Dataset Information

Improved Ipsilateral Breast and Chest Wall Sparing With MR-Guided 3-fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A Dosimetric Study Comparing MR-Linac and CT-Linac Plans.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is subject to treatment uncertainties that must be accounted for through planning target volume (PTV) margin. We hypothesize that magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy with reduced PTV margins enabled by real-time cine magnetic resonance image (MRI) target monitoring results in better normal tissue sparing compared with computed tomography (CT)-guided radiation therapy with commonly used clinical PTV margins. In this study, we compare the plan quality of ViewRay MRIdian Linac forward planned intensity modulated radiation therapy and TrueBeam volumetric modulated arc therapy for a novel 3-fraction APBI schedule.

Methods and materials

Targets and organs at risk (OARs) were segmented for 10 patients with breast cancer according to NSABP B39/RTOG 0413 protocol. A 3 mm margin was used to generate MR PTV_3mm and CT PTV_3mm plans, and a 10 mm margin was used for CT PTV_10mm. An APBI schedule delivering 24.6 Gy to the clinical target volume and 23.4 Gy to the PTV in 3 fractions was used. OAR dose constraints were scaled down from existing 5-fraction APBI protocols. Target and OAR dose-volume metrics for the following data sets were analyzed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test: (1) MR PTV_3mm versus CT PTV_3mm plans and (2) MR PTV_3mm versus CT PTV_10mm.

Results

Average PTVs were 84.3 ± 51.9 cm³ and 82.6 ± 55 cm³ (P = .5) for MR PTV_3mm and CT PTV_3mm plans, respectively. PTV V23.4Gy, dose homogeneity index, conformity index (CI), and R50 were similar. There was no meaningful difference in OAR metrics, despite MR PTV_3mm being larger than the CT PTV_3mm in 70% of the patients. Average PTVs for MR PTV_3mm and CT PTV_10mm plans were 84.3 ± 51.9 cm³ and 131.7 ± 74.4 cm³, respectively (P = .002). PTV V23.4Gy was 99% ± 0.9% versus 97.6% ± 1.4% (P = .03) for MR PTV_3mm and CT PTV_10mm, respectively. Dose homogeneity index, CI, and R50 were similar. MR PTV_3mm plans had better ipsilateral breast (V12.3Gy, 34.8% ± 12.7% vs 44.4% ± 10.9%, P = .002) and chest wall sparing (V24Gy, 8.5 ± 5.5 cm³ vs 21.8 ± 14.9 cm³, P = .004).

Conclusions

MR- and CT-based planning systems produced comparable plans when a 3 mm PTV margin was used for both plans. As expected, MR PTV_3mm plans produced better ipsilateral breast and chest wall sparing compared with CT PTV_10mm. The clinical relevance of these differences in dosimetric parameters is not known.

SUBMITTER: Musunuru HB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8233460 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeAccelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after breast-conserving surgery offers a well-tolerated adjuvant radiation therapy option for patients with breast cancer. We sought to describe patient-reported acute toxicity as a function of salient dosimetric parameters during and after an APBI regimen of 40 Gy in 10 once-daily fractions.Methods and materialsFrom June 2019 to July 2020, patients undergoing APBI were assigned a weekly, response-adapted, patient reported outcomes-common terminology criteria for adverse events-based acute toxicity assessment. Patients reported acute toxicity during treatment and for up to 8 weeks after treatment. Dosimetric treatment parameters were collected. Descriptive statistics and univariable analyses were used to summarize patient-reported outcomes and their correlation to corresponding dosimetric measures, respectively.ResultsOverall, 55 patients who received APBI completed a total of 351 assessments. Median planning target volume was 210 cc (range, 64-580 cc), and median planning target volume:ipsilateral breast volume ratio was 0.17 (range, 0.05-0.44). Overall, 22% of patients reported moderate breast enlargement and 27% reported maximum skin toxicity as severe or very severe. Furthermore, 35% of patients reported fatigue, and 44% of patients reported pain in the radiated area as moderate to very severe. Median time to first report of any moderate to very severe symptom was 10 days (interquartile range, 6-27 days). By 8 weeks after APBI, most patients reported resolution of symptoms, with 16% reporting residual moderate symptoms. Upon univariable analysis, none of the ascertained salient dosimetric parameters were associated with maximum symptoms or with the presence of moderate to very severe toxicity.ConclusionsWeekly assessments during and after APBI showed that patients experienced moderate to very severe toxicities, most commonly skin toxicity, but that these typically resolved by 8 weeks after radiation therapy. More comprehensive evaluations among larger cohorts are warranted to define the precise dosimetric parameters that correspond to outcomes of interest.

Project description:BackgroundT2 * mapping can characterize tumor hypoxia, which may be associated with resistance to therapy. Acquiring T2 * maps during MR-guided radiotherapy could inform treatment adaptation by, for example, escalating the dose to resistant sub-volumes.PurposeThe purpose of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of the accelerated T2 * mapping technique using model-based image reconstruction with integrated trajectory auto-correction (TrACR) for MR-guided radiotherapy on an MR-Linear accelerator (MR-Linac).Materials and methodsThe proposed method was validated in a numerical phantom, where two T2 * mapping approaches (sequential and joint) were compared for different noise levels (0,0.1,0.5,1) and gradient delays ([1, -1] and [1, -2] in units of dwell time for x- and y-axis, respectively). Fully sampled k-space was retrospectively undersampled using two different undersampling patterns. Root mean square errors (RMSEs) were calculated between reconstructed T2 * maps and ground truth. In vivo data was acquired twice weekly in one prostate and one head and neck cancer patient undergoing treatment on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Data were retrospectively undersampled and T2 * maps reconstructed, with and without trajectory corrections were compared.ResultsNumerical simulations demonstrated that, for all noise levels, T2 * maps reconstructed with a joint approach demonstrated less error compared to an uncorrected and sequential approach. For a noise level of 0.1, uniform undersampling and gradient delay [1, -1] (in units of dwell time for x- and y-axis, respectively), RMSEs for sequential and joint approaches were 13.01 and 9.32 ms, respectively, which reduced to 10.92 and 5.89 ms for a gradient delay of [1, 2]. Similarly, for alternate undersampling and gradient delay [1, -1], RMSEs for sequential and joint approaches were 9.80 and 8.90 ms, respectively, which reduced to 9.10 and 5.40 ms for gradient delay [1, 2]. For in vivo data, T2 * maps reconstructed with our proposed approach resulted in less artifacts and improved visual appearance compared to the uncorrected approach. For both prostate and head and neck cancer patients, T2 * maps reconstructed from different treatment fractions showed changes within the planning target volume (PTV).ConclusionUsing the proposed approach, a retrospective data-driven gradient delay correction can be performed, which is particularly relevant for hybrid devices, where full information on the machine configuration is not available for image reconstruction. T2 * maps were acquired in under 5 min and can be integrated into MR-guided radiotherapy treatment workflows, which minimizes patient burden and leaves time for additional imaging for online adaptive radiotherapy on an MR-Linac.