Dual inhibition of CB1 receptors and iNOS, as a potential novel approach to the pharmacological management of acute and long COVID-19.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Cinar R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8251289 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background and purposeClozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug that is very efficacious in treating psychosis, but the risk of severe cardiotoxicity limits its clinical use. The present study investigated the harmful effects of clozapine on myocardium and assessed the involvement of cannabinoid receptors in its cardiotoxicity.Experimental approachClozapine alone or in combination with selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists or agonists were used to treat mice and cardiomyocytes.Key resultsClozapine induced myocardial inflammation and infiltration 7 days after i.p. injection. Mice survival rate and myocardial infiltration, and fibrotic lesions were dose-dependently worsened by clozapine. Clozapine decreased major endocannabinoid levels in sera and cultured cardiomyocytes. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors decreased in clozapine-treated hearts and were translocated from cytomembranes to cytoplasm and nuclei, whereas CB2 receptors increased in clozapine-treated hearts and inversely translocated from nuclei to the cytomembrane. Selective antagonists of CB1 receptors, rimonabant and AM281, but not its selective agonist arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide, ameliorated clozapine-induced myocardial inflammatory infiltration and fibrotic lesions. In contrast, selective agonists of CB2 receptors, AM1241 and JWH-133, but not its selective antagonist AM630, blunted clozapine-mediated cardiotoxicity in mice. In cultured cardiomyocytes, clozapine increased the pro-inflammatory factor IL-1β and the concentrations of myocardial injury markers (LDH and aspartate aminotransferase); these effects were reversed by either a CB1 antagonist or CB2 agonist and further prevented by combined pretreatments.Conclusions and implicationsOur data provide evidence that cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors have opposite effects and selective antagonists of CB1 or agonists of CB2 receptors might confer protective effects against clozapine in myocardium.
| S-EPMC6433645 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeReceptor internalisation is by nature kinetic. Application of a standard equilibrium dose response model to describe the properties of a ligand inducing internalisation, while commonly used, are therefore problematic. Here, we propose two quantitative approaches to address this issue-(a) a model-free method and (b) a kinetic modelling approach-and systematically evaluate the performance of these methods against traditional equilibrium methods to characterise the internalisation profiles of cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists.Experimental approachKinetic internalisation assays were conducted using a concentration series of six CB1 receptor ligands. Internalisation rate analysis and snapshot equilibrium analysis were performed. A model-free method was developed based on the mean residence time of internalisation. A kinetic internalisation model was developed under the quasi-steady state assumption.Key resultsRates of receptor internalisation depended on both agonist and concentration. Agonist potencies from snapshot equilibrium analysis increased with stimulation time, and there was no single time point at which internalisation profiles could infer agonist properties in a comparative manner. The model-free method yielded a time-invariant measure of potency/efficacy for internalisation. The kinetic model adequately described the internalisation of CB1 receptors over time and provided robust estimates of both potency and efficacy.Conclusion and implicationsApplying equilibrium analysis to a non-equilibrium pathway cannot provide a reliable estimate of agonist potency. Both the model-free and kinetic modelling approaches characterised the internalisation profiles of CB1 receptor agonists. The kinetic model provides additional advantages as a method to capture changes in receptor number during other functional assays.
| S-EPMC6592866 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeObesity, an important risk factor for developing chronic kidney disease (CKD), affects the kidneys by two main molecular signalling pathways: the endocannabinoid/CB1 receptor system, whose activation in obesity promotes renal inflammation, fibrosis, and injury, and the inducible NOS (iNOS), which generates ROS resulting in oxidative stress. Hence, a compound that inhibits both peripheral CB1 receptors and iNOS may serve as an effective therapeutic agent against obesity-induced CKD.Experimental approachHere, we describe the effect of a novel peripherally restricted, orally bioavailable dual CB1 receptor/iNOS antagonist, MRI-1867 (3 mg·kg-1 ), in ameliorating obesity-induced CKD, and compared its metabolic and renal efficacies to a stand-alone peripheral CB1 receptor antagonist (JD5037; 3 mg·kg-1 ), iNOS antagonist (1400W; 10 mg·kg-1 ), and pair feeding. Mice with high-fat diet-induced obesity were treated orally with these compounds or vehicle (Veh) for 28 days. Standard diet-fed mice treated with Veh served as controls.Key resultsEnhanced expression of CB1 receptors and iNOS in renal tubules was found in human kidney patients with obesity and other CKDs. The hybrid inhibitor ameliorated obesity-induced kidney morphological and functional changes via decreasing kidney inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and renal injury. Some of these features were independent of the improved metabolic profile mediated via inhibition of CB1 receptors. An additional interesting finding is that these beneficial effects on the kidney were partially associated with modulating renal adiponectin signalling.Conclusions and implicationsCollectively, our results highlight the therapeutic relevance of blocking CB1 receptors and iNOS in ameliorating obesity-induced CKD.
| S-EPMC6976880 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeMuch of the opioid epidemic arose from abuse of prescription opioid drugs. This study sought to determine if the combination of a cannabinoid with an opioid could produce additive or synergistic effects on pain, allowing reduction in the opioid dose needed for maximal analgesia.Experimental approachPain was assayed using the formalin test in mice and the carrageenan assay in rats. Morphine and two synthetic cannabinoids were tested: WIN55,212-2 (WIN), which binds to both CB1 and CB2 receptors, and possibly TRPV1 channels; and GP1a, which has activity at CB2 receptors and is reported to inhibit fatty acid amide hydrolase, thus raising levels of endogenous cannabinoids.Key resultsMorphine in combination with WIN in the formalin test gave synergistic analgesia. Studies with selective antagonists showed that WIN was acting through CB1 receptors. Morphine in combination with GP1a in the formalin test was sub-additive. In the carrageenan test, WIN had no added effect when combined with morphine, but GP1a with morphine showed enhanced analgesia. Both WIN and Gp1a used alone had analgesic activity in the formalin pain test, but not in the carrageenan pain test.Conclusions and implicationsThe ability of a cannabinoid to produce an additive or synergistic effect on analgesia when combined with morphine varies with the pain assay and may be mediated by CB1 or CB2 receptors. These results hold the promise of using cannabinoids to reduce the dose of opioids for analgesia in certain pain conditions.
| S-EPMC6692585 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS) is a rare genetic disorder which, in its most common and severe form, HPS-1, leads to fatal adult-onset pulmonary fibrosis (PF) with no effective treatment. We evaluated the role of the endocannabinoid/CB1 R system and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) for dual-target therapeutic strategy using human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lung samples from patients with HPS and controls, HPS-PF patient-derived lung fibroblasts, and bleomycin-induced PF in pale ear mice (HPS1ep/ep ). We found overexpression of CB1 R and iNOS in fibrotic lungs of HPSPF patients and bleomycin-infused pale ear mice. The endocannabinoid anandamide was elevated in BALF and negatively correlated with pulmonary function parameters in HPSPF patients and pale ear mice with bleomycin-induced PF. Simultaneous targeting of CB1 R and iNOS by MRI-1867 yielded greater antifibrotic efficacy than inhibiting either target alone by attenuating critical pathologic pathways. Moreover, MRI-1867 treatment abrogated bleomycin-induced increases in lung levels of the profibrotic interleukin-11 via iNOS inhibition and reversed mitochondrial dysfunction via CB1 R inhibition. Dual inhibition of CB1 R and iNOS is an effective antifibrotic strategy for HPSPF.
| S-EPMC8255071 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeProtective mechanisms of the endogenous cannabinoid system against drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are actively being investigated regarding the differential regulatory role of the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors in liver fibrogenesis and inflammation.Experimental approachThe 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG)-related signalling receptors and enzymatic machinery, and inflammatory/fibrogenic factors were investigated in the liver of a mouse model of hepatotoxicity induced by acute and repeated overdoses (750 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 ) of paracetamol (acetaminophen), previously treated with selective CB1 (ACEA) and CB2 (JWH015) agonists (10 mg·kg-1 ), or lacking CB1 and CB2 receptors.Key resultsAcute paracetamol increased the expression of CB2 , ABHD6 and COX-2, while repeated paracetamol increased that of CB1 and COX-2 and decreased that of DAGLβ. Both acute paracetamol and repeated paracetamol decreased the liver content of acylglycerols (2-AG, 2-LG and 2-OG). Human liver samples from a patient suffering APAP hepatotoxicity confirmed CB1 and CB2 increments. Acute paracetamol-exposed CB2 KO mice had higher expression of the fibrogenic αSMA and the cytokine IL-6 and lower apoptotic cleaved caspase 3. CB1 deficiency enhanced the repeated APAP-induced increases in αSMA and cleaved caspase 3 and blocked those of CYP2E1, TNF-α, the chemokine CCL2 and the circulating γ-glutamyltransferase (γGT). Although JWH015 reduced the expression of αSMA and TNF-α in acute paracetamol, ACEA increased the expression of cleaved caspase 3 and CCL2 in repeated paracetamol.Conclusion and implicationsThe differential role of CB1 versus CB2 receptors on inflammatory/fibrogenic factors related to paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity should be considered for designing alternative therapies against DILI.
| S-EPMC7312315 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The alkylindole (AI), WIN55212-2, modulates the activity of several proteins, including cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1R, CB2R), and at least additional G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that remains uncharacterized with respect to its molecular identity and pharmacological profile. Evidence suggests that such AI-sensitive GPCRs are expressed by the human kidney cell line HEK293. We synthesized fourteen novel AI analogues and evaluated their activities at AI-sensitive GPCRs using [35S]GTPγS and [3H]WIN55212-2 binding in HEK293 cell membranes, and performed in silico pharmacophore modeling to identify characteristics that favor binding to AI-sensitive GPCRs versus CB1R/CB2R. Compounds 10 and 12 stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding (EC50s = 3.5 and 1.1 nM, respectively), and this response was pertussis toxin-sensitive, indicating that AI-sensitive GPCRs couple to Gi/o proteins. Five AI analogues reliably distinguished two binding sites that correspond to the high and low affinity state of AI-sensitive GPCRs coupled or not to G proteins. In silico pharmacophore modeling suggest 3 characteristics that favor binding to AI-sensitive GPCRs versus CB1R/CB2R: 1) an s-cis orientation of the two aromatic rings in AI analogues, 2) a narrow dihedral angle between the carbonyl group and the indole ring plane [i.e., O-C(carbonyl)-C3-C2] and 3) the presence of a carbonyl oxygen. The substituted alkylindoles reported here represent novel chemical tools to study AI-sensitive GPCRs.
| S-EPMC10917149 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeIn preclinical studies, cannabidiol (CBD) mitigates fear memories by facilitating their extinction or interfering with their generalization and reconsolidation. The brain regions and mechanisms underlying these effects, and their temporal window, are still poorly understood. Here, we have investigated related questions in the dorsal hippocampus (DH) during contextual fear consolidation.Experimental approachAdult male Wistar rats received CBD (10-30 pmol) intra-DH immediately, 1 or 3 hr after fear conditioning. Effects of CBD on consolidation were inferred behaviourally and by analysing expression of the activity-regulated, cytoskeleton-associated (Arc) protein. The contribution of anandamide, CB1 , CB2 , 5-HT1A , A2A , and PPARγ receptors was also assessed.Key resultsCBD impaired memory consolidation when given immediately or 1 hr after fear conditioning, but not after 3 hr. Expression of Arc protein in DH was reduced by systemic CBD treatment in both cases. Immediately after fear conditioning, CBD effects were abolished by CB1 or CB2 receptor blockade, partly reduced by 5-HT1A or A2A antagonism, and remained unchanged after antagonism of PPARγ receptors. One hour after fear conditioning, CBD effects were prevented only by PPARγ receptor antagonism. Also, inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase by URB597, impaired memory consolidation when infused immediately, but not 1 hr after fear conditioning.Conclusions and implicationsCBD disrupts memory consolidation up to 1 hr after fear conditioning, allowing an extended window of opportunity to mitigate aversive memories after their acquisition. Our results suggest time-dependent participation of anandamide, CB1 , CB2 and PPARγ receptors in the DH, during this process.
| S-EPMC7024734 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeCannabis or cannabinoids produce characteristic tetrad effects-analgesia, hypothermia, catalepsy and suppressed locomotion, which are believed to be mediated by the activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Given recent findings of CB2 and GPR55 receptors in the brain, we examined whether these receptors are also involved in cannabinoid action.Experimental approachWe compared Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9 -THC)-, WIN55212-2-, or XLR11-induced tetrad effects between wild-type (WT) and each genotype of CB1 -, CB2 - or GPR55-knockout (KO) mice and then observed the effects of antagonists of these receptors on these tetrad effects in WT mice.Key resultsSystemic administration of Δ9 -THC, WIN55212-2 or XLR11 produced dose-dependent tetrad effects in WT mice. Genetic deletion or pharmacological blockade of CB1 receptors abolished the tetrad effects produced by all three cannabinoids. Unexpectedly, genetic deletion of CB2 receptor abolished analgesia and catalepsy produced by Δ9 -THC or WIN55212-2, but not by XLR11. Microinjections of Δ9 -THC into the lateral ventricles also produced tetrad effects in WT, but not in CB1 -KO mice. CB2 -KO mice displayed a reduction in intraventricular Δ9 -THC-induced analgesia and catalepsy. In contrast to CB1 and CB2 receptors, genetic deletion of GPR55 receptors caused enhanced responses to Δ9 -THC or WIN55212-2. Antagonisim of CB1 , CB2 or GPR55 receptors produced alterations similar to those observed in each genotype mouse line.Conclusions and implicationsThese findings suggest that in addition to CB1 , both CB2 and GPR55 receptors are also involved in some pharmacological effects produced by cannabinoids. CB1 /CB2 , in contrast to GPR55, receptors appears to play opposite roles in cannabinoid action.
| S-EPMC7070166 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors (CB1R, CB2R) are members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family that were identified over 20 years ago. CB1Rs and CB2Rs mediate the effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the principal psychoactive constituent of marijuana, and subsequently identified endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids) anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol. CB1Rs and CB2Rs have both similarities and differences in their pharmacology. Both receptors recognize multiple classes of agonist and antagonist compounds and produce an array of distinct downstream effects. Natural polymorphisms and alternative splice variants may also contribute to their pharmacological diversity. As our knowledge of the distinct differences grows, we may be able to target select receptor conformations and their corresponding pharmacological responses. This chapter will discuss their pharmacological characterization, distribution, phylogeny, and signaling pathways. In addition, the effects of extended agonist exposure and how that affects signaling and expression patterns of the receptors are considered.
| S-EPMC5812699 | biostudies-literature