Dataset Information

A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples.

ABSTRACT: Pseudotime analysis with single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data has been widely used to study dynamic gene regulatory programs along continuous biological processes. While many computational methods have been developed to infer the pseudo-temporal trajectories of cells within a biological sample, methods that compare pseudo-temporal patterns with multiple samples (or replicates) across different experimental conditions are lacking. Lamian is a comprehensive and statistically-rigorous computational framework for differential multi-sample pseudotime analysis. It can be used to identify changes in a biological process associated with sample covariates, such as different biological conditions, and also to detect changes in gene expression, cell density, and topology of a pseudotemporal trajectory. Unlike existing methods that ignore sample variability, Lamian draws statistical inference after accounting for cross-sample variability and hence substantially reduces sample-specific false discoveries that are not generalizable to new samples. Using both simulations and real scRNA-seq data, including an analysis of differential immune response programs between COVID-19 patients with different disease severity levels, we demonstrate the advantages of Lamian in decoding cellular gene expression programs in continuous biological processes.

SUBMITTER: Hou W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8288148 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples.

Hou Wenpin W Ji Zhicheng Z Chen Zeyu Z Wherry E John EJ Hicks Stephanie C SC Ji Hongkai H

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 20210712

Pseudotime analysis with single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data has been widely used to study dynamic gene regulatory programs along continuous biological processes. While many computational methods have been developed to infer the pseudo-temporal trajectories of cells within a biological sample, methods that compare pseudo-temporal patterns with multiple samples (or replicates) across different experimental conditions are lacking. Lamian is a comprehensive and statistically-rigorous comput ...[more]

PMID: 34282418

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSingle-cell RNA Sequencing is gaining popularity in recent years. Compared to bulk RNA-Seq, single-cell RNA Sequencing allows the gene expression being measured within individual cells instead of mean gene expression levels across all cells in the sample. Thus, cell-to-cell variation of gene expressions could be examined. Gene differential expression analysis remains the major purpose in most single-cell RNA sequencing experiments and many methods have been developed in recent years to conduct gene differential expression analysis for single-cell RNA sequencing data.ResultsThrough simulation studies and real data examples, we evaluated the performance of five open-source popular methods used for gene differential expression analysis in single-cell RNA sequencing data. The five methods included DEsingle (Zero-inflated negative binomial model), Linnorm (Empirical Bayes method on transformed count data using the limma package), monocle (An approximate Chi-Square likelihood ratio test), MAST (A generalized linear hurdle model), and DESeq2 (A generalized linear model with empirical Bayes approach and also commonly used for bulk RNA sequencing differential express analyses). We assessed the false discovery rate (FDR) control, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve for all five methods under different sample sizes, distribution assumptions, and proportions of zeros in the data.ConclusionsWe found the MAST method performed the best among the five methods compared with the largest AUROC values across all tested sample sizes and different proportion of truly differential expressed genes, when the data followed negative binomial distributions. When the sample size increased to 100 in each group, the MAST method showed the best performance with the highest AUROC regardless of the data distributions. If the excess zeros were first filtered out before the gene differential analyses, the DESingle, Linnorm, and DESeq2 performed relatively better than the MAST and the monocle methods with higher AUROC values.

Dataset Information

A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples.

Publications

A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets