Dataset Information

Effectiveness of 'Mois sans tabac 2016': A French social marketing campaign against smoking.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

In October 2016, the first edition of Mois sans tabac (Tobacco-Free Month) was launched, a campaign which had invited French smokers to challenge themselves to quit smoking for the whole month of November. We aimed to study the effectiveness of this social marketing intervention on quit attempts (QA) in the general French population, and to study possible differences according to sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods

This study used data from the 2017 Health Barometer survey, a random survey conducted by telephone on 25319 individuals. It included 6341 respondents who reported that they were daily smokers when the Mois sans tabac campaign was launched in 2016. The association between self-declared exposure to the campaign and making a QA has been studied using multivariate logistic regressions.

Results

Exposure to the 2016 Mois sans tabac campaign is associated with a QA lasting at least 24 hours in the final quarter of 2016 (AOR=1.32; 95% CI: 1.07- 1.63, p<0.01), with a QA lasting at least 30 days (AOR=1.95; 95% CI: 1.31-2.91, p<0.001), and being abstinent at the time of the interview in 2017 (AOR=2.39; 95% CI: 1.37-4.15, p<0.01). A dose-effect relationship is observed between the frequency of exposure to the campaign and QA, which is mostly explained by the number of sources of exposure (television, radio, posters, the press, the internet and social networks). Although certain priority groups (e.g. manual workers, the unemployed) had poorer recall of the campaign than other groups, the impact of self-reported exposure to the campaign on QA in unemployed people or those with less than high school educational level appears to have been greater.

Conclusions

These analyses suggest the effectiveness of the 2016 Mois sans tabac intervention, in a context of strengthening public tobacco control policies in France, which may have contributed to the drop in smoking observed between 2016 and 2019.

SUBMITTER: Guignard R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8288465 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSocial marketing campaigns offer a promising approach to the prevention of childhood obesity. Change4Life (C4L) is a national obesity prevention campaign in England. It included mass media coverage aiming to reframe obesity into a health issue relevant to all and provided the opportunity for parents to complete a brief questionnaire ('How are the Kids') and receive personalised feedback about their children's eating and activity. Print and online C4L resources were available with guidance about healthy eating and physical activity. The study aims were to examine the impact of personalised feedback and print material from the C4L campaign on parents' attitudes and behaviours about their children's eating and activity in a community-based cluster-randomised controlled trial.MethodsParents of 5-11?year old children were recruited from 40 primary schools across England. Schools were randomised to intervention or control ('usual care'). Basic demographic data and brief information about their attitudes to their children's health were collected. Families in intervention schools were mailed the C4L print materials and the 'How are the Kids' questionnaire; those returning the questionnaire were sent personalised feedback and others received generic materials. Outcomes included awareness of C4L, attitudes to the behaviours recommended in C4L, parenting behaviours (monitoring and modelling), and child health behaviours (diet, physical activity and television viewing). Follow-up data were collected from parents by postal questionnaire after six months. Qualitative interviews were carried out with a subset of parents (n?=?12).Results3,774 families completed baseline questionnaires and follow-up data were obtained from 1,419 families (37.6%). Awareness was high in both groups at baseline (75%), but increased significantly in the intervention group by follow-up (96% vs. 87%). Few parents (5.2% of the intervention group) returned the questionnaire to get personalised feedback. There were few significant group differences in parental attitudes or parenting and child health behaviours at follow-up. Physical activity was rated as less important in the intervention group, but a significant group-by-socioeconomic status (SES) interaction indicated that this effect was confined to higher SES families. Similar interactions were also seen for physical activity monitoring and child television time; with adverse effects in higher SES families and no change in the lower SES families. Effects were little better in families that completed the questionnaire and received personalised feedback. At interview, acceptability of the intervention was modest, although higher in lower SES families.ConclusionsThe C4L campaign materials achieved increases in awareness of the campaign, but in this sample had little impact on attitudes or behaviour. Low engagement with the intervention appeared a key issue.Trial registration numberCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN00791709.