Dataset Information

Electrophysiological predictors and indicators of contingency management treatment response: Rationale and design for the ways of rewarding abstinence project (WRAP).

ABSTRACT:

Background

Electrophysiological measures can predict and reflect substance use treatment response. Veterans are disproportionately affected by disorders of addiction; cocaine use disorder (CUD) being particularly problematic due to high relapse rates and the absence of approved pharmacotherapies. Prize-based Contingency Management (PBCM) is an evidence-based behavioral intervention for CUD, involving incentives for cocaine abstinence but treatment response is variable. Measurement-based adaptation of PBCM has promise to improve effectiveness but remains to be usefully developed.

Methods

This trial aims to determine if individuals with distinct neurocognitive profiles differentially benefit from one of two existing versions of PBCM. CUD patients will be randomized into treatment-as-usual or 12-weeks of PBCM using either monetary or tangible prize incentives. Prior to randomization, EEG will be used to assess response to monetary versus tangible reward; EEG and cognitive-behavioral measures of working memory, cognitive control, and episodic future thinking will also be acquired. Substance use and treatment engagement will be monitored throughout the treatment interval and assessments will be repeated at post-treatment.

Discussion

Results of this trial may elucidate individual differences contributing to PBCM treatment response and reveal predictors of differential benefits from existing treatment variants. The design also affords the opportunity to evaluate treatment-related changes in neurocognitive functioning over the course of PBCM. Our model posits that PBCM scaffolds future-oriented goal representation and self-control to support abstinence. Individuals with poorer functioning may be less responsive to abstract monetary reward and will therefore achieve better outcomes with respect to abstinence and treatment engagement when tangible incentives are utilized.

SUBMITTER: Forster SE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8264114 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate a pilot preoperative contingency management (CM) intervention for smoking abstinence.Aims and methodsThis multisite pilot study was conducted at two cancer center-based tobacco treatment programs. Participants who were smoking, diagnosed with or suspected to have any type of operable cancer, and had a surgical procedure scheduled in the next 10 days to 5 weeks (N = 40) were randomized to receive standard care plus monitoring only (MO) or CM prior to surgery. All patients received breath carbon monoxide (CO) tests 3 times per week, nicotine patches, and counseling. The CM group also earned payments for self-reported smoking abstinence confirmed by CO breath test ≤6 ppm on an escalating schedule of reinforcement (with a reset if they smoked). Seven-day point prevalence abstinence rates on the day of surgery and at 3-month follow-up were compared between groups using repeated measures log-linear regression models utilizing generalized estimating equations. Participants lost to follow-up are assumed to have returned to smoking.ResultsThe sample was 50% female and 75% White. In covariate adjusted models, patients in the CM group had a greater probability of reported abstinence. On the day of surgery (end of treatment), 52% of CM patients were abstinent compared with 16% of patients in MO (risk ratio = 3.2 [1.1-9.3]; p = .03). At the 3-month follow-up, 43% of CM patients were abstinent compared with 5% in MO (risk ratio = 8.4 [1.5-48.3]; p = .02).ConclusionsProviding monetary incentives contingent on abstinence prior to cancer surgery may produce significant improvements in smoking abstinence rates relative to breath CO MO.ImplicationsIn this pilot preoperative CM intervention for smoking abstinence, patients receiving a CM intervention prior to cancer surgery had a greater probability of smoking abstinence at the end of treatment compared with a breath MO group (52% vs. 16%, respectively). Thus, providing monetary incentives contingent on abstinence may produce significant improvements in smoking abstinence rates prior to cancer surgery relative to breath CO monitoring.

Project description:Although contingency management (CM) is effective in promoting abstinence and treatment retention among crack cocaine users who meet the criteria for cocaine dependence, less is known about its off-target effects. In this secondary analysis, we evaluated the impact of CM on depressive and anxiety symptoms in a sample of cocaine-dependent individuals under treatment. Sixty-five crack cocaine users who met the criteria for cocaine dependence were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of standard treatment alone (STA; n = 32) or 12 weeks of standard treatment plus CM (STCM; n = 33). The outcome measures of the secondary analysis were depressive and anxiety symptoms assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). At baseline, 59 (90.8%) of the participants reported at least mild depressive symptoms and 47 (72.5%) reported at least mild anxiety symptoms. The mean BDI-II (24.5 ± 12.1) and BAI (20.7 ± 13.5) scores in the sample as a whole was moderate. After treatment, the reported levels of depressive symptoms (β = -9.6, p < .05) and anxiety symptoms (β = -9.9, p < .05) were lower among the individuals receiving STCM than among those receiving STA. This study provides evidence that an STCM intervention targeting crack cocaine abstinence also produces significant reductions in depressive and anxiety symptoms. This low cost intervention also demonstrated significant promise and optimization potential for crack cocaine users in a setting of scarce resources and high mental health comorbidity. Relevance Statement: We found that the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms were extremely high among crack cocaine users, and that, among such individuals, contingency management (CM) reduced depressive and anxiety symptomatology to a greater degree than did standard treatment. Our results suggest that CM targeting crack cocaine abuse can have off-target effects on psychiatric symptomatology. (PsycINFO Database Record

Project description:IntroductionContinued smoking following a cancer diagnosis has substantial health risks including increased overall and cancer-specific mortality, risk of secondary malignancies, cancer treatment toxicity and risk of surgical complications. These risks can be mitigated by quitting smoking. The preoperative period represents a prime opportunity in which to administer robust smoking cessation treatment to both improve health and support and improve surgical outcomes. We will conduct a randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of financial incentives delivered contingent on biochemically verified smoking abstinence (contingency management (CM)) in patients with cancer undergoing surgery.Methods and analysisThe study will take place across two study sites, and participants (N=282) who smoke, are diagnosed with or suspected to have any type of operable cancer and have a surgical procedure scheduled in the next 10 days to 5 weeks will be randomised to receive standard care plus Monitoring Only or CM prior to surgery. All patients will receive breath carbon monoxide (CO) tests three times per week, nicotine replacement therapy and counselling. The CM group will also earn payments for self-reported smoking abstinence confirmed by CO breath test ≤4 ppm on an escalating schedule of reinforcement (with a reset if they smoked). Point prevalence abstinence (PPA) outcomes (self-report of 7-day abstinence confirmed by CO≤4 ppm and/or anabasine ≤2 ng/mL) will be assessed on the day of surgery and 6 months after surgery. The effect of CM on 7-day PPA at the time of surgery and 6-month follow-up will be modelled using generalised linear mixed effects models.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been reviewed and approved by the Medical University of South Carolina Institutional Review Board. We will disseminate our scientific results through traditional research-oriented outlets such as presentations at scientific meetings and publications in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT04605458.

Project description:AimsTo test if contingency management (CM) interventions for alcohol and drug abstinence were associated with increased alcohol and drug abstinence among American Indian adults with alcohol dependence who also use drugs.DesignIn this 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial, American Indian adults with alcohol dependence who also used drugs were randomized to four conditions: (1) incentives for submission of urine samples only (control condition), (2) CM incentives for alcohol abstinence, (3) CM incentives for drug abstinence or (4) CM incentives for abstinence from both alcohol and drugs.SettingA Northern Plains Reservation in the United States.ParticipantsA total of 114 American Indian adults aged 35.8 years (standard deviation = 10.4); 49.1% were male.Intervention and comparatorParticipants received incentives if they demonstrated abstinence from alcohol (CM for alcohol, n = 30), abstinence from their most frequently used drug (CM for drugs, n = 27) or abstinence from both alcohol and their most frequently used drug (CM for alcohol and drugs, n = 32) as assessed by urine tests. Controls (n = 25) received incentives for submitting urine samples only.MeasurementsPrimary outcomes were urine ethyl glucuronide (alcohol) and drug tests conducted three times per week during the 12-week intervention period. Data analyses included listwise deletion and multiple imputation to account for missing data.FindingsThe three CM groups were significantly (P < 0.05) more likely to submit alcohol-abstinent urine samples compared with the control condition, with odds ratios ranging from 2.4 to 4.8. The CM for drugs (OR = 3.2) and CM for alcohol and drugs (OR = 2.5) were significantly more likely to submit urine samples that indicated drug abstinence, relative to the control condition (P < 0.05). However, these differences were not significant in multiple imputation analyses (P > 0.05).ConclusionsContingency management (CM) incentives for abstinence were associated with increased alcohol abstinence in American Indian adults diagnosed with alcohol dependence who also used drugs, living on a rural reservation. The effect of CM incentives on drug abstinence was inconclusive.

Project description:AimsMethamphetamine Use Disorder is prevalent in South Africa. This analysis uses data from a contingency management (CM) pilot study in South Africa to replicate and expand on a U.S.-based study showing that CM voucher spending was associated with drug abstinence behavior.DesignParticipants with methamphetamine-use disorder were enrolled in an 8-week CM trial requiring thrice weekly visits and received cash vouchers in exchange for stimulant-negative urines at each visit.ParticipantsParticipants were 33 treatment-seeking individuals with methamphetamine use disorder including 22 men (66.7%) and 11 women (33.3%) with a mean age of 34 years (S.D. = 7.7). Participants reported using methamphetamine for a mean of 11.7 years (S.D. = 4.9).SettingAll study procedures took place in South Africa between August 2016 and May 2018.MeasurementsA time-lagged counting process Cox Proportional Hazards model for recurrent event survival analysis examined the relationship between frequency of and participant-categorized type of CM expenditures (hedonic, utilitarian, consumable or durable) and drug abstinence.FindingsAfter controlling for severity of baseline methamphetamine use and accumulated CM earnings (proxied by cumulative negative urines), those spending CM earnings at a previous visit ("spenders") were more likely to produce stimulant-negative urine samples subsequently, compared to those who did not ("savers") [OR = 1.23, CI = 1.08-1.53, p = .002]. There were significantly more cumulative stimulant-negative results among spenders vs. savers, p < .001, although cumulative spending did not significantly predict abstinence once spending in the prior time period was controlled for, suggesting a recency effect tied to the underlying spending mechanism. When extending the original analyses to look at the effect of spending on current abstinence, controlling only for recent abstinence (rather than cumulative abstinence), spending was no longer a significant predictor. Spending type did not affect methamphetamine abstinence. Qualitative results suggest spending CM vouchers may support social reintegration over the course of the trial.ConclusionsAbstinence outcomes are a function of CM spending in both the U.S. and South Africa. Findings of a significant relationship between contingency management spending and subsequent stimulant-negative urine samples across geographic locations provide guidance toward future work in optimizing CM efficacy.