Dataset Information

Comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with pulseless-ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

ABSTRACT:

Aim

While previous studies have shown that the initial documented rhythm is associated with clinical outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), little is known about the difference in clinical outcomes between pulseless ventricular tachycardia (p-VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF).

Methods

From a nationwide, prospective population-based database of OHCA from 2011 to 2015, we selected bystander-witnessed adult patients who were not treated with a public automated external defibrillator. The outcomes examined were favorable 30-day neurological survival rates, 30-day survival rates, and prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates. To determine the association of the initial documented rhythm with outcome, we used a logistic regression model while adjusting for patient factors and prehospital care-related factors.

Results

A total of 19,594 bystander-witnessed OHCA patients who had a shockable rhythm were included: 454 (2.3%) were p-VT and 19,140 (97.7%) were VF. Compared to VF patients, p-VT patients were older, less likely to have a cardiogenic cause, and had shorter resuscitation-related time intervals (collapse to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, collapse to emergency medical services contact, collapse to first ROSC, and first defibrillation to first ROSC). After adjustment for covariates, p-VT was associated with high favorable 30-day neurological survival rates (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.64, p = 0.001), 30-day survival rates (adjusted OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.03-1.95, p = 0.037), and prehospital ROSC rates (adjusted OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.42-2.55, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In this study, patients with p-VT as the initial documented rhythm had significantly better outcomes than those with VF.

SUBMITTER: Kato Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8244523 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSeveral prospective studies have demonstrated that the echocardiographic detection of any myocardial activity during PEA is strongly associated with higher rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We hypothesized that PEA represents a spectrum of disease in which not only the presence of myocardial activity, but more specifically that the degree of left ventricular (LV) function would be a predictor of outcomes. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the association between LV function and outcomes in patients with OHCA.Materials and methodsUsing prospectively obtained data from an observational cohort of patients receiving focused echocardiography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the Emergency Department (ED) setting, we analyzed 312 consecutive subjects with available echocardiography images with initial rhythm of PEA. We used left ventricular systolic fractional shortening (LVFS), a unidimensional echocardiographic parameter to perform the quantification of LV function during PEA. Regression analyses were performed independently to evaluate for relationships between LVFS and a primary outcome of ROSC and secondary outcome of survival to hospital admission. We analyzed LVFS both as a continuous variable and as a categorial variable using the quartiles and the median to perform multiple different comparisons and to illustrate the relationship of LVFS and outcomes of interest. We performed survival analysis using Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the hazard corresponding to length of resuscitation.ResultsWe found a positive association between LVFS and the primary outcome of ROSC (OR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01-1.08), but not with the secondary outcome of survival to hospital admission (OR 1.02, 95%CI 0.96-1.08). Given that the relationship was not linear and that we observed a threshold effect in the relationship between LVFS and outcomes, we performed an analysis using quartiles of LVFS. The predicted probability of ROSC was 75% for LVFS between 23.4-96% (fourth quartile) compared to 47% for LVFS between 0-4.7% (first quartile). The hazard of not achieving ROSC was significantly greater for subjects with LVFS below the median (13.1%) compared to the subgroup with LVFS greater than 13.1% (p < 0.05), with the separation of the survival curves occurring at approximately 40 min of resuscitation duration.ConclusionsLeft ventricular function measured by LVFS is positively correlated with higher probability of ROSC and may be associated with higher chances of survival in patients with PEA arrest.

Project description:Post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may occur from myocardial dysfunction underlying cardiogenic shock and/or inflammation-mediated distributive shock. Distinguishing the predominant shock subtype with widely available clinical metrics may have prognostic and therapeutic value.A two-hospital cohort was assembled of patients in shock following OHCA. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed via echocardiography or cardiac ventriculography within 1 day post arrest and used to delineate shock physiology. The study evaluated whether higher LVEF, indicating distributive-predominant shock physiology, was associated with neurocognitive outcome (primary endpoint), survival, and duration of multiple organ failures. The study also investigated whether volume resuscitation exhibited a subtype-specific association with outcome.Of 162 patients with post-resuscitation shock, 48% had normal LVEF (>?40%), consistent with distributive shock physiology. Higher LVEF was associated with less favorable neurocognitive outcome (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.94 per 10% increase in LVEF; p?=?0.01). Higher LVEF also was associated with worse survival (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97; p?=?0.02) and fewer organ failure-free days (? = - 0.67, 95% CI - 1.28 to -?0.06; p?=?0.03). Only 51% of patients received a volume challenge of at least 30 ml/kg body weight in the first 6 h post arrest, and the volume received did not differ by LVEF. Greater volume resuscitation in the first 6 h post arrest was associated with favorable neurocognitive outcome (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.99-2.55 per liter; p?=?0.03) and survival (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.04; p?=?0.02) among patients with normal LVEF but not low LVEF.In post-resuscitation shock, higher LVEF-indicating distributive shock physiology-was associated with less favorable neurocognitive outcome, fewer days without organ failure, and higher mortality. Greater early volume resuscitation was associated with more favorable neurocognitive outcome and survival in patients with this shock subtype. Additional studies with repeated measures of complementary hemodynamic parameters are warranted to validate the clinical utility for subtyping post-resuscitation shock.