Dataset Information

Decreased Visual Function Scores on a Low Luminance Questionnaire Is Associated with Impaired Dark Adaptation.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

We investigate whether responses on a Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) in patients with a range of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) severity are associated with their performance on focal dark adaptation (DA) testing and with choroidal thickness.

Design

Cross-sectional, single-center, observational study.

Participants

A total of 113 participants older than 50 years of age with a range of AMD severity.

Methods

Participants answered the LLQ on the same day they underwent DA testing using a focal dark adaptometer measuring rod intercept time (RIT). We performed univariable and multivariable analyses of the LLQ scores and age, RIT, AMD severity, subfoveal choroidal thickness [SFCT], phakic status, and best-corrected visual acuity.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome of this study was the score on the 32-question LLQ. Each item in the LLQ is designated to 1 of 6 subscales describing functional problems in low luminance: driving, emotional distress, mobility, extreme lighting, peripheral vision, and general dim lighting. Scores were computed for each subscale, in addition to a weighted total mean score.

Results

Responses from 113 participants (mean age, 76.2±9.3 years; 58.4% were female) and 113 study eyes were analyzed. Univariable analysis demonstrated that lower scores on all LLQ subscales were correlated with prolonged DA testing (longer RIT) and decreased choroidal thickness. All associations were statistically significant except for the association of choroidal thickness and "peripheral vision." The strongest association was the LLQ subscale of driving with RIT (r =-0.97, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis for each of the LLQ subscale outcomes, adjusted for age, included RIT, with total LLQ score, "driving," "extreme lighting," and "mobility" also including choroidal thickness. In all multivariable analyses, RIT had a stronger association than choroidal thickness.

Conclusions

This cross-sectional analysis demonstrates associations of patient-reported functional deficits, as assessed on the LLQ, with both reduced DA and reduced choroidal thickness, in a population of older adults with varying degrees of AMD severity and good visual acuity in at least 1 eye. These analyses suggest that local functional measurements of DA testing (RIT) and choroidal thickness are associated with patient-reported functional deficits.

SUBMITTER: Yazdanie M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8279728 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe purpose of this study was to design and evaluate an instrument for assessing vision-related quality of life appropriate for the specific visual impairment characteristic for all stages of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), with a focus on the low luminance deficit in early/intermediate stages.MethodsA standardized questionnaire was developed in three steps with participants with early, intermediate, and late AMD: (1) based on in-depth interviews (n = 19) and two focus group discussions (n = 5 each), content was developed followed by 2. (2) The questionnaire development using cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 3) and leading to a preliminary version of the questionnaire. (3) This version was then administered to 127 participants with early, intermediate, and late AMD. Psychometric properties, such as response category functioning (floor and ceiling effects) and targeting of item difficulty to patient ability of the pilot Vision Impairment in Low Luminance (VILL) questionnaire were evaluated using Rasch analysis.ResultsThe preliminary VILL questionnaire consisted of 68 items with a 5-step response scale. Several items were removed based on floor/ceiling effects or misfit and a final pool of 37 items remained. The response scale was collapsed to four categories as one category was underutilized. The targeting of the instrument was good with minimal difference in person and item means (0.52 logits). Precision was also good with a person separation index of 3.55 and reliability of 0.93. There was evidence of multidimensionality (eigenvalue of the first contrast = 5.95) in the scale, which could be resolved by splitting the items into subscales including a reading, mobility, and emotional well-being subscale.ConclusionsIndividuals with AMD report difficulties with vision-related activities and functioning under visually challenging conditions at all stages of the disease. These aspects were considered when developing the 37-item VILL, which demonstrates promising psychometric characteristics. Further assessments of reliability and validity are warranted.Translational relevanceThe VILL questionnaire is a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure developed for future use in AMD studies.

Project description:PurposeThe impact of cataract surgery on low luminance visual acuity deficit (LLVAD) measurements was investigated by measuring the LLVAD before and after cataract surgery.DesignProspective, longitudinal study.ParticipantsPatients undergoing cataract surgery.MethodsPhotopic luminance (PL)-best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and low luminance (LL)-BCVA were obtained using the ETDRS chart. Low luminance visual acuity deficit scores were calculated by subtracting the LL-BCVA letter score from the PL-BCVA letter score. To demonstrate the reproducibility of these visual acuity measurements, we used data from drusen-only eyes previously published in the Complement Inhibition with Eculizumab for the Treatment of Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration (COMPLETE) study. The PL-BCVA, LL-BCVA, and LLVAD measurements obtained at an interval of 3 months in this cohort were used for comparison. In the current study, the impact of cataract surgery on LLVAD measurements was analyzed by comparing the PL-BCVA, LL-BCVA, and LLVAD measurements before and after cataract surgery.Main outcome measuresThe reproducibility of the visual acuity measurements and the changes in LLVAD measurement after cataract surgery.ResultsIn the COMPLETE study, no clinically significant differences were found in the PL-BCVA, LL-BCVA, or LLVAD measurements between baseline and the 3-month follow-up visits with a change of -1.1 letters, -1.3 letters, and 0.1 letters, respectively (P = 0.02, P = 0.11, and P = 0.88, respectively). In the current study, significant increases were found in the PL-BCVA and LL-BCVA measurements, with a change of 7.3 letters and 10.2 letters after cataract surgery (P < 0.001 for both), and a statistically significant decrease in LLVAD measurements was found, with a change of -3.0 letters after cataract surgery (P = 0.002).ConclusionsBecause of the variable effect of cataracts on LL-BCVA measurements and the significant change in LLVAD measurements after cataract surgery, investigators should be aware that cataract surgery during a trial will have an unpredictable impact on LLVAD measurements, and pseudophakic and phakic patients should be analyzed separately.