Dataset Information

Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives/hypothesis

Two types of electrode arrays for cochlear implants (CIs) are distinguished: lateral wall and perimodiolar. Scalar translocation of the array can lead to intracochlear trauma by penetrating from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli or scala media, potentially negatively affecting hearing performance of CI users. This systematic review compares the lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays with respect to scalar translocation.

Study design

Systematic review.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for studies published within the last 11 years. No other limitations were set. All studies with original data that evaluated the occurrence of scalar translocation or tip fold-over (TF) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) following primary cochlear implantation in bilateral sensorineuronal hearing loss patients were considered to be eligible. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers.

Results

We included 33 studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis of five cohort studies comparing scalar translocation between lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays showed that lateral wall arrays have significantly lower translocation rates (7% vs. 43%; pooled odds ratio = 0.12). Translocation was negatively associated with speech perception scores (weighted mean 41% vs. 55%). Tip fold-over of the array was more frequent with perimodiolar arrays (X² = 6.8, P < .01).

Conclusions

Scalar translocation and tip fold-overs occurred more frequently with perimodiolar arrays than with lateral wall arrays. In addition, translocation of the array negatively affects hearing with the cochlear implant. Therefore, if one aims to minimize clinically relevant intracochlear trauma, lateral wall arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 131:1358-1368, 2021.

SUBMITTER: Jwair S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8246990 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:HypothesisInsertion forces can be reduced by magnetically guiding the tip of lateral-wall cochlear-implant electrode arrays during insertion via both cochleostomy and the round window.BackgroundSteerable electrode arrays have the potential to minimize intracochlear trauma by reducing the severity of contact between the electrode-array tip and the cochlear wall. However, steerable electrode arrays typically have increased stiffness associated with the steering mechanism. In addition, steerable electrode arrays are typically designed to curve in the direction of the basal turn, which is not ideal for round-window insertions, as the cochlear hook's curvature is in the opposite direction. Lateral-wall electrode arrays can be modified to include magnets at their tips, augmenting their superior flexibility with a steering mechanism. By applying magnetic torque to the tip, an electrode array can be navigated through the cochlear hook and the basal turn.MethodsAutomated insertions of candidate electrode arrays are conducted into a scala-tympani phantom with either a cochleostomy or round-window opening. The phantom is mounted on a multi-degree-of-freedom force sensor. An external magnet applies the necessary magnetic bending torque to the magnetic tip of a modified clinical electrode array, coordinated with the insertion, with the goal of directing the tip down the lumen. Steering of the electrode array is verified through a camera.ResultsStatistical t-test results indicate that magnetic guidance does reduce insertion forces by as much as 50% with certain electrode-array models. Direct tip contact with the medial wall through the cochlear hook and the lateral wall of the basal turn is completely eliminated. The magnetic field required to accomplish these insertions varied from 77 to 225 mT based on the volume of the magnet at the tip of the electrode array. Alteration of the tip to accommodate a tiny magnet is minimal and does not change the insertion characteristic of the electrode array unless the tip shape is altered.ConclusionMagnetic guidance can eliminate direct tip contact with the medial walls through the cochlear hook and the lateral walls of the basal turn. Insertion-force reduction will vary based on the electrode-array model, but is statistically significant for all models tested. Successful steering of lateral-wall electrode arrays is accomplished while maintaining its superior flexibility.

Project description:PurposeCochlear implants (CIs) are neural prosthetic devices that provide a sense of sound to people who experience profound hearing loss. Recent research has indicated that there is a significant correlation between hearing outcomes and the intracochlear locations of the electrodes. We have developed an image-guided cochlear implant programming (IGCIP) system based on this correlation to assist audiologists with programming CI devices. One crucial step in our IGCIP system is the localization of CI electrodes in postimplantation CTs. Existing methods for this step are either not fully automated or not robust. When the CI electrodes are closely spaced, it is more difficult to identify individual electrodes because there is no intensity contrast between them in a clinical CT. The goal of this work is to automatically segment the closely spaced CI electrode arrays in postimplantation clinical CTs.MethodsThe proposed method involves firstly identifying a bounding box that contains the cochlea by using a reference CT. Then, the intensity image and the vesselness response of the VOI are used to segment the regions of interest (ROIs) that may contain the electrode arrays. For each ROI, we apply a voxel thinning method to generate the medial axis line. We exhaustively search through all the possible connections of medial axis lines. For each possible connection, we define CI array centerline candidates by selecting two points on the connected medial axis lines as the array endpoints. For each CI array centerline candidate, we use a cost function to evaluate its quality, and the one with the lowest cost is selected as the array centerline. Then, we fit an a priori known geometric model of the array to the centerline to localize the individual electrodes. The method was trained on 28 clinical CTs of CI recipients implanted with three models of closely spaced CI arrays. The localization results are compared with the ground truth localization results manually generated by an expert.ResultsA validation study was conducted on 129 clinical CTs of CI recipients implanted with three models of closely spaced arrays. Ninety-eight percent of the localization results generated by the proposed method had maximum localization errors lower than one voxel diagonal of the CTs. The mean localization error was 0.13 mm, which was close to the rater's consistency error (0.11 mm). The method also outperformed the existing automatic electrode localization methods in our validation study.ConclusionOur validation study shows that our method can localize closely spaced CI arrays with an accuracy close to what is achievable by an expert on clinical CTs. This represents a crucial step toward automating IGCIP and translating it from the laboratory to the clinical workflow.