Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

8 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Review of Self-Reported Data from UK Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System (DIYAPS) Users to Determine Whether Demographic of Population Affects Use or Outcomes.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

This study investigates the use of do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems (DIYAPS) in the UK, and whether self-reported outcomes associated with them are affected by the demographics of the user.

Methods

An online survey was conducted to assess user demographic data and self-reported time-in-range (TIR) outcomes. Statistical analysis was undertaken to review the results and check whether there were major differences in change in TIR across age, gender and duration of diabetes.

Results

Of 253 valid responses to the survey across a wide age range of users, 74.4% related to adult users and 25.6% related to under-16s. The majority (65.6%) used AndroidAPS, but there was greater use of Loop (43.1%) amongst under-16s than amongst adults (25.9%). Correspondingly, more under-16s (40.0%) than adults (24.3%) used Omnipod Eros. A 17.3% (± 13.7%) increase in time in range was reported across all participants, with no significant differences observed between age groups, genders or diabetes duration groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The results show that these systems are being used by both genders, and that users cover a wide range of ages and diabetes durations. They also show that improvements in self-reported DIYAPS healthcare outcomes may not be specific to any particular age, gender or duration of diabetes, and the results may provide additional insights into the applicability of the algorithms by demographic. This study may also inform healthcare professionals about the use and effectiveness of DIYAPS solutions.

SUBMITTER: Street TJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8266962 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Using a Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas: Perspectives from Patients and Diabetes Providers.

Project description:BackgroundA growing number of people with diabetes are choosing to adopt do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system (DIYAPS) despite a lack of approval from the US Food and Drug Administration.We describe patients' experiences using DIYAPS, and patient and diabetes providers' perspectives on the use of such technology.MethodsWe distributed surveys to patients and diabetes providers to assess each group's perspectives on the use of DIYAPS. The patient survey also assessed glycemic control and impact on sleep. The patient survey was distributed in February 2019 via Facebook and Twitter (n = 101). The provider survey was distributed via the American Association of Diabetes Educators' e-mail newsletter in April 2019 and the Pediatric Endocrine Society membership e-mail list in May 2019 (n = 152).ResultsPatients overwhelmingly described improvements in glycemic control and sleep quality: 94% reported improvement in time in range, and 64% reported improvement in all five areas assessed. Eighty-nine percent of patients described DIYAPS as "Safe" or "Very Safe," compared to only 27% of providers. Most felt encouraged by their diabetes provider to continue using DIYAPS, but few described providers as knowledgeable regarding its use. Providers cited a lack of experience with such systems and an inability to troubleshoot them as their most significant challenges.ConclusionsDespite evidence that DIYAPS usage is increasing, our surveys suggest that patients' adoption of this technology and trust in it is outpacing that of diabetes providers. Providers must be aware of this growing population of patients and familiarize themselves with DIYAPS to support patients using this technology.

| S-EPMC7753849 | biostudies-literature

Do-It-Yourself Open Artificial Pancreas System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Real-World Data.

Project description:Few studies have been conducted among Asian children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) using do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system (DIY-APS). We evaluated real-world data of pediatric T1DM patients using DIY-APS. Data were obtained for 10 patients using a DIY-APS with algorithms. We collected sensor glucose and insulin delivery data from each participant for a period of 4 weeks. Average glycosylated hemoglobin was 6.2%±0.3%. The mean percentage of time that glucose level remained in the target range of 70 to 180 mg/dL was 82.4%±7.8%. Other parameters including time above range, time below range and mean glucose were also within the recommended level, similar to previous commercial and DIY-APS studies. However, despite meeting the target range, unadjusted gaps were still observed between the median basal setting and temporary basal insulin, which should be handled by healthcare providers.

| S-EPMC8831819 | biostudies-literature

A systematic review of whether COVID-19 randomized controlled trials reported on demographic and clinical characteristics.

Project description:PurposeWe aim to assess the reporting of key patient-level demographic and clinical characteristics among COVID-19 related randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsWe queried English-language articles from PubMed, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and the CDC library of gray literature databases using keywords of "coronavirus," "covid," "clinical trial" and "randomized controlled trial" from January 2020 to June 2021. From the search, we conducted an initial review to rule-out duplicate entries, identify those that met inclusion criteria (i.e., had results), and exclude those that did not meet the definition of an RCT. Lastly, we abstracted the demographic and clinical characteristics reported on within each RCT.ResultsFrom the initial 43 627 manuscripts, our final eligible manuscripts consisted of 149 RCTs described in 137 articles. Most of the RCTs (113/149) studied potential treatments, while fewer studied vaccines (29), prophylaxis strategies (5), and interventions to prevent transmission among those infected (2). Study populations ranged from 10 to 38 206 participants (median = 100, IQR: 60-300). All 149 RCTs reported on age, 147 on sex, 50 on race, and 110 on the prevalence of at least one comorbidity. No RCTs reported on income, urban versus rural residence, or other indicators of socioeconomic status (SES).ConclusionsLimited reporting on race and other markers of SES make it difficult to draw conclusions about specific external target populations without making strong assumptions that treatment effects are homogenous. These findings highlight the need for more robust reporting on the clinical and demographic profiles of patients enrolled in COVID-19 related RCTs.

| S-EPMC9538362 | biostudies-literature

Looping with Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas Systems During Ramadan Fasting in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Perspectives of a User and a Physician.

Project description:Hybrid closed-loop automated insulin delivery systems have helped type 1 diabetes (T1D) users close the loop between glucose monitoring and insulin delivery, a very important step in efforts to simulate the glucose-responsive insulin secretory function of a healthy pancreas. Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas Systems (DIY APS) are a form of hybrid closed-loop system that use open-source algorithms, which govern the delivery of insulin in response to interstitial glucose and other variables that are personalized to an individual. The flexibility and customization afforded by these systems make them amenable for use in different worldly circumstances, one of which is fasting during the annual occurrence of Ramadan for observant Muslims. Here, we present the views of a DIY APS user who was able to fast successfully on most days of Ramadan after adopting this system, and the overview of a physician on these systems, with a focus on fasting during Ramadan with T1D.

| S-EPMC7480212 | biostudies-literature

Cybersecurity in Artificial Pancreas Experiments.

Project description:Medical devices have transformed modern health care, and ongoing experimental medical technology trials (such as the artificial pancreas) have the potential to significantly improve the treatment of several chronic conditions, including diabetes mellitus. However, we suggest that, to date, the essential concept of cybersecurity has not been adequately addressed in this field. This article discusses several key issues of cybersecurity in medical devices and proposes some solutions. In addition, it outlines the current requirements and efforts of regulatory agencies to increase awareness of this topic and to improve cybersecurity.

| S-EPMC4556085 | biostudies-literature

Use of a do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system is associated with better glucose management and higher quality of life among adults with type 1 diabetes.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies show that the use of do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system (DIYAPS) may be associated with better glycemic control characterized by improved estimated hemoglobin A1c (eHbA1c) and time in range among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, few studies have demonstrated the changes in laboratory-measured HbA1c, which is a more accepted index for glycemic control, after using a DIYAPS.MethodsThis is a retrospective before-after study approaching patients who reported self-use of AndroidAPS. The main inclusion criteria included: T1D; aged ⩾18 years; having complete record of ⩾3 months of continuous AndroidAPS use; with laboratory-measured HbA1c and quality of life scale data before and after 3 months of AndroidAPS use; and not pregnant. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c between baseline and 3 months after initiation of AndroidAPS use.ResultsOverall, 15 patients (10 females) were included; the median age was 32.2 years (range: 19.2-69.4), median diabetes duration was 9.7 years (range: 1.8-23.7) and median baseline HbA1c was 7.3% (range: 6.4-10.1). The 3 months of AndroidAPS use was associated with substantial reductions in HbA1c [6.79% (SD: 1.29) versus 7.63% (SD: 1.06), p = 0.002] and glycemic variability when compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy. A lower level of fear of hypoglycemia [22.13 points (SD: 6.87) versus 26.27 points (SD: 5.82), p = 0.010] was also observed after using AndroidAPS.ConclusionsThe 3 months of AndroidAPS use was associated with significant improvements in glucose management and quality of life among adults with T1D.

| S-EPMC7453453 | biostudies-literature

Development platform for artificial pancreas algorithms.

Project description:Background and aimsAssessing algorithms of artificial pancreas systems is critical in developing automated and fault-tolerant solutions that work outside clinical settings. The development and evaluation of algorithms can be facilitated with a platform that conducts virtual clinical trials. We present in this paper a clinically validated cloud-based distributed platform that supports the development and comprehensive testing of single and dual-hormone algorithms for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).MethodsThe platform is built on principles of object-oriented design and runs user algorithms in real-time virtual clinical trials utilizing a multi-threaded environment enabled by concurrent execution over a cloud infrastructure. The platform architecture isolates user algorithms located on personal machines from proprietary patient data running on the cloud. Users import a plugin into their algorithms (Matlab, Python, or Java) to connect to the platform. Once connected, users interact with a graphical interface to design experimental protocols for their trials. Protocols include trial duration in days, mealtimes and amounts, variability in mealtimes and amounts, carbohydrate counting errors, snacks, and onboard insulin levels.ResultsThe platform facilitates development by solving the ODE model in the cloud on large CPU-optimized machines, providing a 62% improvement in memory, speed and CPU utilization. Users can easily debug & modify code, test multiple strategies, and generate detailed clinical performance reports. We validated and integrated into the platform a glucoregulatory system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) parameterized with clinical data to mimic the inter and intra-day variability of glucose responses of 15 T1DM patients.ConclusionThe platform utilizes the validated patient model to conduct virtual clinical trials for the rapid development and testing of closed-loop algorithms for T1DM.

| S-EPMC7746189 | biostudies-literature

Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome.

Project description:ObjectiveTo systematically compare the outcomes of participants in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with those in comparable non-participants who received the same or similar treatment.Data sourcesBibliographic databases, reference lists from eligible articles, medical journals, and study authors.Review methodsRCTs and cohort studies that evaluated the clinical outcomes of participants in RCTs and comparable non-participants who received the same or similar treatment.ResultsFive RCTs (six comparisons) and 50 cohort studies (85 comparisons) provided data on 31,140 patients treated in RCTs and 20,380 comparable patients treated outside RCTs. In the five RCTs, in which patients were given the option of participating or not, the comparisons provided limited information because of small sample sizes (a total of 412 patients) and the nature of the questions considered. 73 dichotomous outcomes were compared, of which 59 reported no statistically significant differences. For patients treated within RCTs, 10 comparisons reported significantly better outcomes and four reported significantly worse outcomes. Significantly heterogeneity was found (I2 = 89%) among the comparisons of 73 dichotomous outcomes; none of our a priori explanatory factors helped explain this heterogeneity. The 18 comparisons of continuous outcomes showed no significant differences in heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). The overall pooled estimate for continuous outcomes of the effect of participating in an RCT was not significant (standardised mean difference 0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.10 to 0.12).ConclusionNo strong evidence was found of a harmful or beneficial effect of participating in RCTs compared with receiving the same or similar treatment outside such trials.

| S-EPMC558011 | biostudies-literature

Beliefs about others' intentions determine whether cooperation is the faster choice.

Project description:Is collaboration the fast choice for humans? Past studies proposed that cooperation is a behavioural default, based on Response Times (RT) findings. Here we contend that the individual's reckoning of the immediate social environment shapes her predisposition to cooperate and, hence, response latencies. In a social dilemma game, we manipulate the beliefs about the partner's intentions to cooperate and show that they act as a switch that determines cooperation and defection RTs; when the partner's intention to cooperate is perceived as high, cooperation choices are speeded up, while defection is slowed down. Importantly, this social context effect holds across varying expected payoffs, indicating that it modulates behaviour regardless of choices' similarity in monetary terms. Moreover, this pattern is moderated by individual variability in social preferences: Among conditional cooperators, high cooperation beliefs speed up cooperation responses and slow down defection. Among free-riders, defection is always faster and more likely than cooperation, while high cooperation beliefs slow down all decisions. These results shed new light on the conflict of choices account of response latencies, as well as on the intuitive cooperation hypothesis, and can help to correctly interpret and reconcile previous, apparently contradictory results, by considering the role of context in social dilemmas.

| S-EPMC5951794 | biostudies-literature

Clinical evaluation of a personalized artificial pancreas.

Project description:An artificial pancreas (AP) that automatically regulates blood glucose would greatly improve the lives of individuals with diabetes. Such a device would prevent hypo- and hyperglycemia along with associated long- and short-term complications as well as ease some of the day-to-day burden of frequent blood glucose measurements and insulin administration.We conducted a pilot clinical trial evaluating an individualized, fully automated AP using commercial devices. Two trials (n = 22, n(subjects) = 17) were conducted using a multiparametric formulation of model predictive control and an insulin-on-board algorithm such that the control algorithm, or "brain," can be embedded on a chip as part of a future mobile device. The protocol evaluated the control algorithm for three main challenges: 1) normalizing glycemia from various initial glucose levels, 2) maintaining euglycemia, and 3) overcoming an unannounced meal of 30 ± 5 g carbohydrates.Initial glucose values ranged from 84-251 mg/dL. Blood glucose was kept in the near-normal range (80-180 mg/dL) for an average of 70% of the trial time. The low and high blood glucose indices were 0.34 and 5.1, respectively.These encouraging short-term results reveal the ability of a control algorithm tailored to an individual's glucose characteristics to successfully regulate glycemia, even when faced with unannounced meals or initial hyperglycemia. To our knowledge, this represents the first truly fully automated multiparametric model predictive control algorithm with insulin-on-board that does not rely on user intervention to regulate blood glucose in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

| S-EPMC3609541 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data