Dataset Information

Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies Liver Metastases as Negative Predictive Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment Outcome.

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of liver metastases (LM) in patients with various advanced cancers received immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). First, clinical and survival data from a published cohort of 1,661 patients who received ICIs therapy were downloaded and analyzed. Second, a retrospective review of 182 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was identified. Third, a meta-analysis of published trials was performed to explore the impact of LM on the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based therapy in advanced lung cancers. Pan-cancer analysis revealed that patients with LM had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those without LM (10 vs. 20 months; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that the presence of LM was associated with markedly shorter OS than those without LM in ICI monotherapy group (P < 0.0001), but it did not reach the statistical significance in ICI-based combination therapy (P = 0.0815). In NSCLC, the presence of LM was associated with significantly inferior treatment outcomes in both pan-cancer and real-world cohort. Interestingly, ICI-based monotherapy and combination therapy could simultaneously prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and OS than chemotherapy in patients without LM. However, ICI-based monotherapy could not prolong PFS than chemotherapy in patients with LM while ICI-based combination therapy could dramatically prolong both PFS and OS. Together, these findings suggested that the presence of LM was the negative predictive factor in cancer patients received ICIs monotherapy, especially in NSCLC. ICI-based combination therapy might overcome the intrinsic resistance of LM to ICIs while the optimal combinatorial strategies remain under further investigation.

SUBMITTER: Chen XJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8264582 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy elicits admirable anti-tumor responses across many types of cancer. Growing evidence point to a link to Mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) and DNA damage repair (DDR) and TGF-β signing, while the clinical data on the association of MED12 and ICIs response are lacking. In this study, clinical and whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from published studies were merged as a WES cohort to explore the association between MED12 mutation (MED12-Mut) and ICIs efficiency across cancers. Then, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) cohort was used for validating our findings. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort was used to perform anti-tumor immunity and prognosis analysis. In the WES cohort (n = 474), significant differences were detected between MED12-Mut and MED12-wildtype (MED12-Wt) patients regarding durable clinical benefit (DCB, 80.00% vs. 53.67%, P = 0.022). In addition, significantly prolonged PFS was observed in MED12-Mut patients (mPFS: not reached, NR vs. 5.87 months, HR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.85, log-rank P = 0.015), After taking into account age, gender, metastasis, treatment and TMB status, the result of multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression showed significantly better PFS (HR:0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.92; P = 0.031). In the MSKCC cohort (n = 1513), overall survival advantage was achieved in MED12-Mut patients (mOS: 41 vs. 19 months, HR:0.54, 95%CI 0.34-0.85; log-rank P = 0.007), after taking into account same factors in WES cohort, this link still existed (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.96, P = 0.033), Notably, TMB was also found significantly higher in MED12-Mut patients in both WES and MSKCC cohort. Further tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and DDR-related gene analysis revealed anti-tumor immunity in MED12-Mut patients. Totally, MED12-Mut successfully predicted better clinical outcomes in ICIs-treated pan-cancer cohort, indicating that MED12-Mut could serve as a potential predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors in pan-cancer.

Project description:Background: Nuclear factor interleukin 3 (NFIL3) mainly focuses on the regulation of the circadian rhythm and immune system. However, the potential role of NFIL3 in human cancers has not been studied extensively. Methods: We retrieved original data from the TCGA, TARGET, and GTEx datasets via the UCSC Xena browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/) and integrated them using R version 3.6.4. NFIL3 expression was assessed using resources such as UCSC, GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/), Kaplan-Meier Plotter (KM Plotter; https://kmplot.com/), and the Human Protein Atlas (HPA; https://www.proteinatlas.org/) databases. To investigate the prognostic implications of NFIL3, we utilized GEPIA, Kaplan-Meier Plotter, and PrognoScan (http://www.abren.net/PrognoScan/) datasets. For a comprehensive analysis across multiple cancer types, we employed pan-cancer data from UCSC, examining associations between NFIL3 expression and genomic heterogeneity, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor purity, and neoantigens. Furthermore, we explored the relationships between NFIL3 expression and the infiltration of immune cells and the expression of immune checkpoint genes. In the context of ovarian cancer, we validated the expression and functional relevance of NFIL3. Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK8) assays were conducted to assess cell proliferation, while scratch and transwell assays were employed to evaluate cell migration capabilities. We further examined the interaction between NFIL3 and the p53 signaling pathway through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), Western blot analysis, immunofluorescence confocal, and Coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays. Results: In general, NFIL3 expression in cancerous tissues exhibited diminished levels when compared to normal tissue samples. Notably, NFIL3 expression demonstrated a robust correlation with several pivotal aspects, including prognosis, immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoint-related genes, TMB, MSI, tumor purity, and the presence of neoantigens. Experimental investigations involving scratch assays, transwell assays, and assessments of cell proliferation in ovarian cancer cells have provided indications that NFIL3 may exert influence over cell migration and proliferation processes. Moreover, a substantial association between NFIL3 and the p53 signaling pathway was discerned through Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, with subsequent validation through qRT-PCR, Western blot analysis, immunofluorescence confocal, and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays. Conclusions: Therefore, we concluded NFIL3 may serve as a possible prognostic and immunological pan-cancer biomarker.

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the setting of liver transplant (LT) pose a risk of rejection and hold unclear benefit in both the neoadjuvant (pre-transplant) and post-transplant salvage setting. In the pre-transplant setting, neoadjuvant ICIs may serve as a bridge to LT by downstaging disease burden to fit within transplant criteria. Outcomes in this setting include patients who had successful transplants without complications to patients who suffered severe complications, including fatal hepatic necrosis and graft failure requiring re-transplant. Some authors suggest having a period of three months between checkpoint inhibition and transplant may help mitigate adverse effects. In the post-LT setting, there are few treatment options if there is a recurrence of disease, which forces treatment teams to reconsider checkpoint inhibitors. Again, a longer period of time between transplant and checkpoint inhibition may reduce risk of rejection. Case reports of patients treated with ICIs post-transplant utilized either nivolumab or pembrolizumab. As combination atezolizumab/bevacizumab is a relatively new treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are only three reported cases using this combination in the post-LT setting. While there were no cases of rejection, all three cases had progression of disease. As immunotherapy joins transplantation as a mainstay of treatment for HCC, it remains unclear how to best navigate when the treatment course involves both immune activation and immunosuppression.Case descriptionPatients who had an LT and were treated with ICIs (pre or post LT) at the University of Cincinnati were included in this retrospective chart review.ConclusionsFatal rejection remains a significant risk even 4 years after LT. Neoadjuvant ICIs also pose a risk for acute cellular rejection; however, this may not always be clinically significant. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) may be an additional, previously unreported risk of ICIs in the setting of LT. Prospective studies are needed to understand benefits and risks of checkpoint inhibitors in the LT setting.

Dataset Information

Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies Liver Metastases as Negative Predictive Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment Outcome.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets