Dataset Information

Long-Term Real-World Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapies for Schizoaffective Disorder.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To investigate the long-term real-world effectiveness of antipsychotics and other psychopharmacotherapies in the treatment of schizoaffective disorder (SCHAFF).

Method

Two nationwide cohorts of SCHAFF patients were identified from Finnish and Swedish registers. Within-individual design was used with stratified Cox regression. The main exposure was use of antipsychotics. Adjunctive pharmacotherapies included mood stabilizers, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs. The main outcome was hospitalization due to psychosis.

Results

The Finnish cohort included 7655 and the Swedish cohort 7525 patients. Median follow-up time was 11.2 years (IQR 5.6-11.5) in the Finnish and 7.6 years (IQR 3.8-10.3) in the Swedish cohort. Clozapine and long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics were consistently associated with a decreased risk of psychosis hospitalization and treatment failure (psychiatric hospitalization, any change in medication, death) in both cohorts. Quetiapine was not associated with a decreased risk of psychosis hospitalization. Mood stabilizers used in combination with antipsychotics were associated with a decreased risk of psychosis hospitalization (Finnish cohort HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81; Swedish cohort HR 0.84, 0.78-0.90) when compared with antipsychotic monotherapy. Combination of antidepressants and antipsychotics was associated with a decreased risk of psychosis hospitalization in the Swedish cohort (HR 0.90, 0.83-0.97) but not in the Finnish cohort (1.00, 0.94-1.07), and benzodiazepine use was associated with an increased risk (Finnish cohort HR 1.07, 1.01-1.14; Swedish cohort 1.21, 1.13-1.30).

Conclusions

Clozapine, LAIs, and combination therapy with mood stabilizers were associated with the best outcome and use of quetiapine and benzodiazepines with the worst outcome in the treatment of SCHAFF.

SUBMITTER: Lintunen J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8266596 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCastleman disease (CD), classified as unicentric CD (UCD) or multicentric CD (MCD), is a rare non-neoplastic lymphoproliferative disorder of unknown origin. Owing to its rarity, the clinical characteristics, therapeutic modalities, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors related to UCD or MCD are not well defined.MethodWe retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with CD, including those with hyaline-vascular, plasma-cell, mixed type, hypervascular, and plasmablastic subtypes, for presenting symptoms, physical, laboratory, and radiologic findings, and treatment response in the Korean population.ResultsThe median patient age was 44 years (range: 18-84 years) with slight predominance of women (53.4%). UCD and MCD accounted for 38.6% (n=34) and 61.4% (n=54) of cases, respectively. Histopathologically, UCD patients were classified as 88.2% (n=30) hyaline-vascular and 11.8% (n=4) plasma cell types, whereas MCD patients were classified as 27.8% (n=15) hypervascular, 61.1% (n=33) plasma cell, 7.4% (n=4) mixed, and 3.7% (n=2) plasmablastic types. Twelve (13.6%) patients exhibited a poor performance status with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2. The most common presenting symptom was sustained fever, followed by fatigue, anorexia, peripheral edema, and weight loss. Furthermore, splenomegaly, pleural effusion, and ascites were observed to be associated with CD. Surgical resection and siltuximab were the preferred treatment modalities for UCD and MCD, respectively, with favorable symptomatic, laboratory, and radiologic outcomes and safety profiles. The overall survival was 90.2%, with no significant difference between the UCD and MCD groups (p=0.073), but progression-free survival was significantly poorer in the MCD group (p=0.001). Age ≥60 years and splenomegaly significantly affected the overall and progression-free survival rates.ConclusionPatients with UCD had favorable outcomes with surgical resection of a solitary mass, whereas in patients with MCD, old age and splenomegaly were identified as independent prognostic factors. Further well-designed prospective studies under advancing knowledge of the pathophysiology of MCD are warranted to establish suitable guidelines for the discontinuation or prolonging infusion intervals of siltuximab and treatment modalities for HHV-8 positive MCD patients or patients with siltuximab failure.

Project description:BackgroundBiologic therapies have greatly improved outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Yet, our ability to predict long-term remission and persistence or continuation of therapy remains limited. This study explores predictors of remission and persistence of the initial biologic therapy in patients after 12 years. Furthermore, outcomes with adalimumab and etanercept are compared.Patients and methodsRA and PsA patients were prospectively recruited from a biologic clinic. Outcomes on commencing therapy, at 1 year and 12 years were reviewed. Demographics, medications, morning stiffness, patient global health score, tender and swollen joint counts, antibody status, CRP and HAQ were collected. Outcomes at 1 year and 12 years are reported and predictors of biologic persistence and EULAR-defined remission (DAS28-CRP < 2.6) are examined with univariate and multivariate analysis.ResultsA total of 403 patients (274 RA and 129 PsA) were analysed. PsA patients were more likely to be male, in full-time employment and have completed higher education. PsA had higher remission rates than RA at both 1 year (60.3% versus 34.5%, p < 0.001) and 12 years (91.3% versus 60.6%, p < 0.001). This difference persisted when patients were matched for baseline disease activity (p < 0.001). Biologic continuation rates were high for RA and PsA at 1 year (49.6% versus 58.9%) and 12 years (38.2% versus 52.3%). In PsA, patients starting on etanercept had lower CRP at 12 years (p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis showed 1-year continuation [OR 4.28 (1.28-14.38)] and 1-year low-disease activity [OR 3.90 (95% CI 1.05-14.53)] was predictive of a 12-year persistence. Persistence with initial biologic at 12 years [OR 4.98 (95% CI 1.83-13.56)] and male gender [OR 4.48 (95% CI 1.25-16.01)] predicted 12 year remission.ConclusionsThis is the first study to show better response to biologic therapy in PsA compared to RA at 12 years. Long-term persistence with initial biologic agent was high and was predicted by biologic persistence and low-disease activity at 1 year. Interestingly, PsA patients had higher levels of employment, educational attainment, and long-term remission rates compared to RA patients.

Project description:AimTo investigate the real-world effectiveness of pharmacological treatments (buprenorphine, methadone) of opioid use disorder (OUD).DesignA nation-wide, register-based cohort study.SettingSweden.ParticipantsAll residents aged 16-64 years living in Sweden using OUD medication from July 2005 to December 2016 (n = 5757, 71.8% men) were identified from registers of prescriptions, inpatient and specialized outpatient care, causes of death, sickness absence and disability pensions.MeasurementsMain outcome: hospitalization due to OUD.Secondary outcomeshospitalization due to any cause; death due to all, natural and external causes. Mortality was analyzed with between-individual multivariate-adjusted Cox hazards regression model. Recurrent outcomes, such as hospitalizations, were analyzed with within-individual analyses to eliminate selection bias. OUD medication use versus non-use was modelled with PRE2DUP (from prescription drug purchases to drug use periods) method.FindingsBuprenorphine [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54-0.97] and methadone (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59-0.93) use were associated with significantly lower risk of OUD hospitalization, but not any-cause hospitalizations, compared with the time-periods when the same individual did not use OUD medication. The use of buprenorphine and methadone were both associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.34-0.59; HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41-0.63, respectively), compared with non-use of both medications. Similar results were found for risk of mortality due to external causes (HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.27-0.54; HR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.29-0.53, respectively), but not for mortality due to natural causes. The risk of OUD hospitalization and all-cause mortality was decreased in all duration categories of studied medications (< 30, 31-180, 181-365 and >365 days), except for methadone use less than 30 days.ConclusionsThe use of buprenorphine and methadone are both associated with a significantly lower risk of hospitalization due to opioid use disorder and death due to all and external causes, when compared with non-use.