Dataset Information

Outcomes of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention in Tanzania's Lake Zone: a prospective, longitudinal study.

ABSTRACT: Evidence-based strategies for improving surgical quality and patient outcomes in low-resource settings are a priority. To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention (Safe Surgery 2020) on (1) adherence to safety practices, teamwork and communication, and documentation in patient files, and (2) incidence of maternal sepsis, postoperative sepsis, and surgical site infection. We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study in 10 intervention and 10 control facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone, across a 3-month pre-intervention period in 2018 and 3-month post-intervention period in 2019. SS2020 is a multicomponent intervention to support four surgical quality areas: (i) leadership and teamwork, (ii) evidence-based surgery, anesthesia and equipment sterilization practices, (iii) data completeness and (iv) infrastructure. Surgical team members received training and mentorship, and each facility received up to a $10 000 infrastructure grant. Inpatients undergoing major surgery and postpartum women were followed during their stay up to 30 days. We assessed adherence to 14 safety and teamwork and communication measures through direct observation in the operating room. We identified maternal sepsis (vaginal or cesarean delivery), postoperative sepsis and SSIs prospectively through daily surveillance and assessed medical record completeness retrospectively through chart review. We compared changes in surgical quality outcomes between intervention and control facilities using difference-in-differences analyses to determine areas of impact. Safety practices improved significantly by an additional 20.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.2-33.7%; P = 0.003) and teamwork and communication conversations by 33.3% (95% CI, 5.7-60.8%; P = 0.02) in intervention facilities compared to control facilities. Maternal sepsis rates reduced significantly by 1% (95% CI, 0.1-1.9%; P = 0.02). Documentation completeness improved by 41.8% (95% CI, 27.4-56.1%; P < 0.001) for sepsis and 22.3% (95% CI, 4.7-39.8%; P = 0.01) for SSIs. Our findings demonstrate the benefit of the SS2020 approach. Improvement was observed in adherence to safety practices, teamwork and communication, and data quality, and there was a reduction in maternal sepsis rates. Our results support the emerging evidence that improving surgical quality in a low-resource setting requires a focus on the surgical system and culture. Investigation in diverse contexts is necessary to confirm and generalize our results and to understand how to adapt the intervention for different settings. Further work is also necessary to assess the long-term effect and sustainability of such interventions.

SUBMITTER: Alidina S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8240014 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Outcomes of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention in Tanzania's Lake Zone: a prospective, longitudinal study.

Alidina Shehnaz S Menon Gopal G Staffa Steven J SJ Alreja Sakshie S Barash David D Barringer Erin E Cainer Monica M Citron Isabelle I DiMeo Amanda A Ernest Edwin E Fitzgerald Laura L Ghandour Hiba H Gruendl Magdalena M Hellar Audustino A Jumbam Desmond T DT Katoto Adam A Kelly Lauren L Kisakye Steve S Kuchukhidze Salome S Lama Tenzing T Lodge Ii William W Maina Erastus E Massaga Fabian F Mazhiqi Adelina A Meara John G JG Mshana Stella S Nason Ian I Reynolds Chase C Reynolds Cheri C Segirinya Hannington H Simba Dorcas D Smith Victoria V Strader Christopher C Sydlowski Meaghan M Tibyehabwa Leopold L Tinuga Florian F Troxel Alena A Ulisubisya Mpoki M Varallo John J Wurdeman Taylor T Zanial Noor N Zurakowski David D Kapologwe Ntuli N Maongezi Sarah S

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care 20210601 2

<h4>Background</h4>Evidence-based strategies for improving surgical quality and patient outcomes in low-resource settings are a priority.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention (Safe Surgery 2020) on (1) adherence to safety practices, teamwork and communication, and documentation in patient files, and (2) incidence of maternal sepsis, postoperative sepsis, and surgical site infection.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study in ...[more]

PMID: 34057187

Similar Datasets

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Effective, scalable strategies for improving surgical quality are urgently needed in low-income and middle-income countries; however, there is a dearth of evidence about what strategies are most effective. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Safe Surgery 2020, a multicomponent intervention focused on strengthening five areas: leadership and teamwork, safe surgical and anaesthesia practices, sterilisation, data quality and infrastructure to improve surgical quality in Tanzania. We hypothesise that Safe Surgery 2020 will (1) increase adherence to surgical quality processes around safety, teamwork and communication and data quality in the short term and (2) reduce complications from surgical site infections, postoperative sepsis and maternal sepsis in the medium term. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:Our design is a prospective, longitudinal, quasi-experimental study with 10 intervention and 10 control facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone. Participants will be surgical providers, surgical patients and postnatal inpatients at study facilities. Trained Tanzanian medical data collectors will collect data over a 3-month preintervention and postintervention period. Adherence to safety as well as teamwork and communication processes will be measured through direct observation in the operating room. Surgical site infections, postoperative sepsis and maternal sepsis will be identified prospectively through daily surveillance and completeness of their patient files, retrospectively, through the chart review. We will use difference-in-differences to analyse the impact of the Safe Surgery 2020 intervention on surgical quality processes and complications. We will use interviews with leadership and surgical team members in intervention facilities to illuminate the factors that facilitate higher performance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The study has received ethical approval from Harvard Medical School and Tanzania's National Institute for Medical Research. We will report results in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. If effective, the Safe Surgery 2020 intervention could be a promising approach to improve surgical quality in Tanzania's Lake Zone region and other similar contexts.

Project description:BackgroundSafe, high-quality surgical care in many African countries is a critical need. Challenges include availability of surgical providers, improving quality of care, and building workforce capacity. Despite growing evidence that mentoring is effective in African healthcare settings, less is known about its role in surgery. We examined a multimodal approach to mentorship as part of a safe surgery intervention (Safe Surgery 2020) to improve surgical quality. Our goal was to distill lessons for policy makers, intervention designers, and practitioners on key elements of a successful surgical mentorship program.MethodsWe used a convergent, mixed-methods design to examine the experiences of mentees, mentors, and facility leaders with mentorship at 10 health facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone. A multidisciplinary team of mentors worked with surgical providers over 17 months using in-person mentorship, telementoring, and WhatsApp. We conducted surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus groups to capture data in four categories: (1) satisfaction with mentorship; (2) perceived impact; (3) elements of a successful mentoring program; and (4) challenges to implementing mentorship. We analyzed quantitative data using frequency analysis and qualitative data using the constant comparison method. Recurrent and unifying concepts were identified through merging the qualitative and quantitative data.ResultsOverall, 96% of mentees experienced the intervention as positive, 88% were satisfied, and 100% supported continuing the intervention in the future. Mentees, mentors, and facility leaders perceived improvements in surgical practice, the surgical ecosystem, and in reducing postsurgical infections. Several themes related to the intervention's success emerged: (1) the intervention's design, including its multimodality, side-by-side mentorship, and standardization of practices; (2) the mentee-mentor relationship, including a friendly, safe, non-hierarchical, team relationship, as well as mentors' understanding of the local context; and (3) mentorship characteristics, including non-judgmental feedback, experience, and accessibility. Challenges included resistance to change, shortage of providers, mentorship dose, and logistics.ConclusionsOur study suggests a multimodal mentorship approach is promising in building the capacity of surgical providers. By distilling the experiences of the mentees, mentors, and facility leaders, our lessons provide a foundation for future efforts to establish effective surgical mentorship programs that build provider capacity and ultimately improve surgical quality.

Project description:Background/objectivesTo evaluate the long-term association between a multicomponent intervention program and disability in socioeconomically vulnerable older adults.DesignThis was a nonrandomized prospective intervention trial.SettingThe setting was a community.ParticipantsParticipants included older Koreans living alone or receiving government assistance from a low-income program.InterventionThe intervention was a 24-week multicomponent program compromising group exercise, nutritional supplementation, management of depression, deprescribing, and home hazard reduction (n = 187) versus usual care (n = 196).MeasurementsThe number of dependencies in 17 basic and instrumental activities of daily living was measured every 3 months for 30 months (range: 0-17; greater values indicated worse disability). Inverse probability weighting Poisson regression was used to model the number of dependencies to adjust for confounding bias and higher dropout rates of those with greater disability.ResultsThe study population had a mean age of 76 years, and 26% were men. During the 30-month follow up, 17 died (n = 8, intervention; n = 9, control), 62 (n = 16, intervention; n = 46, control) were institutionalized or received nursing home care, and 34 (n = 15, intervention; n = 19, control) were lost to follow up. After inverse probability weighting, the mean number of dependencies at baseline was 1.21 and 1.29 for the intervention group and the control group, respectively (P = .80). The intervention group had fewer dependencies than the control group, but the difference was attenuated over time: 1.08 versus 1.60 at 6 months (P = .04), 1.29 versus 1.87 at 12 months (P = .03), 1.62 versus 2.17 at 18 months (P = .06), 2.08 versus 2.51 at 24 months (P = .18), and 2.73 versus 2.90 at 30 months (P = .67).ConclusionA 24-week multicomponent intervention was associated with a slower progression of disability; however, the diminishing association from 24 months and beyond suggests that reassessment and intervention may be necessary. Due to a lack of randomization, our findings should be interpreted with caution.

Project description:BackgroundLongitudinal studies on functional outcome after colon resection are limited.ObjectiveExamine bowel dysfunction and related distress one and three years after colon resection utilizing the low anterior resection syndrome score as well as specific validated items.DesignThis study presents the long-term results of bowel dysfunction and related distress based on the quality of life in colon cancer study, an observational, prospective multicenter study of patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer.SettingsThe study was conducted at 21 Swedish and Danish surgical centers between 2015 and 2019.PatientsAll patients who underwent right- or left-sided colon resection were considered eligible. Exclusion criteria were age below 18, cognitive impairment or inability to understand Swedish/Danish. Patients completed extensive questionnaires at diagnosis, and after one and three years. Clinical data were supplemented by national quality registries.Main outcome measuresThe low anterior resection syndrome score, specific bowel symptoms and the patient-reported distress were assessed.ResultsOf 1,221 patients (83% response rate), 17% reported major LARS one year after either type of resection, consistent at 3 years (17% right, 16% left). In the long-term, the only significant difference between types of resection was a high occurrence of loose stools following right-sided resections. Overall, less than one-fifth of patients experienced distress, with women reporting more frequent symptoms and greater distress. In particular, incontinence and loose stools correlated strongly with distress.LimitationsAbsence of pre-diagnosis bowel function data.ConclusionsOur study indicates that bowel function remains largely intact following colon resection, with only a minority reporting significant distress. Adverse outcomes were more common among women. The occurrence of loose stools following right-sided resection and the association between incontinence, loose stools, and distress highlights a need for postoperative evaluations and more thorough assessments beyond the LARS score when evaluating colon cancer patients. See Video Abstract.

Dataset Information

Outcomes of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention in Tanzania's Lake Zone: a prospective, longitudinal study.

Publications

Outcomes of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention in Tanzania's Lake Zone: a prospective, longitudinal study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets