Dataset Information

Trusting Other Vehicles' Automatic Emergency Braking Decreases Self-Protective Driving.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

We focused on drivers in close proximity to vehicles with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). We examined whether the belief that an approaching vehicle is equipped with automatic emergency braking (AEB) influences behavior of those drivers.

Background

In addition to benefits of ADAS, previous studies have demonstrated negative behavioral adaptation, that is, behavioral changes after introduction of ADAS, by its users. However, little is known about whether negative behavioral adaptation can occur for nonusers in close proximity to vehicles with ADAS.

Method

Experienced (Experiment 1) and novice (Experiment 2) drivers drove a simulator vehicle without ADAS and tried to pass through intersections. We manipulated participants' belief about whether an approaching vehicle had AEB and time-to-arrival of the approaching vehicle. Participants kept constant speed or pressed the brake pedal before entering each intersection. In Experiment 2, participants rated their trust in AEB by a questionnaire after driving.

Results

In both experiments, belief about the approaching vehicle's AEB did not influence braking probability; however, belief delayed initiation of braking. The effect of belief on braking latency was only observed when trust in AEB was higher in Experiment 2.

Conclusion

Negative behavioral adaptation can occur for nonusers in close proximity to users of AEB, and trust in AEB plays an important role.

Application

When evaluating the effect of ADAS, the possible behavioral change of surrounding nonusers as well as users should be taken into account. To establish consumers' trust accurately, advertisements (e.g., TV commercials) must carefully consider their messages.

SUBMITTER: Kinosada Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8274173 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDriving self-restriction is a well-documented among older drivers but might also occur among younger drivers. Little is known about the driving patterns of emergency department (ED) patients, who may be a high-risk population for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). We sought to compare the driving patterns and MVCs of younger and older adult ED patients in order to inform development of injury prevention interventions in EDs.MethodsWe surveyed English-speaking younger adult (age 25-64) and older adult (age ≥65) ED patients, excluding non-drivers and those who were cognitively-impaired or too sick to participate. We compared drivers by age group and used logistic regression with adjustment for driving frequency to examine factors associated with driving self-restriction.ResultsOf those eligible, 82% (n=178) of younger adult and 91% (n=134) of older adult patients participated; approximately half were women. Similar proportions of younger and older adult patients reported driving everyday/almost everyday (80%) but also self-restricting driving in inclimate weather (48%), heavy traffic (27%), in unfamiliar places (21%), when travelling with passengers (1.6%) or when alone (1.3%). Fewer younger adult than older adult patients avoided driving at night (22% versus 49%) or on highways (6.7% versus 26%). In multivariable logistic regression, factors significantly associated self-imposed driving restriction in ≥1 driving situation were female gender (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.40; 95%CI 1.42-4.05) and ever feeling "confused, nervous or uncomfortable" while driving (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.03-3.39). There was a non-significant trend for differences in proportions between younger adult (11%) and older adult (6.8%) drivers reporting ≥1 MVC as a driver in the past 12 months.ConclusionsSimilar proportions of younger and older adult ED patients self-restrict driving, albeit in different situations, which has implications for behavioral interventions for injury prevention and for education of patients and medical providers.

Project description:Analyzing human body movement is a critical aspect of biomechanical studies in road safety. While most studies have traditionally focused on assessing the head-neck system due to the restraint provided by seat belts, it is essential to examine the entire pelvis-thorax-head kinematic chain when these body regions are free to move. The absence of restraint systems is prevalent in public transport and is also being considered for future integration into autonomous vehicles operating at low speeds. This article presents an experimental study examining the movement of the pelvis, thorax and head of 18 passengers seated without seat belts during emergency braking in an autonomous bus. The movement was recorded using a video analysis system capturing 100 frames per second. Reflective markers were placed on the knee, pelvis, lumbar region, thorax, neck and head, enabling precise measurement of the movement of each body segment and the joints of the lumbar and cervical spine. Various kinematic variables, including angles, displacements, angular velocities and accelerations, were measured. The results delineate distinct phases of body movement during braking and elucidate the coordination and sequentiality of pelvis, thorax and head rotation. Additionally, the study reveals correlations between pelvic rotation, lumbar flexion, and vertical trunk movement, shedding light on their potential impact on neck compression. Notably, it is observed that the elevation of the C7 vertebra is more closely linked to pelvic tilt than lumbar flexion. Furthermore, the study identifies that the maximum angular acceleration of the head and the maximum tangential force occur during the trunk's rebound against the seatback once the vehicle comes to a complete stop. However, these forces are found to be insufficient to cause neck injury. While this study serves as a preliminary investigation, its findings underscore the need to incorporate complete trunk kinematics, particularly of the pelvis, into braking and impact studies, rather than solely focusing on the head-neck system, as is common in most research endeavors.