Dataset Information

Neurological outcomes associated with prehospital advanced airway management in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to foreign body airway obstruction.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Several studies have examined the association between advanced airway management (AAM) and survival for arrest that is non-shockable, noncardiac in origin, or due to suffocation; however, the efficacy of prehospital AAM compared with no AAM following foreign body removal by emergency medical services (EMS) has not been examined. We aimed to compare neurological outcomes in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to foreign body airway obstruction (FBAO) managed with and without AAM after foreign body removal.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study used all emergency transportation data of Japan and the All-Japan Utstein Registry. We included patients with OHCA aged ≥18 years undergoing resuscitation and removal of airway foreign bodies by EMS from January 2015 to December 2017. The exposure of interest was prehospital AAM by EMS after foreign body removal, and the primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge (i.e., a cerebral performance category of 1-2).

Results

Overall, 329,098 adults had OHCAs and 23,060 had foreign bodies removed from their airways; 3681 adult patients met our eligibility criteria and were divided as: AAM (2045) and non-AAM (1636) groups. Propensity score matching resulted in 1210 matched pairs with balanced baseline characteristics between the groups. The rate of favorable neurological outcome was significantly lower in the AAM group than in the non-AAM group (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.62). However, survival was not significantly different between the two groups (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.84-1.37).

Conclusions

We have not demonstrated the benefit of AAM for patients with OHCA due to FBAO. Further study will be required to confirm the efficacy of AAM for those patients.

SUBMITTER: Otomune K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8244501 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background The timing of advanced airway management (AAM) on patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has not been fully investigated. We evaluated the association between the timing of prehospital AAM and 1-month survival. Methods and Results We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective, nationwide, population-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry in Japan. We included emergency medical services-treated adult (≥18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from 2014 through 2017, stratified into initial shockable or nonshockable rhythms. Patients who received AAM at any minute after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation underwent risk-set matching with patients who were at risk of receiving AAM within the same minute using time-dependent propensity scores. Eleven thousand three hundred six patients with AAM in shockable and 163 796 with AAM in nonshockable cohorts, respectively, underwent risk-set matching. For shockable rhythms, the risk ratios (95% CIs) of AAM on 1-month survival were 1.01 (0.89-1.15) between 0 and 5 minutes, 1.06 (0.98-1.15) between 5 and 10 minutes, 0.99 (0.87-1.12) between 10 and 15 minutes, 0.74 (0.59-0.92) between 15 and 20 minutes, 0.61 (0.37-1.00) between 20 and 25 minutes, and 0.73 (0.26-2.07) between 25 and 30 minutes after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. For nonshockable rhythms, the risk ratios of AAM were 1.12 (1.00-1.27) between 0 and 5 minutes, 1.34 (1.25-1.44) between 5 and 10 minutes, 1.39 (1.26-1.54) between 10 and 15 minutes, 1.20 (0.99-1.45) between 15 and 20 minutes, 1.18 (0.80-1.73) between 20 and 25 minutes, 0.63 (0.29-1.38) between 25 and 30 minutes, and 0.44 (0.11-1.69) after 30 minutes. Conclusions In this observational study, the timing of AAM was not statistically associated with improved 1-month survival for shockable rhythms, but AAM within 15 minutes after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with improved 1-month survival for nonshockable rhythms.