Single-Bundle Anatomical Hardware-Free Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhao J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8252817 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a reasonable transition from isometric ACL reconstruction to obtain better clinical outcomes, and most authors believe that it can only be performed through the medial portal technique. However, in our clinical practice, we found that anatomical ACL reconstruction can be performed easily and accurately by creating a tibial tunnel, which is accomplished by setting the tibial tunnel with correct angulation to the sagittal plane and tibial axis. Hence, we introduce this special transtibial anatomical ACL reconstruction technique, in which the most critical step is the creation of a shallow tibial tunnel with a proximal projection to the anatomical location of the femoral tunnel. This technique is indicated for primary ACL reconstructions in skeletally mature patients. We believe this Technical Note will give a special view on anatomical ACL reconstruction.
| S-EPMC7528436 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Remnant always exists following injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). To improve the clinical outcomes of PCL reconstruction, preservation of the remnant has long been a consideration. However, how to make the remnant-preservation technique simple and more effective is of concern. We describe a single-bundle anatomical PCL reconstruction technique with remnant preservation in which the posteromedial and posterolateral portals are used, the graft is placed at the lateral side of the remnant, and pulleys are used to facilitate graft passage at the 2 killer turns of the grafting routes. We consider introduction of this technique will provide reasonable choices in PCL reconstruction.
| S-EPMC8556646 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The outcomes of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction leave room for improvement. We hope to augment double-bundle ACL reconstruction with the reconstruction of an ACL-mimicking anterolateral structure (ALS). Thus, we would like to introduce a combined double-bundle ACL reconstruction and ACL-mimicking ALS reconstruction technique. The main indication for this technique is ACL injury with a high degree of pivot shift test, general laxity, or near critical value of the posterior tibial slope. The main steps in this technique include preparation of an isolated graft for the anteromedial bundle of the ACL and a combined graft for the posterolateral bundle of the ACL and ALS, creation of three tibial tunnels and two femoral tunnels, graft placement, and final graft fixation at an adjustable loop. We have obtained promising clinical outcomes with this technique and consider that this report will provide new options in ACL reconstruction.
| S-EPMC7451438 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction associated with an anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructions is performed. The semitendinosus and gracilis are harvested. At knee maximum flexion, the anteromedial (AM) femoral tunnel is performed in the AM footprint area. Through the anterolateral portal, the tip of the outside-in femoral guide is placed in the posterolateral footprint area. The guide sleeve is pushed onto the lateral femoral cortex at the ALL attachment. At 110° knee flexion, the posterolateral-ALL tunnel is performed. The tibial ACL tunnel is performed as usual. The tibial guide is placed between the ALL tibial attachment and the tibial ACL tunnel entrance to perform the ALL tibial tunnel. The gracilis graft is introduced from caudal to cranial, achieving fixation with a 6-mm diameter screw (outside-in). The AM femoral fixation is achieved with a suspension device. ACL tibial graft fixation is achieved with a screw. Afterward, the gracilis is passed under the fascia lata to the tibial entry point. A 6-mm diameter screw is placed from the external cortex into the tibial ALL tunnel. The biomechanical advantage of the double-bundle ACL reconstruction with the biomechanical advantage of the ALL anatomic reconstruction is achieved.
| S-EPMC6112256 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Various degree of remnant tissues exists following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Making use of these tissues may be helpful for the reconstructed ACL from many aspects. There are many methods of remnant preservation and use, as well as many types of combined ACL reconstruction. However, the most effective methods of remnant reuse as well as ACL reconstruction are still being pursued. We introduce an anatomical double-bundle transtibial ACL reconstruction with in-between remnant preservation technique named sandwich-style ACL reconstruction. The indication of this technique is complete ACL tear with a large volume of connectable remnant. The main tricks of this technique are proper ligation of the remnant, proper location of the anteromedial-bundle tibial tunnels, and passing the anteromedial bundle through the shallow side of the remnant. We believe the introduction of this technique will provide more options for remnant preservation and ACL reconstruction.
| S-EPMC8085440 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been a standard procedure. However, residual rotary instability in approximately 20% of the cases (irrespective of the graft choice and the surgical technique) forces the surgeon to improve the biomechanical quality of the reconstruction. In parallel, adjustable suspensory fixation (ASF) devices have arisen. Biomechanics has defined (both anatomical and functional) the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles that work synergistically. In the unsymmetrical "anatomic" SB ACL reconstruction, the distribution of the ACL graft fibers (for AM or PL behavior) is not under the control of the surgeon. Furthermore, different sizes of the original footprints (depending on height) suggest the need to customize the graft footprint. This customization is only possible if distances are measured during surgical procedures. We present an inside-out technique for DB ACL reconstruction ("all-inside" also possible). Semitendinosus is folded to obtain a Y-shaped trifurcate configuration graft, distributing their bundles in two different areas. Used as measuring instruments, we used the "offset" guides as measuring instruments, allowing the surgeon to know the distance between the centers of the AM and PL tunnels. It may be carried out by means of common "offset" guides and any marketed ASF devices, while generating customized footprints.ClassificationI: knee; II: ACL.
| S-EPMC8417341 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (DBACLR) is a reasonable transition from single-bundle ACL reconstruction to obtain better clinical outcomes, and most authors believe that it can only be performed through a medial portal. However, in our clinical practice, we have found that anatomic DBACLR can be performed easily and exactly through transtibial tunnels just by positioning the tibial tunnels appropriately. Thus, we would like to introduce this anatomic double-bundle transtibial ACL reconstruction technique, in which the most critical step is to create a shallow tibial tunnel for the anteromedial bundle with a proximal projection to the anatomic location of the corresponding femoral tunnel. We believe this Technical Note will give an interesting view of anatomic DBACLR.
| S-EPMC7953165 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are still unsatisfactory. Anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has been applied to augment ACL reconstruction, with better but still nonoptimal results. An anatomical analysis revealed that the route of ALL is quite different from that of ACL on the lateral view of the knee. Thus, we hope to augment ACL reconstruction with the reconstruction of an ACL-mimicking anterolateral structure, in which the route is similar to that of ACL. Thus, we aimed to introduce a combined ACL and ACL-mimicking anterolateral structure reconstruction technique, which we named condyle-pinching double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The main indication of this technique is ACL injury with a high degree of pivot shift or general laxity. The main steps of this technique include preparation of a combined graft, creation of a common femoral tunnel and 2 tibial tunnels, graft placement, and final graft fixation to an adjustable loop. We have been obtaining obvious outcome improvement clinically with this technique and consider that this report will provide special option in ACL reconstruction.
| S-EPMC7451757 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cadaveric and clinical biomechanical studies show improved kinematic restoration using double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques. These have been criticized in the past for being technically challenging. We present a novel 3-socket approach for anatomic "all-inside" double-bundle reconstruction using a single hamstring tendon fashioned to create a trifurcate graft: the TriLink technique. The semitendinosus alone is harvested, quadrupled, and attached to 3 suspensory fixation devices in a Y-shaped configuration, creating a 4-stranded tibial limb and 2 double-stranded femoral limbs. A medial viewing/lateral working arthroscopic approach is adopted using specifically designed instrumentation. Anatomic placement of the 2 femoral tunnels is performed by a validated direct measurement technique. A single mid-bundle position is used on the tibia. Both femoral and tibial sockets are created in a retrograde manner using outside-to-in drilling. This is a simplified operative technique for anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction that maximizes bone preservation. The TriLink construct replicates the 2 bundles of the ACL, conferring native functional anisometry and improving femoral footprint coverage while avoiding the complexities and pitfalls of double-tibial tunnel techniques. Preservation of the gracilis reduces the morbidity of hamstring harvest and allows greater flexibility in graft choice in cases requiring multiligament reconstruction.
| S-EPMC3986474 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:The factors that influence functions of knees after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) still remains uncertain. The functional restoration of knees after ACLR can be reflected on gait kinematics restoration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the gait kinematics and clinical outcomes of knees after anatomical and non-anatomical single-bundle ACLR during level walking. Methods:Thirty-four patients with unilateral primary single-bundle ACLR and 18 healthy people were recruited. Patients were divided into anatomical reconstruction group (AR group; n=13) and non-anatomical reconstruction group (Non-AR group; n=21) according to Bernard Quadrant method. The ACL graft orientations on coronal and sagittal planes were measured on 3D models from medical images. The 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) kinematics of knees and range of motion (ROM) of 6 DOF kinematics were measured with a portable optical tracking system. The comparison of 6 DOF kinematics and ROM of 6 DOF kinematics were performed between the ACLR knees and contralateral knees. The following assessments were also performed including clinical examination, KT-2000 arthrometer measurement, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores. Results:All patients reached a minimum follow-up of 6 months (10±4 months). For AR group and Non-AR group, no statistically significant differences were observed in gait kinematics between the ACLR knees and contralateral knees. No statistically significant differences between the ACLR knees and contralateral knees were observed in terms of ROM of 6 DOF kinematics in AR group. However, in Non-AR group, the ACLR knees exhibited significant ROM of anterior-posterior translation by approximately 0.5 cm than contralateral knees (P=0.0080). No statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed regarding IKDC subjective score, Lysholm score and KT-2000 arthrometer test. Conclusions:The anatomical ACLR can restore close to normal gait kinematics and ROM of 6 DOF kinematics compared with non-anatomical ACLR. The ACL graft after anatomical ACLR simulated native ACL fibers to function in terms of graft orientation.
| S-EPMC6989884 | biostudies-literature