Dataset Information

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Yields Favorable Neurological Outcomes in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

ABSTRACT:

Background and objectives

Prior studies have shown that stroke patients treated with percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) experience better outcomes than similar patients treated with warfarin. We investigated the impact of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure on post-stroke neurological outcomes in NVAF patients, compared with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy.

Methods

Medical records for 1,427 patients in multiple registries and for 1,792 consecutive patients at 6 Korean hospitals were reviewed with respect to LAAO or NOAC treatment. Stroke severity in patients who experienced ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack after either treatment was assessed with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scoring at hospital discharge and at 3 and 12 months post-stroke.

Results

mRS scores were significantly lower in LAAO patients at 3 (p<0.01) and 12 months (p<0.01) post-stroke, despite no significant differences in scores before the ischemic cerebrovascular event (p=0.22). The occurrences of disabling ischemic stroke in the LAAO and NOAC groups were 36.7% and 44.2% at discharge (p=0.47), 23.3% and 44.2% at 3 months post-stroke (p=0.04), and 13.3% and 43.0% at 12 months post-stroke (p=0.01), respectively. Recovery rates for disabling ischemic stroke at discharge to 12 months post-stroke were significantly higher for LAAO patients (50.0%) than for NOAC patients (5.6%) (p<0.01).

Conclusions

Percutaneous LAAO was associated with more favorable neurological outcomes after ischemic cerebrovascular event than NOAC treatment.

SUBMITTER: Lee OH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8263298 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant cause of perioperative stroke in aortic and mitral valve surgeries. Although several large studies have evaluated surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (SLAAO) during cardiac surgeries, their retrospective nature and an uncontrolled broad spectrum of conditions leave them subject to potential residual confounding. This trial aims to test the hypothesis that opportunistic SLAAO can prevent long-term stroke after cardiac surgery in patients receiving mitral or aortic valve surgeries without a history of AF and with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or higher.Methods and designThis study is a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. A total of 2118 patients planning to undergo aortic or mitral surgery without AF will be recruited and equally randomised into intervention or control arms at a 1:1 ratio. In the intervention arm, suture excision of the left atrial appendage (LAA) will be performed during the operation in addition to the original surgery plan. In the control arm, the operation will be performed according to the surgery plan without any intervention on the LAA. The primary outcome is a composite of newly occurred ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and cardiovascular mortality during a 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes include postoperative AF, cardiovascular mortality, newly occurred ischaemic stroke, newly occurred transient ischaemic attack, newly occurred haemorrhagic stroke, bleeding events, and AF-associated health utilisation.Ethics and disseminationThe Ethics Committee in Fuwai Hospital approved this study. Patients will give informed consent to the study. An information leaflet will be provided to participating patients to introduce the SLAAO procedure. Patients and the public will not get involved in developing the research hypothesis, study design or any other part of this protocol. We plan to publish several papers in peer-reviewed journals about the current research and these will include a description of the study's development and the main findings of the study.Trial registration numberChiCTR2100042238.