Dataset Information

Altered K-complex morphology during sustained inspiratory airflow limitation is associated with next-day lapses in vigilance in obstructive sleep apnea.

ABSTRACT:

Study objectives

Determine if changes in K-complexes associated with sustained inspiratory airflow limitation (SIFL) during N2 sleep are associated with next-day vigilance and objective sleepiness.

Methods

Data from thirty subjects with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea who completed three in-lab polysomnograms: diagnostic, on therapeutic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and on suboptimal CPAP (4 cmH2O below optimal titrated CPAP level) were analyzed. Four 20-min psychomotor vigilance tests (PVT) were performed after each PSG, every 2 h. Changes in the proportion of spontaneous K-complexes and spectral characteristics surrounding K-complexes were evaluated for K-complexes associated with both delta (∆SWAK), alpha (∆αK) frequencies.

Results

Suboptimal CPAP induced SIFL (14.7 (20.9) vs 2.9 (9.2); %total sleep time, p < 0.001) with a small increase in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI3A: 6.5 (7.7) vs 1.9 (2.3); p < 0.01) versus optimal CPAP. K-complex density (num./min of stage N2) was higher on suboptimal CPAP (0.97 ± 0.7 vs 0.65±0.5, #/min, mean ± SD, p < 0.01) above and beyond the effect of age, sex, AHI3A, and duration of SIFL. A decrease in ∆SWAK with suboptimal CPAP was associated with increased PVT lapses and explained 17% of additional variance in PVT lapses. Within-night during suboptimal CPAP K-complexes appeared to alternate between promoting sleep and as arousal surrogates. Electroencephalographic changes were not associated with objective sleepiness.

Conclusions

Sustained inspiratory airflow limitation is associated with altered K-complex morphology including the increased occurrence of K-complexes with bursts of alpha as arousal surrogates. These findings suggest that sustained inspiratory flow limitation may be associated with nonvisible sleep fragmentation and contribute to increased lapses in vigilance.

SUBMITTER: Parekh A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8271137 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatients suffering from combined obstructive and interstitial lung disease (O-ILD) represent a pathological entity which still has to be well clinically described. The aim of this descriptive and explorative study was to describe the phenotype and functional characteristics of a cohort of patients suffering from functional obstruction in a population of ILD patients in order to raise the need of dedicated prospective observational studies and the evaluation of the impact of anti-fibrotic therapies.MethodsThe current authors conducted a retrospective study including 557 ILD patients, with either obstructive (O-ILD, n = 82) or non-obstructive (non O-ILD, n = 475) pattern. Patients included were mainly males (54%) with a mean age of 62 years.ResultsPatients with O-ILD exhibited a characteristic functional profile with reduced percent predicted forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1) [65% (53-77) vs 83% (71-96), p < 0.00001], small airway involvement assessed by maximum expiratory flow (MEF) 25/75 [29% (20-41) vs 81% (64-108), p < 0.00001], reduced sGaw [60% (42-75) vs 87% (59-119), p < 0.01] and sub-normal functional residual capacity (FRC) [113% (93-134) vs 92% (75-109), p < 0.00001] with no impaired of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO) compared to those without obstruction. Total lung capacity (TLC) was increased in O-ILD patients [93% (82-107) vs 79% (69-91), p < 0.00001]. Of interest, DLCO sharply dropped in O-ILD patients over a 5-year follow-up. We did not identify a significant increase in mortality in patients with O-ILD. Interestingly, the global mortality was increased in the specific sub-group of patients with O-ILD and no progressive fibrosing ILD phenotype and in those with connective tissue disease associated ILD especially in case of rheumatoid arthritis.ConclusionsThe authors individualized a specific functional-based pattern of ILD patients with obstructive lung disease, who are at risk of increased mortality and rapid DLCO decline over time. As classically those patients are excluded from clinical trials, a dedicated prospective study would be of interest in order to define more precisely treatment response of those patients.

Project description:Study objectivesThe presence of flow limitation during sleep is associated with adverse health consequences independent of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity (apnea-hypopnea index, AHI), but remains extremely challenging to quantify. Here we present a unique library and an accompanying automated method that we apply to investigate flow limitation during sleep.MethodsA library of 117,871 breaths (N = 40 participants) were visually classified (certain flow limitation, possible flow limitation, normal) using airflow shape and physiological signals (ventilatory drive per intra-esophageal diaphragm EMG). An ordinal regression model was developed to quantify flow limitation certainty using flow-shape features (e.g. flattening, scooping); breath-by-breath agreement (Cohen's ƙ); and overnight flow limitation frequency (R2, %breaths in certain or possible categories during sleep) were compared against visual scoring. Subsequent application examined flow limitation frequency during arousals and stable breathing, and associations with ventilatory drive.ResultsThe model (23 features) assessed flow limitation with good agreement (breath-by-breath ƙ = 0.572, p < 0.001) and minimal error (overnight flow limitation frequency R2 = 0.86, error = 7.2%). Flow limitation frequency was largely independent of AHI (R2 = 0.16) and varied widely within individuals with OSA (74[32-95]%breaths, mean[range], AHI > 15/h, N = 22). Flow limitation was unexpectedly frequent but variable during arousals (40[5-85]%breaths) and stable breathing (58[12-91]%breaths), and was associated with elevated ventilatory drive (R2 = 0.26-0.29; R2 < 0.01 AHI v. drive).ConclusionsOur method enables quantification of flow limitation frequency, a key aspect of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing that is independent of the AHI and often unavailable. Flow limitation frequency varies widely between individuals, is prevalent during arousals and stable breathing, and reveals elevated ventilatory drive. Clinical trial registration: The current observational physiology study does not qualify as a clinical trial.