Dataset Information

Prospective Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D-Printed Triangular Titanium Implants: 24-Month Follow-Up.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Strong evidence supports minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion using triangular titanium implants (TTI) for chronic SIJ dysfunction.

Objective

To report safety and effectiveness of SIJF using a 3D-printed TTI at 24 months.

Methods

SIJF with TTI was performed in 51 subjects. Structured follow-up occurred at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Both quality of life questionnaires and functional tests were performed at all study visits.

Results

84% of subjects were available for 24-month follow-up. Observed were rapid and persistent improvements in dysfunction due to pain (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], mean 52.8 at baseline and 28.3 at 24 months, p<0.0001) and SIJ pain ratings (mean 78.5 at baseline [0-100 scale] to 21.5 at 24 months). Opioid use for SIJ pain decreased markedly from baseline. Physical function tests impaired by SIJ pain showed persistent improvements compared to baseline. There was no evidence of device breakage, migration or subsidence and few late adverse events occurred attributable to the device.

Conclusion

In this prospective study, SIJF using 3D-printed TTI resulted in immediate, marked and persistent improvements in pain and quality of life, with improved physical function, reduced opioid use and a low rate of late device-related adverse events.

Level of evidence

Level II.

SUBMITTER: Patel V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8254553 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSacroiliac (SI) joint pain is a prevalent, underdiagnosed cause of lower back pain. SI joint fusion can relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients who have failed nonoperative care. To date, no study has concurrently compared surgical and non-surgical treatments for chronic SI joint dysfunction.MethodsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of 148 subjects with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or sacroiliac joint disruptions who were assigned to either minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants (N=102) or non-surgical management (NSM, n=46). SI joint pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) were collected at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment commencement. Six-month success rates, defined as the proportion of treated subjects with a 20-mm improvement in SI joint pain in the absence of severe device-related or neurologic SI joint-related adverse events or surgical revision, were compared using Bayesian methods.ResultsSubjects (mean age 51, 70% women) were highly debilitated at baseline (mean SI joint VAS pain score 82, mean ODI score 62). Six-month follow-up was obtained in 97.3%. By 6 months, success rates were 81.4% in the surgical group vs. 23.9% in the NSM group (difference of 56.6%, 95% posterior credible interval 41.4-70.0%, posterior probability of superiority >0.999). Clinically important (≥15 point) ODI improvement at 6 months occurred in 75% of surgery subjects vs. 27.3% of NSM subjects. At six months, quality of life improved more in the surgery group and satisfaction rates were high. The mean number of adverse events in the first six months was slightly higher in the surgical group compared to the non-surgical group (1.3 vs. 1.0 events per subject, p=0.1857).ConclusionsSix-month follow-up from this level 1 study showed that minimally invasive SI joint fusion using triangular titanium implants was more effective than non-surgical management in relieving pain, improving function and improving quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or SI joint disruptions.Clinical relevanceMinimally invasive SI joint fusion is an acceptable option for patients with chronic SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruptions unresponsive to non-surgical treatments.

Project description:ObjectiveThe aim was to identify the cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MI SIJF) surgery with titanium triangular implants for patients with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain who have failed conservative management, compared to non-surgical management (NSM) from a National Health Service (NHS) England perspective.MethodsOver a time horizon of 5 years, a cohort state transition model compared the costs and outcomes of treating patients with MI SIJF to those of traditional NSM treatment pathways. The NSM arm included two treatments: grouped physical therapy and corticosteroid injections (PTSI) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Three different strategies were considered: (1) a stepped pathway, (2) patients split between PTSI and RFA, and (3) RFA only. The outcome measure was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), reported in 2018 British pounds per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to test the robustness of the model results.ResultsPatients undergoing MI SIJF accrued total procedure-related and pain-management costs of £8358, while NSM treatment strategy 1 had total costs of £6880. The MI SIJF cohort had 2.98 QALYs compared to strategy 1 with 2.30 QALYs. This resulted in an ICER for MI SIJF versus strategy 1 of £2164/QALY gained. Strategy 2 of the NSM arm had lower costs than strategy 1 (£6564) and 2.26 QALYs, and this resulted in an ICER of £2468/QALY gained for MI SIJF. Strategy 3 of the NSM arm had lower costs than strategy 1 (£6580), and this resulted in 2.28 QALYs and an ICER of £2518/QALY gained for MI SIJF. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that at a threshold of £20,000/QALY gained, MI SIJF has a probability of being cost-effective versus NSM strategies of 96%, 97%, and 91% for strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively.ConclusionMI SIJF appears to be cost-effective over a 5-year time horizon when compared to traditional NSM pathways in an NHS context.

Project description:BackgroundMinimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) has become an increasingly accepted surgical option for chronic sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction, a prevalent cause of unremitting low back/buttock pain.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to report clinical and functional outcomes of SIJF using triangular titanium implants (TTI) in the treatment of chronic SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or sacroiliac joint (SIJ) disruption at 3 years postoperatively.MethodsA total of 103 subjects with SIJ dysfunction at 12 centers were treated with TTI in two prospective clinical trials (NCT01640353 and NCT01681004) and enrolled in this long-term follow-up study (NCT02270203). Subjects were evaluated in study clinics at study start and again at 3, 4, and 5 years.ResultsMean (SD) preoperative SIJ pain score was 81.5, and mean preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was 56.3. At 3 years, mean pain SIJ pain score decreased to 26.2 (a 55-point improvement from baseline, p<0.0001). At 3 years, mean ODI was 28.2 (a 28-point improvement from baseline, p<0.0001). In all, 82% of subjects were very satisfied with the procedure at 3 years. EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) time trade-off index improved by 0.30 points (p<0.0001). No adverse events definitely related to the study device or procedure were reported; one subject underwent revision surgery at year 3.7. SIJ pain contralateral to the originally treated side occurred in 15 subjects of whom four underwent contralateral SIJF. The proportion of subjects who were employed outside the home full- or part-time at 3 years decreased somewhat from baseline (p=0.1814), and the proportion of subjects who would have the procedure again was lower at 3 years compared to earlier time points.ConclusionIn long-term (3-year) follow-up, minimally invasive trans-iliac SIJF with TTI was associated with improved pain, disability, and quality of life with relatively high satisfaction rates.Level of evidenceLevel II.Clinical relevanceSIJF with TTI.

Project description:BackgroundFor patients undergoing long-construct fusion surgeries, simultaneous sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is a growing trend in spine surgery. Some options for posterior SIJ fusion include 3D-printed triangular titanium implants or self-harvesting SIJ screws. Both implants require fixation within the sacrum and ileum. Fat embolism syndrome is a rare but known complication of lumbar pedicle instrumentation but has never been reported in association with SIJ fusion, regardless of implant type. We report the first two known cases of fat embolism associated with placement of SIJ fusion devices during long construct posterior spine fusion.Case descriptionCase 1-a 50-year-old female with multiple previous spine surgeries complicated by osteomyelitis/diskitis that was successfully eradicated, underwent T10-pelvis posterior spinal fusion (PSF), L4 pedicle-subtracting-osteotomy, and bilateral SIJ fusion. During implantation of each SIJ fusion device, the patient's hemodynamic status deteriorated necessitating vasopressor support, intravenous fluid bolus, and hyperventilation, but quickly resolved. The case was completed without further issue, and she had an uneventful post-operative course. Case 2-a 71-year-old female with a past medical history of ankylosing spondylitis, previous L2-L5 PSF, rheumatoid arthritis on chronic steroids, underwent a T9-pelvis PSF, bilateral SIJ fusion, L4 pedicle subtraction osteotomy, T10-L1 Smith Peterson osteotomies. After implantation of the second SIJ fusion device, she became hypotensive and tachycardic, pulses were absent, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated. Pulses returned quickly, the index surgery was terminated, and she was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). In the ICU she was quickly weaned off the ventilator on post-operative day 1. On post-operative day 4, the patient returned to the operating room for completion of the surgery and had an extended, but uneventful, recovery afterwards.ConclusionsWe report on the first two known cases of fat embolism syndrome occurring immediately after implantation of SIJ fusion devices. Spine surgeons should be aware of this rare, but potentially fatal, complication. Collaboration with the anesthesia team and optimization of the patient's hemodynamic status prior to implantation may help prevent catastrophic complications.