Dataset Information

Optimal Timing of Tracheostomy in Injured Adolescents.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To evaluate the optimal timing of tracheostomy for injured adolescents.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Trauma facilities in the United States.

Patients

Adolescents (age 12-17 yr) in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2016) who were ventilated for greater than 24 hours and survived to discharge.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and main results

After stratifying by traumatic brain injury diagnosis, we compared ICU and hospital length of stay, pneumonia, and discharge disposition of patients with tracheostomy prior to three cut points (3, 7, and 14 d after admission) to 1) patients intubated at least as long as each cut point and 2) patients with tracheostomy on or after each cut point. Of 11,045 patients, 1,391 (12.6%) underwent tracheostomy. Median time to tracheostomy was 9 days (interquartile range, 6-13 d) for traumatic brain injury and 7 days (interquartile range, 3-12 d) for nontraumatic brain injury patients. Nontraumatic brain injury patients with tracheostomy prior to 7 days had 5.6 fewer ICU days (-7.8 to -3.5 d) and 5.7 fewer hospital days (-8.8 to -2.7 d) than patients intubated greater than or equal to 7 days and had 14.8 fewer ICU days (-19.6 to -10.0 d) and 15.3 fewer hospital days (-21.7 to -8.9 d) than patients with tracheostomy greater than or equal to 7 days. Similar differences were observed at 14 days but not at 3 days for both traumatic brain injury and nontraumatic brain injury patients. At the 3- and 7-day cut points, both traumatic brain injury and nontraumatic brain injury patients with tracheostomy prior to the cut point had lower risk of pneumonia and risk of discharge to a facility than those with tracheostomy after the cut point.

Conclusions

For injured adolescents, tracheostomy less than 7 days after admission was associated with improved in-hospital outcomes compared with those who remained intubated greater than or equal to 7 days and with those with tracheostomy greater than or equal to 7 days. Tracheostomy between 3 and 7 days may be the optimal time point when prolonged need for mechanical ventilation is anticipated; however, unmeasured consequences of tracheostomy such as long-term complications and care needs must also be considered.

SUBMITTER: Butler EK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8259766 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure.Summary background dataTracheostomy has an essential role in managing COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, limited data are available on how tracheostomy affects COVID-19 outcomes, and uncertainty surrounding risk of infectious transmission has led to divergent recommendations and practices.MethodsIt is a multicenter, retrospective study; data were collected on all tracheostomies performed in COVID-19 patients at 7 hospitals in 5 tertiary academic medical systems from February 1, 2020 to September 4, 2020.ResultTracheotomy was performed in 118 patients with median time from intubation to tracheostomy of 22 days (Q1-Q3: 18-25). All tracheostomies were performed employing measures to minimize aerosol generation, 78.0% by percutaneous technique, and 95.8% at bedside in negative pressure rooms. Seventy-eight (66.1%) patients were weaned from the ventilator and 18 (15.3%) patients died from causes unrelated to tracheostomy. No major procedural complications occurred. Early tracheostomy (≤14 days) was associated with decreased ventilator days; median ventilator days (Q1-Q3) among patients weaned from the ventilator in the early, middle and late groups were 21 (21-31), 34 (26.5-42), and 37 (32-41) days, respectively with P = 0.030. Compared to surgical tracheostomy, percutaneous technique was associated with faster weaning for patients weaned off the ventilator [median (Q1-Q3): 34 (29-39) vs 39 (34-51) days, P = 0.038]; decreased ventilator-associated pneumonia (58.7% vs 80.8%, P = 0.039); and among patients who were discharged, shorter intensive care unit duration [median (Q1-Q3): 33 (27-42) vs 47 (33-64) days, P = 0.009]; and shorter hospital length of stay [median (Q1-Q3): 46 (33-59) vs 59.5 (48-80) days, P = 0.001].ConclusionEarly, percutaneous tracheostomy was associated with improved outcomes compared to surgical tracheostomy in a multi-institutional series of ventilated patients with COVID-19.