Dataset Information

Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Hepatic Hemangioma and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia using Computed Tomographic Spectral Imaging.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aims

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary hepatic malignancy. This study was designed to investigate the value of computed tomography (CT) spectral imaging in differentiating HCC from hepatic hemangioma (HH) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 51 patients who underwent spectral multiple-phase CT at 40-140 keV during the arterial phase (AP) and portal venous phase (PP). Slopes of the spectral curves, iodine density, water density derived from iodine- and water-based material decomposition images, iodine uptake ratio (IUR), normalized iodine concentration, and the ratio of iodine concentration in liver lesions between AP and PP were measured or calculated.

Results

As energy level decreased, the CT values of HCC (n=31), HH (n=17), and FNH (n=7) increased in both AP and PP. There were significant differences in IUR in the AP, IUR in the PP, normalized iodine concentration in the AP, slope in the AP, and slope in the PP among HCC, HH, and FNH. The CT values in AP, IUR in the AP and PP, normalized iodine concentration in the AP, slope in the AP and PP had high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating HH and HCC from FNH. Quantitative CT spectral data had higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional qualitative CT image analysis during the combined phases.

Conclusions

Mean CT values at low energy (40-90 keV) and quantitative analysis of CT spectral data (IUR in the AP) could be helpful in the differentiation of HCC, HH, and FNH.

SUBMITTER: Li W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8237149 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesNewly detected hepatic nodules during follow-up of cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy may pose a diagnostic dilemma. We investigated a series of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) diagnosed by either typical MRI features and follow-up or pathology in cancer survivors.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated 38 patients with tumours who developed new hepatic FNH after cyclophosphamide-based (n = 19) and oxaliplatin-based (n = 19) chemotherapies. The main tumour types were breast cancer (n = 18) and colorectal cancer (n = 17). MRI findings, clinical features, and temporal evolution of all target hepatic lesions (n = 63) were reported. In addition, the two chemotherapy drug groups were compared.ResultsThe median interval between chemotherapy completion and FNH detection was 30.4 months (12.9, 49.4). Six patients underwent biopsy or surgery, while the remaining patients were diagnosed based on typical MRI features and long-term follow-up. Among the patients, 60.5% (23/38) presented with multiple nodules and 63 target lesions were detected. The median size of target lesions was 11.5 mm (8.4, 15.1). The median follow-up time was 32.5 months (21.2, 48.6), and 15 patients experienced changes in their lesions during the follow-up period (11 increased and 4 decreased). The cyclophosphamide-based treatment group had a younger population, a greater proportion of females, and a shorter time to discovery than the oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy group (all p ≤ 0.016).ConclusionsFNH may occur in cancer survivors after cyclophosphamide- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Considering a patient's treatment history and typical MRI findings can help avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary invasive treatment.Clinical relevance statementWhen cancer survivors develop new hepatic nodules during follow-up, clinicians should think of the possibility of focal nodular hyperplasia in addition to liver metastasis, especially if the cancer survivors were previously treated with cyclophosphamide or oxaliplatin.Key pointsCancer survivors, after chemotherapy, can develop hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. Cyclophosphamide and oxaliplatin are two chemotherapeutic agents that predispose to focal nodular hyperplasia development. Focal nodular hyperplasia occurs at shorter intervals in patients treated with cyclophosphamide.

Project description:BackgroundPeripheral nodular cholangiocarcinoma (PCC) and hepatic hemangioma (HG) significantly differ in treatment strategies and prognosis. However, they can present similar imaging characteristics, making them difficult to distinguish. The distinction between PCC and atypical HG using pre-operative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) holds substantial significance.MethodsFifty-four cases of solitary hypovascular hepatic nodules (nodules ≤3 cm in diameter and enhancement not exceeding the hepatic parenchyma) confirmed pathologically were collected, including 25 cases of PCC and 29 cases of HG. The clinical and DCE-MRI features were observed, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were compared. The t-test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the differences between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on the diagnostic results of the two readings before and after the study by three diagnostic physicians.ResultsThe signal of PCC was more heterogeneous and could be shown as a ring hyperintensity signal on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). The T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) signal of HG lesions showed a more homogeneous high-intense signal. The ADC value of PCC patients was lower than that of HG patients. Most of the patients in the two groups presented marginal enhancement in the arterial phase with infrequent abnormal perfusion around. The intratumoral vascular traversal signs in the PCC group showed a diagnostic significance. Among the lesions with marginal enhancement at arterial stage, the enhancement in PCC group was more likely to have annular enhancement with the main manifestation of delay reduction and nebulous or separated/astral center. On the other hand, HG tended to be more likely to have nodular enhancement in the arterial phase with delayed invariance at the margins and with no significant enhancement at the center. The area under the curves (AUC) of the three radiologists before and after the two readings were 0.645 and 0.888, respectively.ConclusionsIn the differentiation of PCC and atypical liver hemangioma, the presence of a circular hyper-intense signal in DWI, the ADC values, and the pattern and extent of enhancement of marginal and central lesions were of diagnostic significance.

Project description:BackgroundThe typical enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) are hyper-enhanced in the arterial phase and washed out during the portal venous and late phases. However, atypical variations make a differential diagnosis both challenging and crucial. We aimed to investigate whether machine learning-based ultrasonic signatures derived from CEUS images could improve the diagnostic performance in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).Patients and methodsA total of 226 focal liver lesions, including 107 aHCC and 119 FNH lesions, examined by CEUS were reviewed retrospectively. For machine learning-based ultrasomics, 3,132 features were extracted from the images of the baseline, arterial, and portal phases. An ultrasomics signature was generated by a machine learning model. The predictive model was constructed using the support vector machine method trained with the following groups: ultrasomics features, radiologist's score, and combination of ultrasomics features and radiologist's score. The diagnostic performance was explored using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsA total of 14 ultrasomics features were chosen to build an ultrasomics model, and they presented good performance in differentiating FNH and aHCC with an AUC of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80, 0.89), a sensitivity of 76.6% (95% CI: 67.5%, 84.3%), and a specificity of 80.5% (95% CI: 70.6%, 85.9%). The model trained with a combination of ultrasomics features and the radiologist's score achieved a significantly higher AUC (0.93, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.96) than that trained with the radiologist's score (AUC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.89, P < 0.001). For the sub-group of HCC with normal AFP value, the model trained with a combination of ultrasomics features, and the radiologist's score remain achieved the highest AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.96) compared to that with the ultrasomics features (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.89, P < 0.001) and radiologist's score (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.91, P < 0.001).ConclusionsMachine learning-based ultrasomics performs as well as the staff radiologist in predicting the differential diagnosis of FNH and aHCC. Incorporating an ultrasomics signature into the radiologist's score improves the diagnostic performance in differentiating FNH and aHCC.