Dataset Information

The association between glycaemic control during hospitalization and risk of adverse events: A retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Hyperglycaemia is common during hospitalization; glycaemic targets in non-critical care settings have not been well studied. We assessed associations between inpatient glycaemic control and adverse events.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on non-critically ill medical patients hospitalized in a tertiary care hospital between 2015 and 2018. Mean glycaemia during the first four days of hospitalization was categorized as 4.0-7.0 mmol/L, 7.1-10.0 mmol/L and >10.0 mmol/L. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse events including mortality, infections, acute kidney injury, thromboembolic and cardiovascular events. The secondary outcome was hypoglycaemia, defined as any glycaemia <4.0 mmol/L. Logistic regression was used to assess adverse events, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hypoglycaemia risk.

Results

Our cohort included 1,368 patients, of whom 407 (29.8%) experienced an adverse event. We did not find associations between glycaemia of 4.0-7.0 mmol/L (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.23) or glycaemia of >10.0 mmol/L (adjusted OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.75-1.28) and the occurrence of adverse events, compared to a glycaemia of 7.1-10.0 mmol/L. Glycaemia of >10.0 mmol/L was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.21-2.45). Hypoglycaemia was associated with adverse events (adjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.31-2.60).

Conclusions

Neither glycaemia of 4.0-7.0 mmol/L nor glycaemia of >10.0mmol/L during non-critical care hospitalization was associated with increased adverse events. Glycaemia of >10.0 mmol/L was associated with increased hypoglycaemia, likely due to aggressive glucose lowering. These findings highlight the need for further studies to discern optimal inpatient glycaemic targets.

SUBMITTER: Deng L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8279636 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFlexible bronchoscopy is widely used to diagnose and treat various respiratory diseases. However, caution is warranted for post-bronchoscopy adverse events. Although desaturation frequently occurs during bronchoscopy, its clinical impact and the optimal oxygen saturation level during the procedure remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) level during bronchoscopy is associated with the development of post-bronchoscopy respiratory adverse events.MethodsIn this single-center retrospective cohort study conducted from March 2020 to February 2021, 569 patients were classified into high or low oxygen saturation groups based on the SpO2 level during bronchoscopy. The primary outcome was post-bronchoscopy respiratory adverse events, and secondary outcomes were other post-bronchoscopy adverse events and clinical outcomes.ResultsAmong 569 patients, 458 and 111 patients were classified into the high oxygen saturation (SpO2 > 96%) and low oxygen saturation (SpO2 ≤ 94%) groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the low oxygen saturation group had more post-bronchoscopy respiratory and febrile adverse events than the high oxygen saturation group. In the multivariable regression analysis, low SpO2 level during bronchoscopy was an independent risk factor for post-bronchoscopy respiratory adverse events (odds ratio = 3.16 [95% confidence interval 1.37-7.30]). In the low oxygen saturation group, the high-risk subgroups for post-bronchoscopy respiratory adverse events were the elderly, women, current smokers, and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or acute decompensated heart failure before bronchoscopy. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission, or mortality between the high and low oxygen saturation groups.ConclusionsClose monitoring is recommended for patients with SpO2 ≤ 94% during bronchoscopy due to the increased risk of respiratory adverse events after the procedure.

Project description:ImportanceAlthough better pain management has guided policies for opioid use over the past few decades, evidence is limited regarding how patterns of use are associated with the risk of potentially avoidable opioid-related adverse events.ObjectiveTo estimate the risk of harms associated with opioid dose and duration of use, and to ascertain whether the risk is modified by treatment indication and age.Design, setting, and participantsThis ad hoc cohort study followed up patients who were enrolled in a cluster randomized trial of medication reconciliation between October 1, 2014, and November 30, 2016, 12 months after they were discharged from the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. To be eligible for this study, patients needed to have filled at least 1 opioid prescription 3 months after discharge. Patients with a history of using methadone or buprenorphine were excluded. Data analyses were performed between February 1, 2019, and February 28, 2020.ExposuresTime-varying measures of opioid use included current use, daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dose, cumulative and continuous use duration, and type of ingredients in prescription opioids used. Hospitalization records, dispensed prescriptions records, and postdischarge interviews were used to evaluate adherence to the opioid prescriptions after discharge.Main outcomes and measuresOpioid-related emergency department visits, hospital readmissions, or all-cause death. Outcomes were ascertained using provincial medical services claims and hospitalization databases.ResultsOf 3486 participants in the cluster randomized trial (mean [SD] age of 69.6 [14.9] years; 2010 men [57.7%]), 1511 patients were included in this ad hoc cohort study. Among those with at least 1 opioid dispensation, 241 patients (15.9%) experienced an opioid-related emergency department visit, hospital readmission, or death. Results from marginal structural Cox proportional hazards regression models showed more than a 2-fold increase in the risk of opioid-related adverse events associated with a cumulative use duration of more than 90 days (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.25-5.27) compared with 1 to 30 days. A 3-fold risk increase was found with a mean daily dose higher than 90 MME (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.58-7.82) compared with 90 MME or lower.Conclusions and relevanceThis study found an association between risk of adverse health care events and higher opioid doses and longer treatment duration. This finding can inform policies for limiting opioid duration and dose to attenuate the risk of avoidable morbidity.

Project description:BackgroundHome care (HC) is a critical component of the ongoing restructuring of healthcare in Canada. It impacts three dimensions of healthcare delivery: primary healthcare, chronic disease management, and aging at home strategies. The purpose of our study is to investigate a significant safety dimension of HC, the occurrence of adverse events and their related outcomes. The study reports on the incidence of HC adverse events, the magnitude of the events, the types of events that occur, and the consequences experienced by HC clients in the province of Ontario.MethodsA retrospective cohort design was used, utilizing comprehensive secondary databases available for Ontario HC clients from the years 2008 and 2009. The data were derived from the Canadian Home Care Reporting System, the Hospital Discharge Abstract Database, the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, the Ontario Mental Health Reporting System, and the Continuing Care Reporting System. Descriptive analysis was used to identify the type and frequency of the adverse events recorded and the consequences of the events. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between the events and their consequences.ResultsThe study found that the incident rate for adverse events for the HC clients included in the cohort was 13%. The most frequent adverse events identified in the databases were injurious falls, injuries from other than a fall, and medication-related incidents. With respect to outcomes, we determined that an injurious fall was associated with a significant increase in the odds of a client requiring long-term-care facility admission and of client death. We further determined that three types of events, delirium, sepsis, and medication-related incidents were associated directly with an increase in the odds of client death.ConclusionsOur study concludes that 13% of clients in homecare experience an adverse event annually. We also determined that an injurious fall was the most frequent of the adverse events and was associated with increased admission to long-term care or death. We recommend the use of tools that are presently available in Canada, such as the Resident Assessment Instrument and its Clinical Assessment Protocols, for assessing and mitigating the risk of an adverse event occurring.

Project description:Introductionβ-Blockers are a heterogenous class of drugs that are no longer recommended for initial antihypertension monotherapy due to unfavorable long-term cardiovascular events observed with non-vasodilatory β-blockers. However, the comparative cardiovascular event risk between the vasodilatory β1-selective antagonist/β3 agonist nebivolol and non-vasodilatory β1-blockers, atenolol and metoprolol, is unknown.MethodsIncident nebivolol, atenolol, or metoprolol monotherapy users with hypertension were identified using US claims data (2007-2014). The first β-blocker claim on/after 1/1/2008 defined the index drug/date. Hypertensive patients without pre-index cardiovascular history were followed until index drug discontinuation (> 90 day supply gap), use of other β-blockers, or end of continuous plan enrollment. Patients were pair-wise propensity score-matched using logistic regression, adjusted for baseline demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, comorbid chronic pulmonary disease, rheumatic disease, renal disease, and diabetes, and use of other antihypertensive drugs during baseline. Time to first hospital claim for a cardiovascular event was assessed via Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for the variables above.ResultsInclusion criteria were met by 81,402 patients (n = 27,134 in each matched treatment cohort), with no between-cohort differences in baseline characteristics, comorbid conditions, or average follow-up duration. Atenolol and metoprolol cohorts had greater risk of hospitalization for a composite event (myocardial infarction, angina, congestive heart failure, stroke) than nebivolol users (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] atenolol: 1.68 [1.29, 2.17]; metoprolol: 2.05 [1.59, 2.63]; P < 0.001, both). Risks of most individual cardiovascular events were also lower with nebivolol, including myocardial infarction and angina versus atenolol, and myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and angina versus metoprolol (P < 0.05, all).ConclusionsNebivolol was associated with significantly lower risk of hospitalization due to composite cardiovascular events than atenolol or metoprolol in this large retrospective cohort study of monotherapy with three different β1-selective blockers in hypertensive patients.FundingAllergan plc, Madison, NJ, USA.

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the risk of cardiovascular events between sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors among people with type 2 diabetes in a real world context of clinical practice.DesignMulti-database retrospective cohort study using a prevalent new user design with subsequent meta-analysis.SettingCanadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), with administrative healthcare databases from seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom, 2013-18.Population209 867 new users of a SGLT2 inhibitor matched to 209 867 users of a DPP-4 inhibitor on time conditional propensity score and followed for a mean of 0.9 years.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes were the individual components of MACE, heart failure, and all cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate site specific adjusted hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals, comparing use of SGLT2 inhibitors with use of DPP-4 inhibitors in an as treated approach. Site specific results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.ResultsCompared with DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with decreased risks of MACE (incidence rate per 1000 person years: 11.4 v 16.5; hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.84), myocardial infarction (5.1 v 6.4; 0.82, 0.70 to 0.96), cardiovascular death (3.9 v 7.7; 0.60, 0.54 to 0.67), heart failure (3.1 v 7.7; 0.43, 0.37 to 0.51), and all cause mortality (8.7 v 17.3; 0.60, 0.54 to 0.67). SGLT2 inhibitors had more modest benefits for ischaemic stroke (2.6 v 3.5; 0.85, 0.72 to 1.01). Similar benefits for MACE were observed with canagliflozin (0.79, 0.66 to 0.94), dapagliflozin (0.73, 0.63 to 0.85), and empagliflozin (0.77, 0.68 to 0.87).ConclusionsIn this large observational study conducted in a real world clinical practice context, the short term use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events compared with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03939624.