Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial.


ABSTRACT: This randomized phase II trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CRT alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) unsuitable for surgery (N = 110). The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), whereas the secondary outcome was overall survival. This trial did not meet pre-specified endpoints. The ORR was 74.5% in the induction chemotherapy group versus 61.8% in the CRT alone group (P = 0.152). The 3-year overall survival rate was 41.8% in the induction chemotherapy group and 38.1% in the CRT alone group (P = 0.584; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.54-1.41). Grade 3-5 adverse events were similar. Patients who responded to induction chemotherapy had improved survival in the post-hoc analysis. These results demonstrate no improvement in response rate or survival with the addition of induction chemotherapy to CRT in unselected patients with ESCC. Trial number: NCT02403531.

SUBMITTER: Liu S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8242031 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial.

Liu Shiliang S   Luo Liling L   Zhao Lei L   Zhu Yujia Y   Liu Hui H   Li Qiaoqiao Q   Cai Ling L   Hu Yonghong Y   Qiu Bo B   Zhang Li L   Shen Jingxian J   Yang Yadi Y   Liu Mengzhong M   Xi Mian M  

Nature communications 20210629 1


This randomized phase II trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CRT alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) unsuitable for surgery (N = 110). The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), whereas the secondary outcome was overall survival. This trial did not meet pre-specified endpoints. The ORR was 74.5% in the induction chemotherapy group versus 61.8% in the CRT alone group (P  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5960990 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8028221 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9005791 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6531702 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6138767 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9728519 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3937600 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8666950 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8179511 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6491187 | biostudies-literature