Suprameniscal Portal for Repairing Meniscal Root Tears.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Seifeldin AF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8252813 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Suprameniscal Portal for Repairing Meniscal Root Tears.
Seifeldin Ahmed Fouad AF Khedr Ahmed A
Arthroscopy techniques 20210524 6
Several techniques and portals have been described for meniscal root repairs. Some authors describe using anterior portals for suture passing and manipulation of meniscal tissue, with some risk of iatrogenic chondral injuries reported. Other authors describe using posterior portals to avoid this risk. In this technique, we used a suprameniscal portal, which allowed a good trajectory for passing sutures in the meniscal tissue with minimal risk of iatrogenic chondral damage without the need to use ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:The biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus are comparable to that of a complete meniscectomy. The integrity of the meniscal roots is crucial to enable the important function of load sharing and shock absorption. An untreated root tear leads to extrusion and loss of function of the meniscus causing early degenerative arthritis of the respective knee compartment. Meniscal root repair can be achieved by 2 main techniques: indirect fixation using pullout sutures through a transtibial tunnel with extracortical fixation and direct fixation using suture anchors. Pullout sutures are prone to elongation or abrasion of the suture material due to the length of the bone tunnel. Current suture anchor techniques are challenging as they require an additional posterior portal with higher risk of damage to neurovascular structures. Even with the use of specially designed curved passing devices, secure insertion of the anchor is difficult. We present a technique for suture anchor refixation of the posterior root of the medial meniscus without the need for an additional posterior portal.
| S-EPMC5984481 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo report changes in outcomes for these 3 treatment options for meniscal root tears.MethodsWe systematically searched databases including PubMed, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect for relevant articles. Criteria from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute was used for a quality assessment of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze changes in outcomes for meniscal repair.ResultsNineteen studies, 12 level III and 7 level IV, were included in this systematic review, with a total of 1086 patients. Conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following partial meniscectomy ranged from 11% to 54%, 31% to 35% for nonoperative, conservative treatment, and 0% to 1% for meniscal repair. Studies comparing repair with either meniscectomy or conservative treatment found greater improvement and slower progression of Kellgren-Lawrence grade with meniscal repair. A meta-analysis of the studies included in the systematic review using forest plots showed repair to have the greatest mean difference for functional outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm Activity Scale) and the lowest change in follow-up joint space.ConclusionsIn patients who experience meniscal root tears, meniscal repair may provide the greatest improvement in function and lowest risk of conversion to TKA when compared with partial meniscectomy or conservative methods. Partial meniscectomy appears to provide no benefit over conservative treatment, placing patients at a high risk of requiring TKA in the near future. However, future high-quality studies-both comparative studies and randomized trials-are needed to draw further conclusions and better impact treatment decision-making.Level of evidenceLevel IV, systematic review of level III and level IV evidence.
| S-EPMC7283958 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMeniscal root tears cause menisci and their insertions to inadequately distribute loads and potentially leave underlying articular cartilage unprotected. Untreated meniscal root tears are becoming increasingly recognized to induce joint degradation; however, little information is known about anterior meniscal root tears and how they affect joint tissue.PurposeTo observe the early degenerative changes within the synovial fluid, menisci, tibial articular cartilage, and subchondral bone after arthroscopic creation of untreated anterior meniscal root tears.Study designControlled laboratory study.MethodsAnterolateral meniscal root tears were created in 1 knee joint of 5 adult Flemish Giant rabbits, and anteromedial meniscal root tears were created in 4 additional rabbits. The contralateral limbs were used as nonoperated controls. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postoperatively; synovial fluid was aspirated, and tissue samples of menisci and tibial articular cartilage were collected and processed for multiple analyses to detect signs of early degeneration.ResultsSignificant changes were found within the synovial fluid, meniscal tissue, and tibial subchondral bone of the knees with anterior meniscal root tears when compared with controls. There were no significant changes identified in the tibial articular cartilage when comparing the tear groups with controls.ConclusionThis study demonstrated early degenerative changes within the synovial fluid, menisci, and tibial subchondral bone when leaving anterior meniscal root tears untreated for 8 weeks. The results suggest that meniscal tissue presents measurable, degenerative changes prior to changes within the articular cartilage after anterior meniscal root tears. Anterior destabilization of the meniscus arthroscopically may lead to measurable degenerative changes and be useful for future in vivo natural history and animal repair studies.Clinical relevanceThe present study is the first to investigate various tissue changes after anterior meniscal root tears of both the medial and lateral menisci. The results from this study suggest that degenerative changes occur within the synovial fluid, meniscus, and tibial subchondral bone prior to any measurable changes to the tibial articular cartilage. Further studies should expand on this study to evaluate how these components continue to progress when left untreated for long periods.
| S-EPMC5415046 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Meniscal tears are traditionally classified into traumatic versus degenerative tears. Although this classification plays a major role in clinical decision making, no consensus exists on the exact definition of a traumatic or degenerative tear, and the histopathological basis for this classification is unclear. PURPOSE:To assess the histological degree of meniscal degeneration in patients with a traumatic meniscal tear, as compared with intact meniscal tissue and osteoarthritic meniscal tissue. STUDY DESIGN:Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS:Traumatically torn meniscal tissue was collected during arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. As a control group, intact meniscal tissue was used from transfemoral amputations or direct postmortem dissections. Meniscal tissue from osteoarthritic knees was obtained during total knee replacement surgery. Meniscal tissue was processed, stained, and histologically analyzed with the Pauli scoring system (range, 0-18), comprising the subdomains surface integrity, cellularity, collagen organization, and matrix staining. Scoring was performed by 2 independent observers, blinded to condition, region, and patient data of the meniscus. RESULTS:The traumatic meniscal tear group contained 43 patients (34 men; median age, 29 years; median body mass index [BMI], 24 kg/m2); the intact meniscal tissue group, 8 patients (3 men; median age, 58 years; median BMI, 30 kg/m2); and the osteoarthritic group, 14 patients (4 men; median age, 66 years; median BMI, 28 kg/m2). After adjustment for sex, age, and BMI, patients with a traumatic meniscal tear had a significantly higher histological score than patients with intact meniscal tissue (2.7-point difference; P = .035). Histological score between the traumatic and osteoarthritic groups was not different. CONCLUSION:Traumatically torn menisci possess a higher degree of degeneration than intact menisci. Our results suggest that patients with a traumatic meniscal tear may already have had a certain degree of meniscal degeneration. These findings potentially challenge the classic view of traumatic versus degenerative meniscal tears. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:Our findings provide a better understanding of the tissue condition of a torn meniscus. This knowledge may help clinicians decide on choice of treatment and may lead to new perspectives to prevent knee osteoarthritis in patients with a torn meniscus.
| S-EPMC7401187 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Transtibial pullout suture (TPS) repair of posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) tears was shown to achieve good clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanically, a novel technique designed to repair PMMR tears using tendon graft (TG) and conventional TPS repair. Twelve porcine tibiae (n = 6 each) TG group: flexor digitorum profundus tendon was passed through an incision in the root area, created 5 mm postero-medially along the edge of the attachment area. TPS group: a modified Mason-Allen suture was created using no. 2 FiberWire. The tendon grafts and sutures were threaded through the bone tunnel and then fixed to the anterolateral cortex of the tibia. The two groups underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacements of the constructs after 100, 500, and 1000 loading cycles, and the maximum load, stiffness, and elongation at failure were recorded. The TG technique had significantly lower elongation and higher stiffness compared with the TPS. The maximum load of the TG group was significantly lower than that of the TPS group. Failure modes for all specimens were caused by the suture or graft cutting through the meniscus. Lesser elongation and higher stiffness of the constructs in TG technique over those in the standard TPS technique might be beneficial for postoperative biological healing between the meniscus and tibial plateau. However, a slower rehabilitation program might be necessary due to its relatively lower maximum failure load.
| S-EPMC5800675 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Meniscal root tears occur in isolation or concurrently with ligamentous knee injury and cause significantly altered knee mechanics with the loss of normal meniscus hoop stress. This loss of normal meniscus function can result in abnormal knee kinematics and, subsequently, more rapid degenerative changes of the knee articular surface. In the setting of anterior cruciate ligament tear, the posterolateral meniscus root is most commonly damaged. Several techniques exist for meniscus root repair; however, none have been shown to be clearly superior. We present a safe, effective, and reproducible arthroscopic transtibial technique for posterior horn lateral meniscal root tears.
| S-EPMC5382354 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo quantify the amount of strain across an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) before and after a lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root complex tear and determine whether a meniscal root repair effectively protects the ACLR against excessive strain.MethodsFresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested with an 88-N anterior drawer force and an internal and external torque of 5-Nm applied at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. A simulated pivot shift was also applied at 0, 15, and 30° of flexion. Rotation and translation of the tibia, and strain across the ACL graft were recorded. Testing was repeated for the following four conditions: ACL-intact, ACLR with intact LM, ACLR with LM posterior root complex tear, and ACLR with root repair.ResultsThe kinematic data from 12 fresh frozen cadaveric knees underwent analysis. Only 11 specimens had usable strain data. Sectioning the meniscofemoral ligaments and the LM posterior root increased rotational and translational laxity at 30° of knee flexion. ACLR graft strain significantly increased when an anterior load and internal torque were applied. Repair of the LM posterior root reduced strain when the knee was internally rotated but was unable to normalize strain when an anterior force was applied.ConclusionsThis cadaveric biomechanical study suggests injury to the LM posterior root complex increases rotational and anterior laxity of the knee and places increased strain across reconstructed ACL grafts. Subsequent root repair did not result in a statistically significant reduction in strain.Clinical relevanceThis study provides quantitative data on the implications of a LM posterior root injury in the setting of an ACL reconstruction to help guide clinical decision-making.
| S-EPMC8129456 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the incidence of complete lateral meniscal posterior root tears (LMPRTs) repaired at revision as compared with primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (PACLR) and to determine whether other demographic or surgical characteristics were associated with LMPRTs needing repair.MethodsA chart review was performed to identify the PACLR and revision ACL reconstruction (RACLR) cohorts. Demographic and surgical characteristics were recorded. Cases with concurrent lateral meniscal posterior root repair were identified. Cases were classified as acute (<5 months) or chronic (>5 months) based on the time from reported injury to surgery. Tunnel malposition in revision cases was recorded if either tunnel or both tunnels were malpositioned on radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging.ResultsData from 167 cases, 140 PACLR and 27 RACLR cases, were included. The cohorts had similar demographic characteristics including age, sex, and lateral meniscal injury. The overall incidence of lateral meniscal root repair in ACL reconstruction patients was 12.6% (21 of 167 patients). The incidence of LMPRT repair was 7.1% (10 of 140 patients) in the PACLR cohort versus 40.7% (11 of 27 patients) in the RACLR cohort. The revision cohort was significantly more likely to have a chronic injury (66.7% [18 of 27 patients] vs 31.4% [44 of 140 patients]). The most significant predictor of concurrent lateral meniscal posterior root repair was RACLR versus PACLR for both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (χ2 = 20.603; P < .0001; odds ratio, 13.887; 95% confidence interval, 1.531-125.993). Analysis of tunnel positions for the revision group revealed that PACLR tunnel malposition was a significant predictor of LMPRTs (χ2 = 4.91, P = .027).ConclusionsComplete LMPRTs warranting repair are encountered with a significantly greater frequency at RACLR as compared with PACLR. The overall incidence of LMPRT repair at RACLR is high. In this cohort, LMPRT repair in RACLR cases was associated with tunnel malposition of the PACLR.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.
| S-EPMC8129033 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This retrospective study was conducted to analyse the reliability of clinical diagnosis in meniscal tear injuries. All patients attending our clinic with knee pain from January 2003 to December 2004 underwent systematic and thorough clinical assessment. One hundred and fifty patients were clinically diagnosed to have meniscal tears. All these patients underwent therapeutic arthroscopic knee surgery. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed during this procedure. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on these arthroscopic findings. The accuracy of clinical diagnosis in our study was 88% for medial meniscal tears and 92% for lateral meniscal tears. The results of this study demonstrate that clinical diagnosis of meniscal tears is as reliable as the results published by other authors for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. We recommend the use of MRI for more doubtful, difficult and complex knee injuries.
| S-EPMC2267536 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundThe adverse consequences of medial meniscus posterior root tears have become increasingly familiar to surgeons, and treatment strategies have become increasingly abundant. In this paper, the finite element gait analysis method was used to explore the differences in the biomechanical characteristics of the knee joint under different conditions.MethodsBased on CT computed tomography and MR images, (I) an intact knee (IK) model with bone, cartilage, meniscus and main ligaments was established. Based on this model, the posterior root of the medial meniscus was resected, and (ii) the partial tear (PT) model, (iii) the entire radial tear (ERT) model, and (iv) the entire oblique tear (EOT) model were established according to the scope and degree of resection. Then, the (v) meniscus repair (MR) model and (vi) partial meniscectomy (PM) model were developed according to the operation method. The differences in stress, displacement and contact area among different models were evaluated under ISO gait loading conditions.ResultsUnder gait loading, there was no significant difference in the maximum stress of the medial and lateral tibiofemoral joints among the six models. Compared with the medial tibiofemoral joint stress of the IK model, the stress of the PM model increased by 8.3%, while that of the MR model decreased by 18.9%; at the same time, the contact stress of the medial tibiofemoral joint of the ERT and EOT models increased by 17.9 and 25.3%, respectively. The displacement of the medial meniscus in the ERT and EOT models was significantly larger than that in the IK model (P < 0.05), and the tibial and femoral contact areas of these two models were lower than those of the IK model (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe integrity of the posterior root of the medial meniscus plays an important role in maintaining normal tibial-femoral joint contact mechanics. Partial meniscectomy is not beneficial for improving the tibial-thigh contact situation. Meniscal repair has a positive effect on restoring the normal biomechanical properties of the medial meniscus.
| S-EPMC9749342 | biostudies-literature