Dataset Information

Increased Incidence of In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke During SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: A Single-Center Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Meta-analyses of observational studies report a 1.1-1.7% pooled risk of stroke among patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection requiring hospitalization, but consultations for stroke and reperfusion procedures have decreased during the outbreak that occurred during the first half of the year 2020. It is still unclear whether a true increase in the risk of stroke exists among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In-hospital ischemic stroke (IHIS) complicated the 0.04-0.06% of all admissions in the pre-COVID-19 era, but its incidence has not been assessed among inpatients with COVID-19. We aimed to compare IHIS incidence among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection with that of inpatients with non-COVID-19 illnesses from the same outbreak period and from previous periods.

Methods

This historical cohort study belongs to the COVID-19@Vallecas cohort. The incidence of IHIS was estimated for patients with SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized during March-April 2020 [COVID-19 cohort (CC)], for patients with non-COVID-19 medical illness hospitalized during the same outbreak period [2020 non-COVID-19 cohort (20NCC)], and for inpatients with non-COVID-19 illness admitted during March-April of the years 2016-2019 [historical non-COVID-19 cohort (HNCC)]. Unadjusted risk of IHIS was compared between the three cohorts, and adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of IHIS between cohorts was obtained by means of Poisson regression.

Results

Overall, 8126 inpatients were included in this study. Patients in the CC were younger and more commonly men than those from the HNCC and 20NCC. Absolute risk of IHIS was 0.05% for HNCC, 0.23% for 20NCC, and 0.36% for CC, (p = 0.004 for HNCC vs. CC). Cumulative incidence for IHIS by day nine after admission, with death as a competing risk, was 0.09% for HNCC, 0.23% for 20NCC, and 0.50% for CC. In an adjusted Poisson regression model with sex, age, needing of intensive care unit admission, and cohort (HNCC as reference) as covariates, COVID-19 was an independent predictor for IHIS (IRR 6.76, 95% confidence interval 1.66-27.54, p = 0.01). A nonsignificant increase in the risk of IHIS was observed for the 20NCC (IRR 5.62, 95% confidence interval 0.93-33.9, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was associated with an increase in the incidence of IHIS when compared with inpatients from a historical cohort. Viral infection itself may be related to the increased risk of IHIS among patients with COVID-19, but in view of our results from the 20NCC, it is likely that other factors, such as hospital saturation and overwhelming of health systems, may have played a role in the increased frequency of IHIS.

SUBMITTER: Sierra-Hidalgo F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8281805 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsStroke is the second leading cause of death around the globe. Studies examining the predictors of in-hospital mortality and the impact of complications on early outcome of acute ischemic stroke are scant. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke.MethodsThis was a prospective, single-center study of patients with acute ischemic stroke consecutively admitted to the Neurology Department of a general hospital during a 2-year period (from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011). Prospective data from this single-center study included variables related to sociodemographics, comorbidities, and medical complications, together with in-hospital mortality. Since stroke mortality may impact differently by sex and is also influenced by hospital length of stay, we proceeded to stratify by these variables.ResultsSix-hundred and seventy-three patients were included. Overall, in-hospital mortality rate was 7.13%. Stratifying by length of stay in-hospital (< 7 days and ≥ 7 days), we observed that within the first week, overall mortality was related to a history of previous stroke, higher stroke severity, and to cardiovascular and respiratory complications. After 7 days, the main factor independently associated with overall in-hospital mortality was stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 14, odds ratio (OR): 17.15; 95% CI, 3.06-96.07).Stratifying by sex, we observed that females had a worse outcome if there was a history of prior stroke (OR: 3.29; 95% CI, 1.19-9.10), higher stroke severity (NIHSS ≥ 14, OR: 16.63; 95% CI, 4.66-59.31), and cardiovascular complications (OR: 29.70; 95% CI, 5.70-154.8). Among men, stroke severity (NIHSS ≥ 14, OR: 23.19; 95% CI, 5.69-94.56), respiratory infections (OR: 3.84; 95% CI, 1.32-11.20), and older age had significant negative impact.ConclusionsStroke severity and potentially modifiable complications (respiratory infections and cardiovascular complications) confer an increased risk of in-hospital death in both women and men, particularly during the first week of admission.

Project description:Background and purposeWe determined the association between hospital factors, performance on transient ischemic attack (TIA) process measures, and 90-day ischemic stroke incidence.MethodsLongitudinal analysis of retrospectively obtained data on 9168 veterans ≥18 years with TIA presenting to the emergency department or inpatient unit at 69 Veterans Affairs hospitals with ≥10 eligible patients per year in fiscal years 2015 to 2018. Process measures were high/moderate potency statin within 7 days of discharge, antithrombotic by day 2, and hypertension control (<140/90 mm Hg) at 90 days. The outcome was 90-day stroke incidence.ResultsDuring the 4-year study period, hospitals significantly increased statin use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 1-year increase, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17–1.32]; P<0.001), whereas neither hypertension control (P=0.44) nor antithrombotic use (P=0.82) improved over time. Hospitals that admitted a higher proportion of TIA patients versus emergency department discharge had significantly greater use of statins (aOR per 10-percentage point increase in the proportion of TIA patients admitted, 1.09 [1.03–1.16]; P=0.003) and antithrombotics (aOR per 10-percentage point increase in TIA patients admitted, 1.14 [1.06–1.23]; P<0.001). Hospitals with higher emergency physician staffing and lower TIA patient volume had greater use of antithrombotics (aOR per 1 full-time physician increase, 1.05 [1.01–1.08]; P=0.008 and aOR per 10-patient decrease in volume, 1.09 [1.01–1.16]; P=0.02). Higher emergency physician staffing was associated with lower 90-day stroke incidence (aOR per 1 full-time physician increase, 0.96 [0.92–0.99]; P=0.02) but other hospital factors were not.ConclusionsHospitals admitting higher percentages of TIA patients and having higher emergency physician staffing have greater performance on select guideline-concordant process measures for TIA. Higher emergency physician staffing was associated with improved outcomes 90 days after TIA.