Dataset Information

Gastrointestinal and Nongastrointestinal Complications of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in the Real World: A Nationwide Standard Cohort Using the Common Data Model Database.

ABSTRACT:

Background/aims

The global trend of an expanding aged population has increased concerns about complications correlated with gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy in elderly patients; however, there have been few reports published on this issue.

Methods

In this retrospective, observational cohort study performed between 2012 and 2017, serious complications of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy, and colonoscopic polypectomy were compared between patients according to age (≥65 years vs 18-64 years). We used the Health Insurance Review and Assessment-National Patient Samples database, previously converted to the standardized Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model. Serious complications within 30 days of the procedure included both GI complications (bleeding and perforation) and non-GI complications (cerebrovascular accident [CVA], acute myocardial infarction [AMI], congestive heart failure [CHF], and death).

Results

A total of 387,647 patients who underwent EGD, 241,094 who underwent colonoscopy, and 89,059 who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy were assessed as part of this investigation. During the study period, endoscopic procedures in the older group steadily increased in number in all endoscopy groups (all p<0.001). Further, pooled complication rates of bleeding, CVA, AMI, CHF, and death were approximately three times higher among older patients who underwent EGD or colonoscopy. Moreover, pooled complication rates of CVA, AMI, CHF, and death were approximately 2.2 to 5.0 times higher among older patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy.

Conclusions

Elderly patients experienced approximately three times more GI and non-GI complications after EGD or colonoscopy than young patients. Physicians should pay attention to the potential risks of GI endoscopy in elderly patients.

SUBMITTER: Kim HI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8283291 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Performing colonoscopy within 24 h of presentation to the hospital is the accepted standard of care for patients with an acute lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB). Previous studies have failed to demonstrate the benefit of early colonoscopy (EC) on mortality. In this study, we wanted to see if there was a change in inpatient deaths (primary outcome), length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization charges (TOTCHG) (secondary outcomes) with EC compared to previous studies. Methods Adults diagnosed with LGIB were identified using the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision codes from the National Inpatient Sample database for 2016 to 2019. EC was defined as the procedure performed within 24 h of hospitalization. Delayed colonoscopy (DC) was defined as a procedure performed after 24 h of presentation. The patient population was divided into EC and DC groups, and the effects of several covariates on outcomes were measured using binary logistic and multivariate regression analysis. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to adjust for confounding covariates. Results There were 1,549,065 cases diagnosed with LGIB, of which 285,165 cases (18.4%) received a colonoscopy. A total of 107,045 (6.9%) patients received early colonoscopies. EC was associated with decreased inpatient deaths (0.9% in EC, and 1.4% in DC, P < 0.001). However, upon IPTW, this difference was not present. EC was associated with a decreased LOS (median 3 days vs. 5 days, P < 0.001) and TOTCHG (median $32,037 vs. $44,092, P < 0.001). Weekend admissions (WA) were associated with fewer EC (31.6% in WA, and 39.5% in non-WA, P < 0.001). WA did not affect inpatient deaths. Conclusions EC was not associated with decreased inpatient deaths. There was no difference in endoscopic interventions in both EC and DC groups. The difference in inpatient deaths observed between the two groups was not evident upon adjusting the results for confounders. EC was associated with a decreased LOS, and TOTCHG in patients with LGIB.

Project description:Background Hypertension and diabetes frequently coexist. However, little is known about the interaction between high blood pressure (BP) and hyperglycemia in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and Results We conducted an observational cohort study that included 3 336 363 patients (median age, 43 years old; men, 57.2%). People taking BP- or glucose-lowering medications or those with prior history of CVD were excluded. We defined stage 1 hypertension as having systolic BP of 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic BP of 80 to 89 mm Hg and stage 2 hypertension as having systolic BP of ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP of ≥90 mm Hg. We defined prediabetes as having fasting plasma glucose of 100 to 125 mg/dL and diabetes as having fasting plasma glucose of ≥126 mg/dL. Over a mean follow-up period of 1185 ± 942 days, 5665 myocardial infarction, 52 475 angina pectoris, 25 436 stroke, 54 508 heart failure, and 12 932 atrial fibrillation events occurred. The BP and fasting plasma glucose categories additively increased the risk of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. However, the relative risk of stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension developing into CVD was attenuated with deteriorating glycemic status. Similarly, the relative risk of prediabetes and diabetes developing into CVD was attenuated with increasing BP. For example, the relative risk reduction of stage 2 hypertension for heart failure was 53.5% in individuals with normal fasting plasma glucose, 46.4% in those with prediabetes, and 37.2% in those with diabetes. The robustness of our findings was confirmed using a multitude of sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Although hypertension and hyperglycemia additively increase the risk of developing CVD, the relative contribution of hypertension to the development of CVD decreased with deteriorating glycemic status and that of hyperglycemia was attenuated with increasing BP. Our results indicate a potential interaction between hypertension and hyperglycemia in the development of CVD.