Dataset Information

Validation of LensHooke® X1 PRO and Computer-Assisted Semen Analyzer Compared with Laboratory-Based Manual Semen Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To compare two automated semen quality analysis systems (LensHooke® X1 PRO [X1 PRO]) and IVOS CASA) for accuracy, precision and agreement with laboratory-based manual semen analysis (MSA).

Materials and methods

Semen samples (n=31) were obtained from normozoospermic healthy male volunteers and infertile men with a minimum abstinence period between 2-3 days. After complete liquefaction, 101 seminal aliquots were prepared and tested according to WHO 5th Edition (2010) guidelines. The results obtained by X1 PRO and IVOS CASA were compared with that of MSA. Additionally, 10 samples were used to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater agreement for X1 PRO and MSA.

Results

The semen parameters (sperm concentration, total, and progressive motility) showed strong correlation and agreement for both automated semen analyzers and MSA (Spearman's rank correlation ≥0.92, p<0.0001). X1 PRO and IVOS CASA were able to differentiate samples with abnormal concentration with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%. Furthermore, the PPV for X1 PRO (86.5%) was higher than that for IVOS CASA (71.7%) in differentiating samples with abnormal motility. The X1 PRO device showed a high PPV (97.7%) in identifying normal sperm forms compared to MSA. Semen parameters evaluated showed a high inter-rater (kappa >0.91) and intra-rater (kappa >0.92) agreement for X1 PRO compared with MSA.

Conclusions

Both automated semen analyzers demonstrated a high level of concordance and their performance was comparable with MSA analysis. Furthermore, high-levels of inter-and intra-rater reliability for semen analysis indicate that the new X1 PRO can be used in a clinical laboratory to offer accurate and quick test results.

SUBMITTER: Agarwal A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8255407 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Computer-Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA) enables reliable analysis of semen images, and is designed to process large number of images with high consistency, accuracy, and repeatability. Design and testing of CASA algorithms can be accelerated greatly if reliable simulations of semen images under a variety of conditions and sample quality modes are available. Using life-like simulation of semen images can quantify the performance of existing and proposed CASA algorithms, since the parameters of the simulated image are known and controllable. We present simulation models for sperm cell image and swimming modes observed in real 2D (top-down) images of sperm cells in laboratory specimen. The models simulate human sperm using four (4) types of swimming, namely linear mean, circular, hyperactive, and immotile (or dead). The simulation models are used in studying algorithms for segmentation, localization, and tracking of sperm cells. Several segmentation and localization algorithms were tested under varying levels of noise, and then compared using precision, recall, and the optimal subpattern assignment (OSPA) metric. Images of real human semen sample were used to validate the segmentation and localization observations obtained from simulations. An example is given of sperm cell tracking on simulated semen images of cells using the different tracking algorithms (nearest neighbor (NN), global nearest neighbor (GNN), probabilistic data association filter (PDAF), and joint probabilistic data association filter (JPDAF)). Tracking performance was evaluated through multi-object tracking precision (MOTP) and multi-object tracking accuracy (MOTA). Simulation models enable objective assessments of semen image processing algorithms. We demonstrate the use of a new simulation tool to assess and compare segmentation, localization, and tracking methods. The simulation software allows testing along a large spectrum of parameter values that control the appearance and behavior of simulated semen images. Users can generate scenarios of different characteristics and assess the effectiveness of different CASA algorithms in these environments. The simulation was used to assess and compare algorithms for segmentation and tracking of sperm cells in semen images.

Project description:BackgroundEH-2090 is Mindray's new-generation fully automatic urine formed element analyzer (hereinafter referred to as EH-2090). Currently, there are no studies on EH-2090, so we evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of this instrument to verify that it can meet daily clinical needs, and used manual microscopy as a reference method.MethodsThe analytical performance of the EH-2090 was first evaluated for repeatability, linearity, reproducibility, and carryover. We collected urine samples from outpatient and inpatient departments of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital. Uncentrifuged urine was compared with the EH-2090 using the Fuchs-Rosenthal counting method-a quantitative reference method for microscopy-for comparative studies in terms of red blood cell (RBC) and white blood cell (WBC) counting accuracy. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was performed for RBC and WBC counts. Two laboratory technicians performed centrifugation and manual analysis (microscopy) to evaluate its performance at detecting RBCs, WBCs, and casts, sensitivities and specificities were calculated.ResultsThe EH-2090's between-run reproducibility, within-day reproducibility, between-day reproducibility, and within-laboratory reproducibility for formed components of urine all met the laboratory requirements. There was a good correlation between the counting accuracy of RBCs (r=0.965, P<0.0001) and WBCs (r=0.894, P<0.0001) by the EH-2090 and the Fuchs-Rosenthal method. The positive coincidence rates of RBC and manual microscopy were 86.08% and 92.41%, respectively, and the negative coincidence rates were 88.39% and 85.81%, respectively. The positive coincidence rates before and after the WBC review were 89.33% and 92.00%, respectively, whereas the negative ones were 77.64% and 83.23%, respectively. The positive coincidence rates before and after cast review were 77.78% and 82.05%, respectively, and the negative ones were 97.09% and 93.60%, respectively.ConclusionsThe EH-2090 has good analytical and clinical performance. Its RBC and WBC counting accuracy correlates well with the quantitative reference method of microscopy.