Dataset Information

Immune correlates of therapy outcomes in women with cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Immune markers have been correlated with prognosis in a variety of solid tumors, including cervical cancer.

Objective

To review the literature on hematologic and immune markers and their association with recurrence and survival among patients with cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation.

Evidence review

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines via searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Library using keywords regarding cervical cancer, immune markers, and HIV. Studies involving patients treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy were selected and reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.

Findings

A total of 737 studies were identified, of which 314 assessed immune biomarkers in immunocompetent patients (30 included in the final analysis) and 327 studies in immunosuppressed patients (5 included in the final analysis). The strongest prognostic indicators were lymphopenia and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Other potential markers included HPV-specific lymphocyte response, cytokine profile, expression of immune-blocking antigens on cell surfaces, and tumor-associated lymphocyte, macrophage, and neutrophil infiltration. Studies of immunosuppressed patients described more severe cytopenic changes overall and concluded that viral suppression led to improved outcomes.

Conclusions

The immunologic interplay at work in cervical cancer development, progression, and treatment is complex. Strong evidence was found in favor of lymphopenia and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio being prognostic for worse outcomes with other markers showing potential associations as well. Although the interpretation of immune status with regard to treatment approach remains unclear, future studies should aim to tailor treatment that minimizes possible detrimental immune effects.

SUBMITTER: Lakomy DS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8267128 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The benefit of adjuvant hysterectomy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally-advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to systematically search the literature and perform a meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients subjected to CCRT with hysterectomy and those who underwent CCRT alone. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Google scholar databases were searched. A meta-analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with meta-regression was performed for the following moderators: Disease stage, histology and proportion of radical hysterectomy. Data from 14 studies were included. The results indicated that patients who received CCRT with hysterectomy had significantly better OS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91; I2=19%; P=0.007) and DFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.93; I2=27%; P=0.01) than those treated with CCRT alone. However, in a subgroup analysis by study type, the results were significant only for retrospective studies but not for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, only 2 RCTs were included with small sample size, heterogeneity and low overall quality. Subgroup analyses based on the use of brachytherapy in the CCRT with hysterectomy group demonstrated no difference in OS and DFS between the two groups. Regarding the absolute numbers of death and recurrence events, no significant difference in mortality (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.33; I2=0%; P=0.64) was determined between the two groups, but a significantly reduced incidence of recurrence was observed in the CCRT with hysterectomy group (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79; I2=29%; P=0.0002). The meta-regression results point to a significant influence of the proportion of stage II patients on OS. Despite the overall analysis indicating improved OS and DFS with the use of adjuvant hysterectomy after CCRT, subgroup analysis based on similar treatment protocols failed to demonstrate any significant benefit of hysterectomy in LACC. However, the results indicated that the recurrence rate may be higher in patients undergoing CCRT without hysterectomy. The limited quality of the studies included and selection bias from retrospective studies restrict the possibility to draw strong conclusions.

Project description:BackgroundThe call for women-centred approaches to reduce labour interventions, particularly primary caesarean section, has renewed an interest in gaining a better understanding of natural labour progression.ObjectiveTo synthesise available data on the cervical dilatation patterns during spontaneous labour of 'low-risk' women with normal perinatal outcomes.Search strategyPubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, POPLINE, Global Health Library, and reference lists of eligible studies.Selection criteriaObservational studies and other study designs.Data collection and analysisTwo authors extracted data on: maternal characteristics; labour interventions; the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre; and the duration of labour from dilatation at admission through to 10 cm. We pooled data across studies using weighted medians and employed the Bootstrap-t method to generate the corresponding confidence bounds.Main resultsSeven observational studies describing labour patterns for 99 971 women met our inclusion criteria. The median time to advance by 1 cm in nulliparous women was longer than 1 hour until a dilatation of 5 cm was reached, with markedly rapid progress after 6 cm. Similar labour progression patterns were observed in parous women. The 95th percentiles for both parity groups suggest that it was not uncommon for some women to reach 10 cm, despite dilatation rates that were much slower than the 1-cm/hour threshold for most part of their first stage of labours.ConclusionAn expectation of a minimum cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour throughout the first stage of labour is unrealistic for most healthy nulliparous and parous women. Our findings call into question the universal application of clinical standards that are conceptually based on an expectation of linear labour progress in all women.FundingUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).Tweetable abstractCervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour throughout labour is unrealistic for most women, regardless of parity.

Project description:PurposeCervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death among women worldwide, and women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) carry the highest burden of disease. Chemoradiation (CRT) is the current standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer, without specific treatment modifications based on HIV status. This systematic review evaluates existing literature reporting differences in outcomes between HIV+ and HIV- women with invasive cervical cancer treated with CRT.Methods and materialsSearches were conducted through Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently conducted article selection; articles were selected by title, then abstract, and then by full text content. Data were extracted using a structured form.ResultsThirteen articles were included in the analysis, all of which were either retrospective or prospective cohort studies published between 2012 and 2018, and most of which were conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa. Treatment outcomes included treatment response, survival, toxicities, and quality of life. The majority of studies (8 of 13) reported no differences in treatment outcomes by HIV status. Out of 8 studies that assessed survival, 6 reported no significant difference based on HIV status. All 4 studies assessing treatment response found no significant differences based on HIV status. Among 6 studies primarily assessing treatment toxicity, 3 showed no differences based on HIV status. Factors affecting treatment outcomes, such as treatment selection bias, pretreatment hemoglobin levels, and antiretroviral therapy administration, were not systematically accounted for.ConclusionsThe majority of studies analyzed showed no differences in treatment outcomes, including overall toxicity, treatment response, or mortality, on the basis of HIV infection status. These results suggest CRT should continue to be the treatment of choice for locally invasive cervical cancer regardless of HIV status. Further study is required to more precisely account for other variables that influence treatment outcome.