Hemorrhagic cholecystitis after coronary angiography.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Cunha R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8238398 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8562984 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hemorrhagic cholecystitis is a rare cause of abdominal pain that can have dire consequences. We report a case of hemorrhagic cholecystitis in a 51-year-old female presenting as shock and abdominal pain. The patient was transported to the emergency room. Ultrasound scan revealed hemoperitoneum and cholecystitis features. On computed tomography, mild gallbladder wall thickening and high density materials in the gallbladder suggested acute calculous cholecystitis, bleeding tumor, or hemorrhagic cholecystitis. An urgent cystic arterial embolization and percutaneous transhepatic drainage were done. After initial stablization, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed that revealed a necrotic gallbladder filled with large blood clots. It was important for timely management by having an early recognition of this potentially fatal condition.
| S-EPMC7553886 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive, less expensive, low-radiation alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). ICA is recommended for coronary evaluation before heart valvular surgery, and the supporting evidence for CCTA is insufficient. Our study is a single-center, prospective cohort study designed to evaluate the feasibility of CCTA instead of ICA in detection of coronary artery disease before surgery. Methods and Results Heart valvular surgery candidates were consecutively enrolled between April 2017 and December 2018. Nine hundred fifty-eight patients in the CCTA group underwent CCTA primarily, and those with ≥50% coronary stenosis or uncertain diagnosis underwent subsequent ICA. One thousand five hundred twenty-five patients in the ICA group underwent ICA directly before surgery. Coronary artery bypass grafting decision was made by surgeons according to CCTA or ICA results. Most of the patients (78.8%) in the CCTA group avoided invasive angiography. Thirty-day mortality (0.7% versus 0.9%, P=0.821), myocardial infarction (6.4% versus 6.9%, P=0.680 ), and low cardiac output syndrome (4.2% versus 2.8%, P=0.085) were similar in the CCTA and ICA groups. Median duration of follow-up was 19.3 months (interquartile range, 14.2-30.0 months), cumulative rates of mortality (2.6% versus 2.6%, P=0.882) and major adverse cardiac events (9.6% versus 9.0%, P=0.607) showed no difference between the 2 groups. Coronary evaluation expense was lower in the CCTA group ($149.6 versus $636.0, P<0.001). Conclusions The strategy of using CCTA as a doorkeeper in coronary evaluation before heart valvular surgery showed noninferiority in identification of candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting and postoperative safety.
| S-EPMC8475662 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study aims at identifying gene expression patterns in the whole blood that could differentiate patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis from subjects without detectable coronary artery disease (CAD), and assess associations of gene expression patterns with plaque features at coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Patients undergoing CCTA for suspected CAD, with no cardiovascular history, were enrolled. Coronary stenosis was quantified and CCTA plaque features were assessed. The whole-blood transcriptome was analyzed by RNA-Sequencing. We detected highly significant differences in the circulating transcriptome between patients with high-degree coronary stenosis (> 70%) at CCTA and subjects with the absence of coronary plaques. Noteworthy, regression analysis revealed expression signatures associated with Leaman score, segment involved score, segment-stenosis score, and plaque volume with density <150 HU at CCTA. This pilot study shows that patients with significant coronary stenosis are characterized by whole blood transcriptome profiles that may discriminate them from patients without CAD. Furthermore, our results suggest that whole blood transcriptional profiles may predict plaque characteristics.
2022-06-29 | GSE202625 | GEO
Project description:OBJECTIVE:To share our experience with the left distal radial approach for transradial coronary angiography and interventions. By performing the radial puncture in the fossa radialis or the so called anatomical "Snuffbox" we aimed to present the feasibility and complications of this new technique. METHODS:Left distal radial artery was used as an access site in 54 patients admitted to our clinic for coronary angiography and intervention between May 25th and October 20th 2017. All of them had pulse in their left distal radial artery. In the laboratory, they had their left arm gently flexed at the shoulder so that the hand was placed over their right groin. The operator stood on the right side of the patient and performed coronary angiography and interventions. During the hospital stay, demographic features and complications were recorded. RESULTS:Mean age of patients was 59.3 years and 80% were male. We used Judkins 6 French catheters for the procedures. Seventeen patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome. They all underwent successful left distal transradial coronary angiography and intervention. Primary angioplasty was performed in 10 patients. In total, 20 patients had coronary intervention. Left anterior descending artery was the artery requiring most intervention (11 patients). Two patients experienced brachial spasm requiring crossover to right femoral artery. There were no cases of radial artery occlusion, hematoma, or hand numbness. The radial sheath was removed at procedure termination. Hemostasis was achieved with manual compression. CONCLUSION:Left distal radial approach is safe and feasible as a new technique for coronary angiography and interventions.
| S-EPMC5998856 | biostudies-other
Project description:To evaluate how well patients with coronary stents accept combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA).While combined CTA and CTP may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with CTA alone, patient acceptance of CTA/CTP remains to be defined.A total of 90 patients with coronary stents prospectively underwent CTA/CTP (both with contrast agent, CTP with adenosine) and CCA as part of the CARS-320 study. In this group, an intraindividual comparison of patient acceptance of CTA, CTP, and CCA was performed.CTP was experienced to be significantly more painful than CTA (p<0.001) and was associated with a higher frequency of dyspnea (p<0.001). Comparison of CTA/CTP with CCA revealed no significant differences in terms of pain (p = 0.141) and comfort (p = 0.377). Concern before CTA/CTP and CCA and overall satisfaction were likewise not significantly different (p = 0.097 and p = 0.123, respectively). Nevertheless, about two thirds (n = 60, 68%) preferred CTA/CTP to CCA (p<0.001). Moreover, patients felt less helpless during CTA/CTP than during CCA (p = 0.026). Lack of invasiveness and absence of pain were the most frequently mentioned advantages of CTA/CTP over CCA in our patient population.CCA and combined CTA/CTP are equally well accepted by patients; however, more patients prefer CTA/CTP. CTP was associated with more intense pain than CTA and more frequently caused dyspnea than CTA alone.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00967876.
| S-EPMC4556695 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES:In the United States, the real-world feasibility and outcome of using fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) is unknown. We sought to determine whether a strategy that combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and FFRCT could safely reduce the need for invasive coronary angiography (ICA), as compared to coronary CTA alone. METHODS:The study included 387 consecutive patients with suspected CAD referred for coronary CTA with selective FFRCT and 44 control patients who underwent CTA alone. Lesions with 30-90% diameter stenoses were considered of indeterminate hemodynamic significance and underwent FFRCT. Nadir FFRCT ? 0.80 was positive. The rate of patients having ICA, revascularization and major adverse cardiac events were recorded. RESULTS:Using coronary CTA and selective FFRCT, 121 patients (32%) had at least one vessel with ?50% diameter stenosis; 67/121 (55%) patients had at least one vessel with FFRCT ? 0.80; 55/121 (45%) underwent ICA; and 34 were revascularized. The proportion of ICA patients undergoing revascularization was 62% (34 of 55). The number of patients with vessels with 30-50% diameter of stenosis was 90 (23%); 28/90 (31%) patients had at least one vessel with FFRCT ? 0.80; 8/90 (9%) underwent ICA; and five were revascularized. In our institutional practice, compared to coronary CTA alone, coronary CTA with selective FFRCT reduced the rates of ICA (45% vs. 80%) for those with obstructive CAD. Using coronary CTA with selective FFRCT, no major adverse cardiac events occurred over a mean follow-up of 440 days. CONCLUSION:FFRCT safely deferred ICA in patients with CAD of indeterminate hemodynamic significance. A high proportion of those who underwent ICA were revascularized.
| S-EPMC7074264 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The anatomical criteria for the diagnosis of ischaemia referenced by fractional flow reserve (FFR) from non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have not been evaluated contemporarily in a large-scale study. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of CCTA compared with ICA and IVUS in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.CCTA, ICA, IVUS, and FFR were performed in 181 coronary lesions with intermediate severity. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and per cent diameter stenosis (%DS) were determined by CCTA and ICA, whereas minimal lumen area (MLA) was determined by CCTA and IVUS. Inducible ischaemia was defined by FFR ? 0.80. Diagnostic performances from non-invasive and invasive methods were compared. FFR ? 0.80 was observed in 49 (27.1%) lesions. CCTA MLD was smaller than ICA MLD (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4 mm, P < 0.001), CCTA %DS was higher than ICA %DS (54.0 ± 14.0 vs. 50.3 ± 12.8%, P < 0.001), and CCTA MLA was smaller than IVUS MLA (2.2 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2 mm(2), P < 0.001). This trend was consistent irrespective of lesion location, lesion severity, and plaque characteristics. For the determination of ischaemia, diagnostic performance of CCTA %DS was lower than ICA %DS [area under the curve (AUC) 0.657 vs. 0.765, P = 0.04], and that of CCTA MLA was lower than IVUS MLA (AUC 0.712 vs. 0.801, P = 0.03).Anatomical criteria for the diagnosis of ischaemia-producing coronary stenosis differ by non-invasive and invasive methods. Compared with invasive methods, CCTA presents overestimation in assessing lesion severity and lower diagnostic performance in assessing ischaemia.
| S-EPMC4110885 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo determine the impact of low tube voltage coronary CT angiography on detection of subclinical atherosclerosis.Materials and methodsRetrospective sampling of an emergency department coronary CT angiography registry was performed. All patients in the registry underwent a noncontrast coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring scan at 120 kV before coronary CT angiography. The study sample (n = 264) constituted patients with subclinical atherosclerosis (Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System™ [CAD-RADS] 1 or 2) randomly mixed one-to-one with patients without atherosclerosis (CAD-RADS 0). The patients with coronary CT angiography performed at 70-90 kV were considered the low tube voltage group (n = 159) and patients with coronary CT angiography performed at 100-120 kV were considered the standard tube voltage group (n = 105). The number of coronary plaques and overall CAD-RADS classification (per patient) were evaluated twice: initially, by reading coronary CT angiography alone, and then, by coronary CT angiography in combination with a CAC scan. Considering the combined reading (CT angiography plus CAC scan) as the reference standard, the performance of coronary CT angiography alone was assessed for plaque detection and appropriate CAD-RADS (per patient) classification. The comparisons were made between the low tube voltage and standard tube voltage groups by using a Fisher exact test and χ2 test for proportions and a Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test for means.ResultsIn total, 455 plaques were identified in 118 patients (70 of 159 patients in the low tube voltage group; 48 of 105 in the standard tube voltage group). When reading coronary CT angiographic images alone, 97 of 455 (21%) plaques were missed that led to an incorrect CAD-RADS classification in 16 of 264 (6%) studies (interpreted as CAD-RADS 0 instead of CAD-RADS 1 or 2). Missed plaques were significantly more frequent in the low tube voltage group versus the standard tube voltage group (41% [85 of 206] vs 5% [12 of 249], respectively; P < .001). Incorrect CAD-RADS classification was also seen more commonly in the low tube voltage group (8.8% [14 of 159] vs 2% [two of 105]; P = .01), typically at low plaque burden (median CAC score, 1; range, 1-4). Calcified plaques that appeared isodense to luminal contrast material attenuation were seen more frequently in the low tube voltage group compared with the standard tube voltage group (20% [32 of 159] vs 7.6% [eight of 105], respectively; P = .005).ConclusionCoronary artery plaques may be missed at low tube voltage coronary CT angiographic examination performed without a concomitant CAC scan.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.See also the commentary by Truong in this issue.
| S-EPMC7977955 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimThe optimal diagnostic test in the work-up of suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may differ between men and women. The aim of this study was to compare sex-associated differences between using a diagnostic strategy including early coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and standard of care (SOC).MethodsIn total, 500 patients who presented with symptoms suggestive of ACS at the emergency department were randomised between a diagnostic strategy supplemented with early CCTA and SOC.ResultsWomen were generally older than men (mean ± standard deviation 56 ± 10 vs 53 ± 10 years, p < 0.01) and were less often admitted to hospital (33% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Obstructive coronary artery disease on CCTA (> 50% luminal narrowing) was less frequently seen in women (14% vs 26%, p = 0.02), and ACS was diagnosed less often in women (5% vs 10%, p = 0.03). Women underwent less outpatient testing when early CCTA was used in the emergency department evaluation of suspected ACS (p = 0.008).ConclusionWomen had a lower incidence of obstructive CAD on CCTA and were less often admitted to hospital than men. They were subjected to less outpatient testing when early CCTA was used in the emergency department evaluation of suspected ACS.
| S-EPMC8455783 | biostudies-literature