Dataset Information

Quality of life in men and women with heart failure: association with outcome, and comparison between the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and the EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

We sought to analyse quality of life (QoL) measures derived from two questionnaires widely used in clinical trials, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the EuroQoL 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and to compare their prognostic value in men and women with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods and results

From the BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure (BIOSTAT-CHF) we compared KCCQ and EQ-5D at baseline and after 9 months in 1276 men and 373 women with new-onset or worsening symptoms of HFrEF, who were sub-optimally treated and in whom there was an anticipated up-titration of guideline-derived medical therapies. Women had significantly worse baseline QoL (median) as compared with men, both when assessed with KCCQ overall score (KCCQ-OS, 44 vs. 53, P < 0.001) and EQ-5D utility score (0.62 vs. 0.73, P < 0.001). QoL improved equally in women and men at follow-up. All summary measures of QoL were independently associated with all-cause mortality, with KCCQ-OS showing the most remarkable association with mortality up to 1 year compared to the EQ-5D scores (C-statistic 0.650 for KCCQ-OS vs. 0.633 and 0.599 for EQ-5D utility score and EQ-5D visual analogue scale, respectively). QoL was associated with all outcomes analysed, both in men and women (all P for interaction with sex >0.2).

Conclusion

Amongst patients with HFrEF, women reported significantly worse QoL than men. QoL was independently associated with subsequent outcome, similarly in men and women. The KCCQ in general, and the KCCQ-OS in particular, showed the strongest independent association with outcome.

SUBMITTER: Ravera A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8252457 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are relevant independent outcomes in heart failure (HF) care and are predictive of subsequent hospitalization and death in HF. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) are the 2 most widely adopted PROMs specific to HF. We compared their prognostic abilities in a prospective cohort of HF patients. A prospective cohort of subjects from a single-center registry was analyzed with regard to baseline KCCQ and MLHFQ scores and the outcomes of death, transplant, or left ventricular assist device implantation and hospitalization. A total of 516 subjects with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) and 151 subjects with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) were included. Discrimination was assessed using c-statistics based on time-to-event analyses and receiver-operator curves. The additive contribution of MLHFQ was assessed through the change in c-statistic, incremental discrimination index, and category-free net reclassification index. Overall, KCCQ was superior to MLHFQ for predicting death/transplant/ventricular assist device (c-statistic 0.702 [0.666 to 0.738] and 0.658 [0.621 to 0.695] respectively, p value for difference <0.001) and hospitalization (c-statistic 0.640 [0.613 to 0.666] and 0.624 [0.597 to 0.651], respectively, p value for difference 0.022). However, this difference was statistically nonsignificant in the HFpEF group alone. When analyzing the additional prognostic information afforded by adding MLHFQ to KCCQ in the overall, HFrEF, and HFpEF groups there was no significant improvement, although adding KCCQ to MLHFQ did significantly improve risk stratification. Scoring based upon the abbreviated KCCQ-12 did not reduce the prognostic accuracy of KCCQ. In conclusion, KCCQ is more prognostic of death/transplant/left ventricular assist device and hospitalization than MLHFQ in a combined cohort of patients with HFrEF and HFpEF, although the effect in HFpEF was less pronounced. KCCQ should be the preferred PROM for patients with HF if prognostication is a desired goal of using the PROMs.

Project description:BackgroundHeart failure is a worldwide health problem that significantly affects patients' physical function and health state. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure commonly used for the assessment of health states of patients with heart failure. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the KCCQ.MethodsUsing pooled data of 141 Japanese patients with chronic heart failure from three clinical trials, the Japanese version of the KCCQ was evaluated for validity and reliability, with a focus on the clinical summary score (CSS) and its component domains. For construct validity, the associations of baseline KCCQ scores with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and the EuroQol five-dimension, three-level (EQ-5D-3L) scores at baseline were analyzed. For reliability, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability (reproducibility) was assessed among stable patients. Responsiveness to changes in patients' clinical status was assessed by analyzing score changes between two timepoints among patients whose health states improved.ResultsAmong 141 patients (mean age, 73.7 ± 10.9 years), 76.6% were NYHA class II at baseline. For CSS and its component domains (physical limitations, symptom frequency, and symptom severity), baseline scores were all significantly lower in patients with a higher NYHA class (p < 0.001 for all, Jonckheere-Terpstra test). The physical limitations domain and CSS showed a moderate correlation (Spearman's ρ = - 0.40 to - 0.54) with three functional status-related EQ-5D dimensions (mobility, self-care, and usual activities). The Cronbach's standardized α was high (> 0.70) for all KCCQ domain/summary scores. In the test-retest analysis among 58 stable patients, all domain/summary scores minimally changed by 0.3-4.2 points with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.65-0.84, demonstrating moderate to good reproducibility, except for the symptom stability domain. Among 44 patients with improved health states, all domain/summary scores except for the symptom stability and self-efficacy domains substantially improved from baseline with a medium to large effect size of 0.62-0.88.ConclusionsThe Japanese version of the KCCQ was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of symptoms and physical function of Japanese patients with chronic heart failure.