Dataset Information

Analysis of the elements and metals in multiple generations of electronic cigarette atomizers.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Since their release in 2004, electronic cigarettes (ECs) and their atomizers have undergone significant evolution.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the elemental/metal composition of atomizers in cartomizer and tank style ECs produced over a 5-year period.

Methods

Popular cartomizer and tank models of ECs were dissected and photographed using a stereoscopic microscope, and elemental analysis of EC atomizers was done using scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy.

Results

Eight elements/metals were found in most products across and within brands purchased at different times. These included chromium, nickel, copper, silver, tin, silicon, aluminum, and zinc. Iron and lead were found in some but not all products, while manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, titanium, and tungsten were only found in a few of the products. The metals used in various components were often similar in cartomizer and tank models. Filaments were usually chromium and nickel (nichrome), although in some newer products, the filament also contained iron, copper, and manganese. The thick wire in earlier products was usually copper coated with silver, while in some newer products, the thick wire was predominantly nickel. In all products, the wick was silica, and sheaths, when present, were fiberglass (silicon, oxygen, calcium, aluminum, magnesium). Wire-to-wire joints were either brazed or clamped with brass (copper and zinc), and air-tube-to-thick wire joints, when present, were usually soldered with tin. Tank style products generally lacked a thick wire and sheaths.

Conclusion

In general, atomizer components in ECs were remarkably similar over time and between brands. Certain elements/metals were consistently found in most models from all generations, and these should be studied carefully to determine if their transfer to aerosols affects user's health and if their accumulation in trash affects the environment.

SUBMITTER: Williams M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8283816 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionElectronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is increasing worldwide and is highest among both daily and nondaily smokers. E-cigarettes are perceived as a healthier alternative to combustible tobacco products, but their health risk factors have not yet been established, and one of them is lack of data on aerosol size generated by e-cigarettes.MethodsWe applied a real-time, high-resolution aerosol differential mobility spectrometer to monitor the evolution of aerosol size and concentration during puff development. Particles generated by e-cigarettes were immediately delivered for analysis with minimal dilution and therefore with minimal sample distortion, which is critically important given the highly dynamic aerosol/vapor mixture inherent to e-cigarette emissions.ResultsE-cigarette aerosols normally exhibit a bimodal particle size distribution: nanoparticles (11-25nm count median diameter) and submicron particles (96-175nm count median diameter). Each mode has comparable number concentrations (10(7)-10(8) particles/cm(3)). "Dry puff" tests conducted with no e-cigarette liquid (e-liquid) present in the e-cigarette tank demonstrated that under these conditions only nanoparticles were generated. Analysis of the bulk aerosol collected on the filter showed that e-cigarette emissions contained a variety of metals.ConclusionsE-cigarette aerosol size distribution is different from that of combustible tobacco smoke. E-cigarettes generate high concentrations of nanoparticles and their chemical content requires further investigation. Despite the small mass of nanoparticles, their toxicological impact could be significant. Toxic chemicals that are attached to the small nanoparticles may have greater adverse health effects than when attached to larger submicron particles.ImplicationsThe e-cigarette aerosol size distribution is different from that of combustible tobacco smoke and typically exhibits a bimodal behavior with comparable number concentrations of nanoparticles and submicron particles. While vaping the e-cigarette, along with submicron particles the user is also inhaling nano-aerosol that consists of nanoparticles with attached chemicals that has not been fully investigated. The presence of high concentrations of nanoparticles requires nanotoxicological consideration in order to assess the potential health impact of e-cigarettes. The toxicological impact of inhaled nanoparticles could be significant, though not necessarily similar to the biomarkers typical of combustible tobacco smoke.

Project description:Abstract Introduction Chemical elements and their toxicity were evaluated in electronic cigarette (EC) solvents, fluids, and aerosols. Aims and Methods Element identification and quantification in propylene glycol (PG), glycerin (G), refill fluids before and after use, and aerosols was done using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Cytotoxicity and oxidative stress were evaluated using in vitro assays. Results Seven elements were present in PG, G, and popular refill fluids, and they transferred to aerosols made with ECs. Selenium was in all products (0.125–0.292 mg/L), while arsenic, aluminum, and tin were frequently in solvent and refill fluid samples at lower concentrations. Iron, chromium, copper, nickel, zinc, and lead were only detected in fluid after EC use, indicating they came from heated atomizers. Elements transferred most efficiently to aerosols made with second-/third-generation ECs. Of the elements in fluid, selenium and arsenic were the most cytotoxic to human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) and pulmonary fibroblasts in the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Selenium increased superoxide production in mitochondria and nucleoli and elevated selenoprotein H in nucleoli of BEAS-2B cells at concentrations found in EC aerosols (10 nM or 0.002 mg/L). Conclusions Elements in EC aerosols came from both e-fluids and atomizing units. Within second-/third-generation products, transfer became more efficient as power increased. In vitro responses occurred at concentrations of selenium found in some EC aerosols. Human exposure to chemical elements in ECs could be reduced by regulating (decreasing) allowable EC power and by improving the purity of PG and G. Implications PG, G, refill fluids, and e-fluids contained potentially toxic chemical elements that transferred to aerosols. Transfer was more efficient in second- and third-generation EC products and increased as power increased. Selenium and arsenic were the most cytotoxic of the elements tested in the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Selenium tetrachloride-induced oxidative stress in BEAS-2B cells, but not in human pulmonary fibroblasts. All fluids contained selenium above the concentration that induced oxidative stress in human bronchial epithelial cells. Selenium increased superoxide in mitochondria and nucleoli and increased selenoprotein H, a redox responsive DNA-binding protein that is upregulated by superoxide and an indicator of nucleolar stress. EC users are exposed to elements in aerosols, which may with chronic exposure contribute to diseases associated with oxidative stress.