Project description:Sternal closure after median sternotomy traditionally uses a stainless steel wire cerclage. Sternal wires are placed through or around the sternum, and the wire ends are twisted together to bring the sternum back together. Complications of this technique include sternal instability, dehiscence, non-union, and increased pain. Compared to traditional wire cerclage, the Figure 8 FlatWire Sternal Closure System has been demonstrated to be stronger and significantly reduce sternal cut-through and postoperative pain. There was no significant difference in hospital length of stay or mean hospitalization cost. Operative time was slightly longer in the FlatWire group, but this difference has been attributed to the learning curve of mastering the FlatWire technique. This article and supplemental video will demonstrate the technique of FlatWire Sternal Closure System. Briefly, the FlatWire is placed around the sternum, and the FlatWire end is fed through the security box. Once all of the wires are placed, the Figure 8 tensioning device is used to tighten each wire through the security box to the appropriate tensile force. Next, the FlatWires are rotated 90 degrees to hold the sternal position temporarily. Once sternal approximation is achieved, each FlatWire is twisted 120 degrees, and any excess length of the FlatWire is clipped.
Project description:Patients with continuous flow ventricular assist devices (CF-VAD's) in the systemic ventricle (left ventricle or single ventricle) often have no palpable pulses, unreliable pulse oximetry waveforms and non-pulsatile arterial waveforms despite hemodynamic stability. When circulatory decompensation occurs, standard indicators to begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) which are used in other pediatric patients (i.e., significant bradycardia or loss of pulse) cannot be applied in the same fashion. In this population, there may already be pulselessness and development of bradycardia in and of itself would not trigger chest compressions. There are no universal guidelines to dictate when to consider chest compressions in this population. As such, there may be a delay in decision-making or in recognizing the need for chest compressions, even in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU) and cared for by experienced staff who perform CPR regularly. We present four examples of pediatric cardiac ICU patients from a single center who underwent CPR between 2018 and 2019. Based on this case series, we propose a decision-making algorithm for chest compressions in pediatric patients with CF-VADs in the systemic ventricle.
Project description:PurposeThermoreactive nitinol Flexigrip has been developed to ensure better fixation than conventional wire closure. To verify the advantage of Flexigrip over the conventional wiring, we compared early sternal bone healing on computed tomography (CT).MethodsA prospective cohort study enrolled the first consecutive 80 patients with wiring and the second consecutive 44 patients undergoing Flexigrip sternal closure. The primary endpoint was sternal healing evaluated quantitatively using a 6-point scale and measured gaps/offsets of the sternal halves at 6 levels on CT scans on the 14th postoperative day. Secondary endpoints included pain scores and sternal complications 1 month after surgery.ResultsCompared with the patients of wiring, those who received Flexigrips showed higher 6-point scores at most sternum levels, less frequent gaps (52% vs 70%, p = 0.04), lower offsets (3.3 ± 0.9 mm vs 4.3 ± 0.7 mm, p <0.001) at the manubrium, and less frequent gaps (25% vs 43%, p = 0.04) and offsets (2.3% vs 24%, p = 0.002) at the middle of sternum. The pain scores and sternal complication rates were similar between both groups.ConclusionCT evaluation 2 weeks after surgery revealed that Flexigrip sternal closure showed less gaps and offsets of the sternal halves, suggesting faster sternal bone union when compared to the wiring.
Project description:ObjectivesOsteosynthetic closure of the chest after median sternotomy is usually performed with steel wires. We describe, for the first time, a case series in which titanium hooks were implanted from the sternal surface in patients who required secondary or additional stabilization. In comparison to the classic wires, the diameters of the hooks are approximately three times bigger and therefore reduce the risk of cutting through the bones. Additionally, there is no need to dissect retrosternal adhesions, which may reduce the risk of injuring mediastinal tissues.MethodsThe hooks are shaped like fishing hooks and can be inserted parasternally into the intercostal spaces. They can be pulled to the contralateral side of the sternum by the attached wires and then intertwined with a second hook.ResultsIn 13 patients, the system was used to provide additional stabilization, while in two patients the hooks were implanted for exclusive stabilization of sternal fractures. In all cases but one, the implantation was able to eliminate the sternal problems. No infections, necrosis or bleeding of neighbouring tissues occurred. One patient developed chronic sternal infection, which necessitated explantation of the hooks.ConclusionsThis sternal closure system using titanium hooks inserted parasternally is an effective alternative to conventional techniques and may increase stability of the breastbone and reduce the risk of injury to retrosternal tissues.
Project description:Chest wall tumours are heterogeneous neoplasms, either primary or metastatic, with a malignancy rate of 50%. Surgical resection is one of the mainstays of the treatment, however, chest wall resections can be particularly challenging depending onto the resection size, site and patient habitus. The surgical strategy should be carefully analysed preoperatively, keeping in mind the need of an oncological radical resection (R0) in accordance to the reconstruction principles elicited by le Roux and Sherma since 1983, which include restoring the chest wall rigidity, preserving pulmonary mechanics, protect the intrathoracic organs, avoiding paradox movements of the chest cavity and, possibly, to reduce the thoracic deformity. In this context, we herewith report our surgical reconstruction technique following an anterior chest wall resection and sternal body wedge for a primary chest wall tumour (chondrosarcoma).
Project description:BackgroundRecent studies describe an emerging role for percutaneous left ventricular assist devices such as Impella CP® as rescue therapy for refractory cardiac arrest. We hypothesized that the addition of mechanical chest compressions to percutaneous left ventricular assist device assisted CPR would improve hemodynamics by compressing the right ventricle and augmenting pulmonary blood flow and left ventricular filling. We performed a pilot study to test this hypothesis using a swine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.MethodsEight Yorkshire swine were anesthetized, intubated, and instrumented for hemodynamic monitoring. They were subjected to untreated ventricular fibrillation for 5.75 (SD 2.90) minutes followed by mechanical chest compressions for a mean of 20.0 (SD 5.0) minutes before initiation of percutaneous left ventricular assist device. After percutaneous left ventricular assist device initiation, mechanical chest compressions was stopped (n = 4) or continued (n = 4). Defibrillation was attempted 4, 8 and 12 minutes after initiating percutaneous left ventricular assist device circulatory support.ResultsThe percutaneous left ventricular assist device + mechanical chest compressions group had significantly higher percutaneous left ventricular assist device flow prior to return of spontaneous heartbeat at four- and twelve-minutes after percutaneous left ventricular assist device initiation, and significantly higher end tidal CO2 at 4-minutes after percutaneous left ventricular assist device initiation, when compared with the percutaneous left ventricular assist device alone group. Carotid artery flow was not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionThe addition of mechanical chest compressions to percutaneous left ventricular assist device support during cardiac arrest may generate higher percutaneous left ventricular assist device and carotid artery flow prior to return of spontaneous heartbeat compared to percutaneous left ventricular assist device alone. Further studies are needed to determine if this approach improves other hemodynamic parameters or outcomes after prolonged cardiac arrest.
Project description:BackgroundLeft ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival in patients with end-stage heart failure but are associated with ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The impact of LVAD-associated stroke on transplant candidacy and outcomes has not been characterized.MethodsAdult patients undergoing LVAD implantation at Cleveland Clinic between 2004 to 2021 were reviewed and patients who developed ischemic stroke or ICH were identified. Post-transplant survival analysis was performed between patients with LVAD-associated stroke vs. without.Results917 patients had an LVAD implantation of whom 244 (median age 57, 79% male) underwent subsequent transplant including 25 with prior LVAD-associated stroke. The 1- and 2-year survival after transplant in patients with LVAD-associated stroke were 100% and 95% respectively, compared with 92% and 90% in patients without stroke (p=0.156; p=0.323) Similarly, there was no difference in stroke incidence at 1- and 2 years after transplant between patients with LVAD-associated stroke (4% and 5%) and those without prior stroke (5% and 6%, p = 0.884; p=0.744).ConclusionsIn this single-center retrospective study, patients with LVAD-associated stroke were significantly less likely to undergo heart transplant, but those who underwent heart transplant had similar post-transplant outcomes as patients without history of LVAD-associated stroke. Given the similar outcomes seen in this population, history of LVAD-associated stroke should not be viewed as an absolute contraindication to subsequent heart transplant.
Project description:BackgroundAllogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells (MPCs) injected during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may contribute to myocardial recovery. This trial explores the safety and efficacy of this strategy.Methods and resultsIn this multicenter, double-blind, sham-procedure controlled trial, 30 patients were randomized (2:1) to intramyocardial injection of 25 million MPCs or medium during LVAD implantation. The primary safety end point was incidence of infectious myocarditis, myocardial rupture, neoplasm, hypersensitivity reaction, and immune sensitization (90 days after randomization). Key efficacy end points were functional status and ventricular function while temporarily weaned from LVAD support (90 days after randomization). Patients were followed up until transplant or 12 months after randomization, whichever came first. Mean age was 57.4 (±13.6) years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 18.1%, and 66.7% were destination therapy LVADs. No safety events were observed. Successful temporary LVAD weaning was achieved in 50% of MPC and 20% of control patients at 90 days (P=0.24); the posterior probability that MPCs increased the likelihood of successful weaning was 93%. At 90 days, 3 deaths (30%) occurred in control patients, and none occurred in MPC patients. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction after successful wean was 24.0% (MPC=10) and 22.5% (control=2; P=0.56). At 12 months, 30% of MPC patients and 40% of control patients were successfully temporarily weaned from LVAD support (P=0.69), and 6 deaths (30%) occurred in MPC patients. Donor-specific HLA sensitization developed in 2 MPC and 3 control patients and resolved by 12 months.ConclusionsIn this preliminary trial, administration of MPCs appeared to be safe, and there was a potential signal of efficacy. Future studies will evaluate the potential for higher or additional doses to enhance the ability to wean LVAD recipients off support.Clinical trial registration urlhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01442129.
Project description:The topic of this article, stated a more familiar way, is whether left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are ready for 'Primetime' as a therapeutic option in and of themselves. In order to provide an update and insight on this question, we briefly review from where the field has come, and in more detail describe its current state and where we are heading. We believe the short answer to this question is 'Yes', but like many things, a short answer is not adequate. Here we attempt to deliver a more comprehensive answer, providing some historical context, outlining the great achievements that have been made, as well as the many challenges that still remain before LVADs become a truly mainstream therapy.