Dataset Information

Social inequalities in the surrounding areas of food deserts and food swamps in a Brazilian metropolis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Food deserts are neighborhoods with little or no access to healthy food, whereas food swamps are neighborhoods where unhealthy food options prevail over healthy ones. The main aims of the current study are to feature and compare the neighborhoods of food deserts and food swamps based on social inequality.

Methods

Ecological study carried out in Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Information about commercial food establishments derived from two different databases. It was measured by secondary governmental databases, which were virtually conferred in the present study. Census tracts were considered as analysis units and classified as food deserts and food swamps, based on the Brazilian methodology. Take into consideration the density of establishments classified as selling fresh or minimally-processed food, mixed establishments, and establishments selling ultra-processed food. The Brazilian methodology evaluates food deserts by the density of healthy establishments (establishments classified as mostly selling fresh or minimally-processed food and mixed establishments) per 10 thousand inhabitants. And the metric to evaluate food swamps considers the density of unhealthy establishments (establishments mostly selling ultra-processed food) per 10 thousand inhabitants. Information about social inequalities comprised aspects such as income, population count, number of households, number of literate individuals, race, water and energy supply, and garbage collection. The Health Vulnerability Index (HVI) was used as a synthetic social vulnerability indicator.

Results

Neighborhoods of food deserts presented worse essential service availability, lower income per capita, and smaller mean number of literate individuals. Census tracts classified as food swamps presented better socio-demographic conditions than those areas food deserts. Neighborhoods simultaneously classified as food deserts and food swamps presented lower income per capita and were more often observed in census sectors presenting medium and high HVI.

Conclusion

The food environment in Belo Horizonte was featured by the strong presence of food deserts and food swamps. However, the potential influence of these areas on food intake has changed depending on social inequalities.

SUBMITTER: Honorio OS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8293554 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceObesity-related cancers account for 40% of all cancers in the US. Healthy food consumption is a modifiable factor shown to reduce obesity-related cancer mortality, but residing in areas with less access to grocery stores (food deserts) or higher access to fast food (food swamps) reduces healthy food access and has been understudied.ObjectiveTo analyze the association of food deserts and food swamps with obesity-related cancer mortality in the US.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional ecologic study used US Department of Agriculture Food Environment Atlas data from 2012, 2014, 2015, 2017, and 2020 and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mortality data from 2010 to 2020. A total of 3038 US counties or county equivalents with complete information on food environment scores and obesity-related cancer mortality data were included. An age-adjusted, generalized, mixed-effects regression model was performed for the association of food desert and food swamp scores with obesity-related cancer mortality rates. Data were analyzed from September 9, 2022, to September 30, 2022.ExposuresFood swamp score was calculated as the ratio of fast-food and convenience stores to grocery stores and farmers markets. Higher food swamp and food desert scores (20.0 to ≥58.0) indicated counties with fewer healthy food resources.Main outcomes and measuresObesity-related cancer (based on the International Agency for Research on Cancer evidence between obesity and 13 types of cancer) mortality rates were categorized as high (≥71.8 per 100 000 population) vs low (<71.8 per 100 000 population) per county.ResultsA total of 3038 counties or county equivalents with high obesity-related cancer mortality rates had a higher percentage of non-Hispanic Black residents (3.26% [IQR, 0.47%-26.35%] vs 1.77% [IQR, 0.43%-8.48%]), higher percentage of persons older than 65 years (15.71% [IQR, 13.73%-18.00%] vs 15.40% [IQR, 12.82%-18.09%]), higher poverty rates (19.00% [IQR, 14.20%-23.70%] vs 14.40% [IQR, 11.00%-18.50%]), higher adult obesity rates (33.00% [IQR, 32.00%-35.00%] vs 32.10% [IQR, 29.30%-33.20%]), and higher adult diabetes rates (12.50% [IQR, 11.00%-14.20%] vs 10.70% [IQR, 9.30%-12.40%]) compared with counties or county equivalents with low obesity-related cancer mortality. There was a 77% increased odds of having high obesity-related cancer mortality rates among US counties or county equivalents with high food swamp scores (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.43-2.19). A positive dose-response relationship among 3 levels of food desert and food swamp scores and obesity-related cancer mortality was also observed.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this cross-sectional ecologic study suggest that policy makers, funding agencies, and community stakeholders should implement sustainable approaches to combating obesity and cancer and establishing access to healthier food, such as creating more walkable neighborhoods and community gardens.