Dataset Information

Predictive performance of parent-metabolite population pharmacokinetic models of (S)-ketamine in healthy volunteers.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The recent repurposing of ketamine as treatment for pain and depression has increased the need for accurate population pharmacokinetic (PK) models to inform the design of new clinical trials. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to externally validate available PK models on (S)-(nor)ketamine concentrations with in-house data and to improve the best performing model when necessary.

Methods

Based on predefined criteria, five models were selected from literature. Data of two previously performed clinical trials on (S)-ketamine administration in healthy volunteers were available for validation. The predictive performances of the selected models were compared through visual predictive checks (VPCs) and calculation of the (root) mean (square) prediction errors (ME and RMSE). The available data was used to adapt the best performing model through alterations to the model structure and re-estimation of inter-individual variability (IIV).

Results

The model developed by Fanta et al. (Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71:441-447, 2015) performed best at predicting the (S)-ketamine concentration over time, but failed to capture the (S)-norketamine C_max correctly. Other models with similar population demographics and study designs had estimated relatively small distribution volumes of (S)-ketamine and thus overpredicted concentrations after start of infusion, most likely due to the influence of circulatory dynamics and sampling methodology. Model predictions were improved through a reduction in complexity of the (S)-(nor)ketamine model and re-estimation of IIV.

Conclusion

The modified model resulted in accurate predictions of both (S)-ketamine and (S)-norketamine and thereby provides a solid foundation for future simulation studies of (S)-(nor)ketamine PK in healthy volunteers after (S)-ketamine infusion.

SUBMITTER: Otto ME

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8275530 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectiveAmikacin is preferred in treating Gram-negative infections in neonates and it has a narrow therapeutic window. The population pharmacokinetic modeling approach can aid in designing optimal dosage regimens for amikacin in neonates. In this study, we attempted to identify the suitable population pharmacokinetic model from the published reports for the study population from an Indian setting.MethodsPublished population pharmacokinetic studies for amikacin in neonates were identified. Data on structural models and typical pharmacokinetic parameters were extracted from the studies. For the clinical study, neonates who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study from the NICU, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, during Jan 2020 to March 2022. Drug concentrations were estimated, and demographic and clinical data were collected. Identified population pharmacokinetic models were used to predict the amikacin concentrations in neonates. Predicted concentrations were compared against the observed concentrations. Differences between predicted and observed concentrations were quantified using statistical measures. The population pharmacokinetic model, which was able to predict the data well, is considered a suitable model for the study population. Dosing regimens were suggested for neonates using the pharmacometric simulation approach generated by the selected model.ResultsA total of 43 plasma samples were collected from 31 neonates. Twelve population pharmacokinetic models were found for amikacin in neonates. The predictive performance of the 12 studies was performed using clinical data. A two-compartment model reported by Illamola et al. predicted the amikacin concentrations better than other models. Illamola et al. reported creatinine clearance and body weight as the significant covariates impacting the pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin. This model was able to predict the clinical data with 29.97% and 0.686 of relative median absolute prediction error and relative root mean square error, respectively, which is the best among the published models. The Illamola et al. model was selected as the final model to perform pharmacometric simulations for the subjects with different combinations of creatinine clearance and body weight. Dosage regimens were designed to attain target therapeutic concentrations for the virtual subjects and a nomogram was developed.ConclusionsThe population pharmacokinetic model reported by the Illamola et al. model was selected as the final model to explain the clinical data with the lowest relative median absolute prediction error and relative root mean square error when compared with other models. An amikacin nomogram was developed for the neonates whose creatinine clearance and body weight ranged between 10 and 90 mL/min and between 2 and 4 kg, respectively. A developed nomogram can assist clinicians to design an optimal dosage regimen of amikacin for term neonates.

Project description:IntroductionThe pharmacokinetics of vancomycin are highly variable among neonates, which makes dosing challenging in this population. However, adequate drug exposure is critical, especially when treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Utilization of population pharmacokinetic models and Bayesian methods offers the potential for developing individualized therapeutic approaches. To meet this need, a neonatal vancomycin population pharmacokinetic model was recently published. The current study sought to externally evaluate the predictive performance and generalizability of this model.MethodsA retrospective chart review of neonates who received vancomycin and had ≥1 peak and ≥1 trough concentrations at five Intermountain Healthcare neonatal intensive care units from 2006 to 2013 was performed and served as the external validation cohort. The published population pharmacokinetic model was implemented in NONMEM 7.2 with the structural and variance parameter values set equal to the estimates reported previously. The model was then used to predict the first peak and trough concentration for each neonate in the validation cohort and the model prediction error and absolute prediction error were calculated. Normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE) were also evaluated.ResultsA total of 243 neonates were studied with a median postmenstrual age of 33 (range: 23-54) weeks and a median weight of 1.6 (range: 0.4-6.8) kg. The model predicted the observed vancomycin concentrations with reasonable precision. For all vancomycin concentrations, the median prediction error was -0.8 (95% CI: -1.4 to -0.4) mg/L and the median absolute prediction error was 3.0 (95% CI: 2.7-3.5) mg/L. No trends in NPDE across weight, postmenstrual age, serum creatinine, or time after dose were observed.ConclusionAn evaluation of a recently published neonatal vancomycin population pharmacokinetic model in a large external dataset supported the predictive performance and generalizability of the model. This model may be useful in evaluating neonatal vancomycin dosing regimens and estimating the extent of drug exposure.