverse events were reported in 1 (0.2%) participant. None of the unsolicited non-serious AEs were considered to be related to QIV.ConclusionThis post-marketing surveillance study confirms that QIV is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile in routine practice in South Korea. No unexpected safety concerns were identified.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05406180.

Project description:Introduction:In the context of different regulatory environments, different patterns of e-cigarette use have emerged among adolescents worldwide. The United States and South Korea are two examples, the latter of which has maintained much more extensive regulation of e-cigarettes. Methods:This analysis compares the prevalence of e-cigarette and conventional cigarette use between 2011 and 2015 from the Korean Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey and the U.S. National Youth Tobacco Survey, both nationally representative samples of middle and high school students that use similar questions. Results:E-cigarette prevalence (past 30 days) among South Korean adolescents decreased from 4.7% in 2011 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.4-5.0) to 4.0% (3.7-4.3) in 2015 but increased dramatically among US adolescents from 0.9% (0.7-1.2) to 11.2% (9.9-12.7). Cigarette prevalence (past 30 days) decreased in South Korea from 12.1% (11.6-12.7) to 7.8% (CI: 7.3-8.3) and in the United States from 11.1% (9.5-12.6) to 6.1% (5.1-7.3). Combined prevalence of cigarette and e-cigarette use (adjusting for dual users) decreased in South Korea from 13.2% (12.7-13.8) to 8.5% (8.0-9.1) but increased in the United States from 11.3% (9.7-12.9) to 14.0% (12.4-15.7). Conclusions:In South Korea, where e-cigarettes are extensively regulated, adolescent e-cigarette use remained stable at a low level, whereas in the United States, where e-cigarette regulation has been limited, e-cigarette use increased. Combined e-cigarette plus cigarette use declined in South Korea whereas it increased in the United States. The restrictive policies in South Korea likely contributed to lower overall product use. Implications:This paper compared the strength of regulation of South Korea and the United States with the prevalence of adolescents' e-cigarette and cigarette use and suggests that more restrictive policies likely to contribute to lower e-cigarette use and overall use of e-cigarette and cigarette.

Project description:Introduction. Retail settings are major channels for the tobacco industry to market commercial tobacco products. However, few studies have examined marketing strategies on Tribal lands. The resulting evidence is important, especially given that American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth and adults have the highest smoking prevalence of any racial/ethnic group in the United States. In this study, we examined cigarette, e-cigarette, and vape/vaporizer availability, advertising, and price-reducing promotions in retail settings on and within a 1-mile radius of Tribal lands in California. Method. Trained AI/AN community health representatives (n = 8) conducted store observations (n = 96) using a checklist adapted from the Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings observation tool. Chi-square analyses were performed to look for potential differences in availability, exterior advertising, and price promotions for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and vapes between stores. Results. All stores sold cigarettes and over 95% sold menthol cigarettes. Nearly 25% of stores on Tribal lands were located inside a casino, and 40.4% of stores on Tribal lands offered a Tribal member discount. Stores within a 1-mile radius of Tribal lands sold significantly (p < .01) more e-cigarettes (69.8%), including flavored e-cigarettes (53.4%), compared to stores on Tribal lands (37.7% and 28.3%, respectively). Price promotions for cigarettes were significantly (p < .01) more common in stores located within a 1-mile radius of Tribal lands (46.5%) than stores on Tribal lands (22.6%). Discussion. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use store observations to examine cigarette and e-cigarette availability, advertising, and price promotions in retail settings on and near California Tribal lands. We recommend future studies build on our initial efforts to take an AI/AN Tribal community-engaged approach in assessing and documenting tobacco marketing practices on and near Tribal lands. Tribal governments can consider tobacco policies to help reduce smoking disparities and advance health equity for their communities.