Dataset Information

Utility of interferon gamma/tumor necrosis factor alpha FluoroSpot assay in differentiation between active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection: a pilot study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The differential diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) remains challenging in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the IFN-γ/TNF-α FluoroSpot assay for differentiating ATB from LTBI.

Methods

We conducted a pilot study of case-control design, using the FluoroSpot assay to simultaneously detect IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion at the single-cell level. The frequencies of antigen-specific single TNF-α-, total TNF-α-, single IFN-γ-, total IFN-γ- and dual IFN-γ/TNF-α-secreting T cells were detected. The optimal cutoffs value of frequencies for differentiating ATB from LTBI were determined according to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV) and likelihood ratios (LR) of the FluoroSpot assay were calculated.

Results

Thirty patients diagnosed microbiologically with ATB, 36 healthcare workers with LTBI and 36 healthy controls were enrolled. After stimulated by ESAT-6 or CFP-10 peptides, the median frequencies of single TNF-α-, total TNF-α-, single IFN-γ-, total IFN-γ- and dual IFN-γ/TNF-α-secreting T cells in ATB patients were all significantly higher than those in LTBI and HC groups (P < 0.01). The frequencies of total IFN-γ-secreting T cells detected by FluoroSpot assay correlated significantly with those of T-SPOT.TB (r = 0.910 for ESAT-6, P < 0.001, r = 0.845 for CFP-10, P < 0.001). After stimulated by ESAT-6 peptides, with total TNF-α-secreting T cells frequencies at a cut off value of 21 iSFCs/250,000 PBMCs, the sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, PPV, NPV of IFN-γ/TNF-α FluoroSpot assay in differentiating ATB from LTBI were 96.7% (95%CI, 82.8-99.9%), 94.3% (95%CI, 80.8-99.3%), 16.92 (95%CI, 4.40-65.08), 0.04 (95%CI, 0.01-0.24), 93.6% (95%CI,78.6-99.2%) and 97.1% (95%CI, 84.7-99.9%), respectively. With the frequencies of total TNF-α- and total IFN-γ-secreting T cells stimulated by ESAT-6 peptides combined, the specificity was increased to 97.1%, and the positive likelihood ratio to 31.5. The combination with CFP-10 might not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the ESAT-6 for differentiating ATB from LTBI.

Conclusions

IFN-γ/TNF-α FluoroSpot assay might have potential to help differentiate ATB from LTBI, but the findings need to be further verified by cross-sectional or prospective cohort studies.

SUBMITTER: Zhang L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8259141 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAccurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is essential for TB elimination. However, the absence of a gold standard test for diagnosing LTBI makes assessment of the true prevalence of LTBI and the accuracy of diagnostic tests challenging. Bayesian latent class models can be used to make inferences about disease prevalence and the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using data on the concordance between tests. We performed the largest meta-analysis to date aiming to evaluate the performance of tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) for LTBI diagnosis in various patient populations using Bayesian latent class modelling.MethodsSystematic search of PubMeb, Embase and African Index Medicus was conducted without date and language restrictions on September 11, 2017 to identify studies that compared the performance of TST and IGRAs for LTBI diagnosis. Two IGRA methods were considered: QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube (QFT-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB. Studies were included if they reported 2x2 agreement data between TST and QFT-GIT or T-SPOT.TB. A Bayesian latent class model was developed to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of TST and IGRAs in various populations, including immune-competent adults, immune-compromised adults and children. A TST cut-off value of 10 mm was used for immune-competent subjects and 5 mm for immune-compromised individuals.FindingsA total of 157 studies were included in the analysis. In immune-competent adults, the sensitivity of TST and QFT-GIT were estimated to be 84% (95% credible interval [CrI] 82-85%) and 52% (50-53%), respectively. The specificity of QFT-GIT was 97% (96-97%) in non-BCG-vaccinated and 93% (92-94%) in BCG-vaccinated immune-competent adults. The estimated figures for TST were 100% (99-100%) and 79% (76-82%), respectively. T-SPOT.TB has comparable specificity (97% for both tests) and better sensitivity (68% versus 52%) than QFT-GIT in immune-competent adults. In immune-compromised adults, both TST and QFT-GIT display low sensitivity but high specificity. QFT-GIT and TST are equally specific (98% for both tests) in non-BCG-vaccinated children; however, QFT-GIT is more specific than TST (98% versus 82%) in BCG-vaccinated group. TST is more sensitive than QFT-GIT (82% versus 73%) in children.ConclusionsThis study is the first to assess the utility of TST and IGRAs for LTBI diagnosis in different population groups using all available data with Bayesian latent class modelling. Our results challenge the current beliefs about the performance of LTBI screening tests, and have important implications for LTBI screening policy and practice. We estimated that the performance of IGRAs is not as reliable as previously measured in the general population. However, IGRAs are not or minimally affected by BCG and should be the preferred tests in this setting. Adoption of IGRAs in settings where BCG is widely administered will allow for a more accurate identification and treatment of LTBI.

Project description:BackgroundThe Mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HBHA) is an important latency-associated antigen that can be used to distinguish between latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (ATB). Although many studies were explored the efficiency of the HBHA-induced interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) in different populations, the clinical differential value of HBHA-IGRA is still controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether the HBHA-IGRA can be used as an efficient test for the discrimination of LTBI and ATB by a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on Oct 18, 2020, with no start date limitation. The quality of each study was evaluated using Review Manager 5.4. The Stata MP v.14.0 software was used to combine sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under SROC (AUC) to evaluate the diagnostic value of HBHA-IGRA for discrimination of LTBI and ATB. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed for the sources of heterogeneity based on the selection criteria for active TB, the population, the TB burden, the type of antigen, the type of sample, and the time of antigen stimulation.ResultsA total of 13 studies (14 results) were included in this meta-analysis, including 603 ATB patients and 514 LTBI individuals. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the HBHA-IGRA for discrimination of the LTBI and ATB were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57~0.80) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71~0.84), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 3.15 (95%CI, 2.43~4.09), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.27~0.56), and 8.11 (95% CI, 4.81~13.67), respectively. The AUC was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77~0.84). The subgroup analysis showed that the main source of heterogeneity was due to the HIV-infected population incorporated, and the different selection criteria of active TB subjects would also lead to the variation of the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Different TB burdens, HBHA antigen types, sample types, antigen stimulation time and BCG vaccination did not affect the heterogeneity in this analysis.ConclusionThe HBHA-IGRA is a promising immunodiagnostic test for discrimination of latent and active TB, which can be added in commercial IGRAs to enhance the differential diagnostic performance.