Dataset Information

Outpatient ocular brachytherapy: The USC Experience.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Ocular brachytherapy is a standard-of-care surgical procedure for globe salvage in the treatment of uveal melanoma. The procedure involves the placement and subsequent removal of a radioactive plaque several days later. At many locations, patients are admitted on an inpatient basis until plaque removal due to radiation safety concerns. However, patients may be discharged to home after plaque insertion, and subsequently return to the medical facility for plaque removal. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and systematic financial benefit of the outpatient ocular brachytherapy program at "?>the University of Southern California (USC) Roski Eye Institute for 30 years.

Methods and materials

A single-institution retrospective record review was performed on all 275 patients who underwent brachytherapy for ocular tumors between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 2019 to assess for occurrences of reportable radiation and/or patients safety events. The treatment protocols at our institution are described. Data on hospital-adjusted expenses per inpatient day from the American Hospital Association's 2018 Annual Survey were used as a proxy for costs to patients and the health care system to perform a cost-benefit analysis comparing outpatient versus inpatient brachytherapy.

Results

Of the 275 plaque procedures over a 30-year period that were reviewed, there were no internally or externally reportable patient or radiation safety events. There were no adverse events related to patient transportation to the hospital, the patient not returning for plaque removal, operative issues in removing the plaque on time due to cancelled or delayed cases, or loss of radioactive material. Additionally, our cost-benefit analysis estimates that outpatient brachytherapy reduced costs for USC's patients in 2018 by an average of $24,722 per patient treated with ocular brachytherapy.

Conclusions

With appropriate measures, outpatient ocular brachytherapy allows patients to safely return home with the added benefit of decreased financial burden for both patients and the broader health care system.

SUBMITTER: Joh S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8283325 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:MammoSite balloon brachytherapy is a relatively new technique for partial breast irradiation. The present paper focuses on the treatment planning, dosimetry, and quality assurance aspects of that treatment, based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0413 randomized prospective trial (RTOG 0413) protocol. We investigate the usefulness of evaluating implants for treatment appropriateness according to the full set of RTOG criteria as compared with the manufacturer's guidelines. We describe our methods to improve MammoSite balloon implants that would otherwise not comply with the protocol. The initially acquired computed tomography (CT) images are evaluated for tissue conformance, balloon surface-to-skin distance, and balloon symmetry. If the implant fails to meet the foregoing criteria, corrective action such as delay in the CT scan, balloon manipulation, or fluid volume adjustment is taken, and the patient is re-scanned. If the corrective action appears to be successful, three dimensional treatment planning and dose-volume histogram analysis is performed to evaluate the geometric and dosimetric parameters with regard to the RTOG 0413 protocol. The evaluated parameters include, volume ratio of the lumpectomy cavity to the ipsilateral breast, target volume coverage, tissue-balloon conformance, balloon symmetry, minimal balloon surface-to-skin distance, maximum skin dose, and normal breast tissue dose-volume parameters V150 and V200. Among our implants, 21.7% did not initially meet the RTOG 0413 acceptance criteria. Asymmetry and poor conformance values reduce the target volume coverage, and so an implant with moderate conformance and asymmetry can be within the manufacturer's guidelines, but still not meet the RTOG criteria. Our intervention corrected all but one of the implants that failed to meet the criteria. Manipulating the cavity and adjusting the balloon volume may salvage an implant and meet the strict geometric and dosimetric criteria imposed by the RTOG 0413 protocol.