Elagolix in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common benign tumor arising from myometrium of reproductive age women, with significant financial burden estimated in hundreds of billions of dollars. Unfortunately, there are limitations in available long-term treatment options. Thus, there is a large unmet need in the UF space for noninvasive therapeutics.Areas covered
Authors reviewed the literature available for elagolix; an orally bioavailable, second-generation, non-peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with UFs in premenopausal women.Expert opinion
The utility of new-generation oral GnRH-antagonists, such as elagolix, relugolix and linzagolix, is offering a new potential opportunity for the future therapy of UFs: elagolix has been the most studied drug of this class for treating benign gynecological diseases, including endometriosis and UFs, for which it has been US FDA-approved in 2018 and 2020, respectively.
SUBMITTER: Ali M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8262561 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Elagolix in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women.
Ali Mohamed M A R Sara S Al Hendy Ayman A
Expert review of clinical pharmacology 20210315 4
<h4>Introduction</h4>Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common benign tumor arising from myometrium of reproductive age women, with significant financial burden estimated in hundreds of billions of dollars. Unfortunately, there are limitations in available long-term treatment options. Thus, there is a large unmet need in the UF space for noninvasive therapeutics.<h4>Areas covered</h4>Authors reviewed the literature available for elagolix; an orally bioavailable, second-generation, non-peptide g ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundUterine fibroids are one of the most common neoplasms found among women globally, with a prevalence of approximately 11 million women in the United States alone. The morbidity of this common disease is significant because it is the leading cause of hysterectomy and causes significant functional impairment for women of reproductive age. Factors including age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, menstrual blood loss, fibroid location, and uterine and fibroid volume influence the incidence of fibroids and severity of symptoms. Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist that competitively inhibits pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor activity and suppresses the release of gonadotropins from the pituitary gland, resulting in dose-dependent suppression of ovarian sex hormones, follicular growth, and ovulation. In Elaris Uterine Fibroids 1 and Uterine Fibroids 2, 2 replicate multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies, treatment of premenopausal women with elagolix with hormonal add-back therapy demonstrated reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids.ObjectiveThis analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of elagolix (300 mg twice a day) with add-back therapy (1 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethindrone acetate once a day) in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in various subgroups of women over 6 months of treatment.Study designData were pooled from Elaris Uterine Fibroid-1 and Uterine Fibroid-2 studies, which evaluated premenopausal women (18-51 years) with heavy menstrual bleeding (>80 mL menstrual blood loss per cycle, alkaline hematin methodology) and ultrasound-confirmed uterine fibroid diagnosis. Subgroups analyzed included age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, baseline menstrual blood loss, fibroid location, and uterine and primary fibroid volume (largest fibroid identified by ultrasound). The primary endpoint was the proportion of women with <80 mL menstrual blood loss during the final month and ≥50% menstrual blood loss reduction from baseline to final month. Secondary and other efficacy endpoints included mean change in menstrual blood loss from baseline to final month, amenorrhea, symptom severity, and health-related quality of life. Adverse events and other safety endpoints were monitored.ResultsThe overall pooled Elaris Uterine Fibroid-1 and Uterine Fibroid-2 population was typical of women with fibroids, with a mean age of 42.4 (standard deviation, 5.4) years and a mean body mass index of 33.6 (standard deviation, 7.3) kg/m2 and 67.6% of participants being black or African American women. A wide range of baseline uterine and fibroid volumes and menstrual blood loss were also represented in the overall pooled study population. In all subgroups, the proportion of responders to the primary endpoint, mean change in menstrual blood loss, amenorrhea, reduction in symptom severity, and improvement in health-related quality of life were clinically meaningfully greater for women who received elagolix with add-back therapy than those who received placebo and consistent with the overall pooled study population for the primary endpoint (72.2% vs 9.3%), mean change in menstrual blood loss (-172.5 mL vs -0.8 mL), amenorrhea (50.4% vs 4.5%), symptom severity (-37.1 vs -9.2), and health-related quality of life score (39.9 vs 8.9). Adverse events by subgroup were consistent with the overall pooled study population.ConclusionElagolix with hormonal add-back therapy was effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids independent of age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, baseline menstrual blood loss, fibroid location, and uterine and primary fibroid volume.
| S-EPMC8800453 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionUterine Fibroids (UFs) are the most predominant benign tumor in women who are coming of reproductive age, and causes intense economic load priced in billions of US dollars. Historically, surgery has been the main definitive treatment, albeit less attractive nowadays, especially for women with future fertility plans. Therefore, studies to explore the pharmacological treatment options are increasing especially as those that are currently available are limited for short-term use only.Areas coveredThis drug evaluation features the clinical results from previous and ongoing studies of relugolix, in combination with the add back therapy of estradiol (E2) and norethindrone acetate (NETA), as a novel, orally administered, nonpeptide antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in premenopausal women with UFs.Expert opinionThe combination of relugolix/E2/NETA is an encouraging, well-tolerated and noninvasive pharmacological option for UFs patients. Relugolix induced a concentration-dependent decrease in HMB. However, it should be used with hormonal add-back therapy (E2+ NETA) to avoid induced hypoestrogenic side effects, importantly bone mineral density loss. Moreover, symptoms will likely resume shortly after the termination of the relugolix combination administration.
| S-EPMC8866208 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundElagolix is effective and safe for treating menorrhagia in women with uterine fibroid. However, it is reported to be associated with hypoestrogenism that can be alleviated by adding estradiol/norethindrone acetate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid by comparing: elagolix versus placebo and elagolix versus estradiol/norethindrone acetate.MethodologyThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2021, Issue 3 of 12), MEDLINE databases (1980 to December week 1, 2020), and trial registries for relevant randomized clinical trials were used. All randomized clinical trials were reviewed and evaluated. Random effects models were used to estimate the dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Data for risk of bias, heterogeneity, sensitivity, reporting bias and quality of evidence were assessed.ResultsFour randomized controlled trials with 1949 premenopausal women from 323 locations were included. Elagolix improved menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml (RR 4.81, 95% CI 2.45 to 9.45; four trials, 869 participants; moderate quality evidence) or more than 50% reduction from baseline (RR 4.87, 95% CI 2.55 to 9.31; four trials, 869 participants; moderate quality evidence) compared to placebo. There was no difference in menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.16; five trials, 1365 participants; moderate quality evidence) or more than 50% reduction from baseline between the elagolix (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15; five trials, 1365 participants; high quality evidence) and elagolix with estradiol/norethindrone acetate. In both comparisons, elagolix has reduced the mean percentage change in uterine and fibroid volume, improved symptoms, and health-related quality of life. More patients had hot flush, and bone mineral density loss in the elagolix treatment compared to both placebo and elagolix with estradiol/norethindrone acetate.ConclusionsElagolix appeared to be effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding caused by uterine fibroid and combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate was able to alleviate the hypoestrogenism side effects in premenopausal women. Review registration PROSPERO CDR 42021233898.
| S-EPMC8761302 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objective: To assess outcomes of women with uterine fibroids (UFs) and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) treated with 300 mg elagolix twice daily plus add-back therapy (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg once daily) or placebo who were not considered responders in pooled analysis of two phase 3, 6-month randomized clinical trials (Elaris UF-1 and UF-2). Methods: Responders were defined as women who met both primary end point bleeding criteria (<80 mL menstrual blood loss [MBL] during the final month and ≥50% reduction in MBL from baseline to the final month) and either completed the study or discontinued due to predefined reasons. Thus, women termed nonresponders who were analyzed in this study who met neither or one bleeding end point or met both criteria but prematurely discontinued treatment because of adverse events, perceived lack of efficacy, or required surgical or interventional treatment for UFs were analyzed in this study. This post hoc analysis assessed mean changes from baseline in MBL, as well as adverse events. Results: Among 367 women receiving elagolix with add-back with observed data, 89 (24%) were not considered responders. Within this subset, 17 (19%) women met both bleeding criteria but prematurely discontinued treatment for the reasons mentioned above, while 23 (26%) met one bleeding criterion and 49 (55%) met neither bleeding criteria, regardless of discontinuation status. Among all nonresponders, a numerical trend toward greater mean reductions in MBL was observed in those receiving elagolix with add-back, compared with placebo group nonresponders. No differences in adverse events were observed between responders and nonresponders. Conclusion: Forty of 89 (45%) women with HMB and UFs who were classified as nonresponders in the UF-1 or UF-2 trials may have had a clinically meaningful response to elagolix with add-back therapy because they met at least one of the objective bleeding criteria. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02654054 and NCT02691494. (NEJM 2020; 382:328-340) DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904351.
| S-EPMC9133968 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with hormonal add-back therapy for up to 12 months in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas.MethodsElaris UF-EXTEND was a phase 3 extension study that evaluated an additional 6 months (up to 12 months total) of elagolix 300 mg twice daily with hormonal add-back therapy (estradiol 1 mg and norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg once daily) in women who completed an initial 6 months of the same treatment in one of two preceding phase 3 studies. The primary endpoint was the percentage of women with both less than 80 mL menstrual blood loss during final month and a 50% or greater reduction in menstrual blood loss from baseline to final month. Safety evaluations included adverse events and bone mineral density changes. The planned sample size of UF-EXTEND was based on estimated rollover and discontinuation rates in the two preceding studies.ResultsFrom September 2016 to March 2019, 433 women were enrolled in UF-EXTEND. Of these women, 218 received up to 12 months of elagolix with add-back therapy; the mean±SD age of this group was 42.4±5.4 years and 67.3% were black. The percentage of women who met the primary endpoint in this elagolix with add-back group was 87.9% (95% CI [83.4-92.3]). The most frequently reported adverse events with up to 12 months of elagolix plus add-back therapy were hot flush (6.9%), night sweats (3.2%), headache (5.5%), and nausea (4.1%). Mean percent decreases in bone mineral density from baseline to extension month 6 were significantly less with elagolix plus add-back therapy than with elagolix alone {between-group difference in lumbar spine: -3.3 (95% CI [-4.1 to -2.5])}.ConclusionUp to 12 months of elagolix with add-back therapy provided sustained reduction in menstrual blood loss in women with uterine leiomyomas, with the addition of add-back therapy attenuating the hypoestrogenic effects of elagolix alone. No new or unexpected safety concerns were associated with an additional 6 months of elagolix with addback therapy.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02925494.Funding sourceAbbVie Inc funded this study.
| S-EPMC7253187 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is one of the most common distressing complications of uterine fibroids (UF); however, data on the health care costs for treatments in women experiencing HMB associated with UF are lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the direct costs and treatments patterns for women diagnosed with UF+HMB, UF only, and HMB only in the United States. Materials and Methods: The study design was retrospective matched cohort study using claims data. Women, aged 18-51 years, comprising four cohorts (HMB only, UF only, UF+HMB, and controls) were identified in the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (October 1, 2007‒September 30, 2018) and matched by demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Baseline characteristics and treatments during the 12 months post-diagnosis were summarized descriptively. Costs (2018 U.S. dollars) during the post-diagnosis year were compared using analysis of variance. Results: Before matching, women with UF+HMB represented 54% of UF cases. Following diagnosis, 32% in the matched UF+HMB cohort had no treatment, 49% underwent surgeries/procedures with (12%) or without (37%) medications, and 18% received medications only. The mean all-cause total costs for UF+HMB ($16,762) exceeded that for UF only by 24% ($13,506) and HMB only by 50% ($11,135), and almost tripled the mean cost for the control cohort ($6,691) (all, p < 0.001). The mean diagnosis-related costs were significantly higher for UF+HMB ($8,741) than for UF only ($4,550) and HMB only ($3,081) (all, p < 0.0001). Surgery/procedure costs comprised 80% of diagnosis-related medical costs for UF+HMB. Conclusions: UF with HMB were associated with significant economic burden, driven primarily by surgical/procedural costs and treatment patterns.
| S-EPMC9245789 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, alone or with add-back therapy, in premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding (greater than 80 mL per month) associated with uterine leiomyomas.MethodsThis double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated efficacy and safety of elagolix in cohorts 1 (300 mg twice daily) and 2 (600 mg daily) with four arms per cohort: placebo, elagolix alone, elagolix with 0.5 mg estradiol/0.1 norethindrone acetate, and elagolix with 1.0 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethindrone acetate. A sample size of 65 per group was planned to compare elagolix with add-back to placebo on the primary end point: the percentage of women who had less than 80 mL menstrual blood loss and 50% or greater reduction in menstrual blood loss from baseline to the last 28 days of treatment. Safety assessments included changes in bone mineral density.ResultsFrom April 8, 2013, to December 8, 2015, 571 women were enrolled, 567 were randomized and treated (cohort 1=259; cohort 2=308), and 80% and 75% completed treatment, respectively. Participants had a mean±SD age of 43±5 years (cohort 2, 42±5 years), and 70% were black (cohort 2, 74%). Primary end point responder rates in cohort 1 (cohort 2) were 92% (90%) for elagolix alone, 85% (73%) for elagolix with 0.5 mg estradiol/0.1 mg norethindrone acetate, 79% (82%) for elagolix with 1.0 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethindrone acetate, and 27% (32%) for placebo (all P<.001 vs placebo). Elagolix groups had significant decreases compared with placebo in lumbar spine bone mineral density, which was attenuated by adding 1.0 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethindrone acetate.ConclusionElagolix with and without add-back significantly reduced menstrual blood loss in women with uterine leiomyomas. Add-back therapy reduced hypoestrogenic effects on bone mineral density.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01817530; EU Clinical Trial Register, 2013-000082-37.
| S-EPMC7963450 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHistorically, the clinical characteristics and treatment pathways for patients with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding have differed between White and Black women.ObjectiveTo provide a contemporary comparison of patient characteristics and treatment patterns among White and Black women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding in the United States.Study designThis retrospective cohort study included administrative claims data from 46,139 White and 17,297 Black women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding from the Optum Clinformatics database (January 2011-December 2020) and 7353 White and 16,776 Black women from the IBM MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Insurance database (January 2010-December 2019). Patients were indexed at their initial uterine fibroid diagnosis claim and were required to have a claim for heavy menstrual bleeding and ≥12 months of continuous enrollment pre- and postindex. Patients were followed until the earliest of death, disenrollment, hysterectomy date, or end of study database. Outcomes were stratified by race and included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, pharmacologic treatment patterns, and surgeries/procedures. Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous data were used to evaluate differences in baseline characteristics. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize treatment pathways for hormonal contraceptive use in women with ≥24 months of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate time until hysterectomy, with log-rank testing to assess between-group differences.ResultsThe mean (standard deviation) duration of follow-up was 44.6 (27.9) and 41.0 (24.9) months in the commercial and Medicaid databases, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) age at uterine fibroid diagnosis was lower for Black than White women in both databases (commercial: 42.3 [6.5] vs 44.4 [6.3] years; P<.0001; Medicaid: 39.6 [7.1] years vs 40.2 [7.2] years; P<.0001). Anemia was more prevalent in Black vs White women in both databases (commercial: 5.9% [1028/17,297] vs 3.6% [1648/46,139]; P<.0001; Medicaid: 7.0% [1180/16,776] vs 4.5% [331/7353]; P<.0001). In the commercial database, approximately one-half of women had claims for ≥1 bulk symptom, with no significant differences between groups. In the Medicaid database, significantly more White than Black women had claims for bulk symptoms (77.0% [5665/7353] vs 68.4% [11,477/16,776]; P<.0001). Approximately 40% of all patients received hormonal drug therapies as initial treatment, most commonly hormonal contraceptives. However, discontinuation of hormonal contraceptive therapy was nearly universal, with one-half discontinuing within a median treatment duration of ∼5 months. Most women stopped treatment after 1 or 2 agents (commercial: White, 89.9% [9757/10,857]; Black, 90.0% [3594/3993]; Medicaid: White, 92.2% [1635/1773]; Black, 94.2% [4454/4726]). Hysterectomy was the most common procedure, and was more common among White vs Black women (commercial: 43.9% [20,235/46,139] vs 37.8% [6536/17,297]; Medicaid: 46.8% [3444/7353] vs 32.0% [5364/16,776]).ConclusionsBlack women with UF-HMB were diagnosed at a younger age than White women, and White women had higher hysterectomy rates than Black women, representing a shift from earlier researched treatment patterns. Patients with UF-HMB were also highly reliant on hormonal contraceptives, followed by nearly universal therapeutic discontinuation.
| S-EPMC11570315 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6870550 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo report patterns and patient characteristics associated with initiation of and persistence with medical therapies for uterine fibroid-related heavy menstrual bleeding.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingUS commercial insurance claims database.Population41 561 women aged 18-54 years with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding who initiated medical therapies from January 2000 through December 2013.MethodMultinomial logistic regression was used to assess patient characteristics associated with initiation and persistence. Cox proportional hazards regression was used on propensity score-matched cohorts to examine change from index medication.Main outcomes measuresInitiation of and persistence with four first-line medical therapies: short- and long-acting reversible contraceptive steroids, leuprolide acetate, and tranexamic acid.ResultsMost women (79.4%) took short-acting reversible contraceptive steroids as first-line therapy (index medication), whereas 9.5%, 8.5%, and 2.7% used long-acting reversible contraceptive steroids, leuprolide acetate, and tranexamic acid, respectively. During follow-up, 16 594 women (39.9%) switched to nonindex medication (18.4%) or procedural treatment (81.6%). In comparison with women taking short-acting steroids, those receiving long-acting steroids were less likely to switch [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.91], whereas women taking leuprolide acetate (HR 2.44, 95% CI 2.27-2.62) or tranexamic acid (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.65) were more likely to switch. Older age, emergency department visits, anaemia, and inflammatory disease diagnoses at baseline were associated with increased probability of discontinuing the index medication or switching to another therapy.ConclusionsWomen with uterine fibroid-related heavy menstrual bleeding were more likely to persist with their initial therapy of long-acting reversible contraceptive steroid compared with other medical options.Tweetable abstract80% women with fibroid-related heavy menstrual bleeding use SARC, but LARC users are more persistent.
| S-EPMC5736004 | biostudies-literature