Technical aspects of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve resections: Where are the limits?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Gonzalez-Rivas D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8298887 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Pathology arising from the intrathoracic portion of the trachea (distal trachea), the carina and the main bronchi is usually neoplastic and is mainly treated with surgery. Resection of the intrathoracic portion of the trachea, the carina and the main bronchi for neoplastic lesions does not necessitate lung resection and is traditionally being conducted via open surgery. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is witnessing an exponential growth and is the treatment of choice for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The experience accumulated over the past two decades along with the introduction of reliable and ergonomic technology, has led to the expansion of its indications. In this article we provide a detailed description of lung sparing distal tracheal, carinal and main bronchi resection for primary neoplasms of the airway, without involvement of the lung, with the uniportal video-assisted technique. The chest is entered through the fourth intercostal space, mid-axillary line. Dissection of the paratracheal space anteriorly, the tracheoesophageal groove posteriorly and the subcarinal space and division of the azygos arch are essential to mobilize the distal trachea and carina. Lateral dissection should be avoided beyond the points of division of the airway, as it may hinder the blood supply to the anastomosis. Any tension to the anastomosis should be relieved by release maneuvers. Ventilation is achieved through an endobronchial catheter, inserted into the left main bronchus through which a high-frequency jet ventilation catheter can be also inserted through it. The rationale of applying a minimally invasive technique for the conduction of tracheal and carinal resections, is to exploit its advantages, namely less pain, earlier mobilization and lower morbidity. Uniportal video-assisted resections of the distal trachea, carina and the main bronchi, are safe when conducted by experienced surgical and anesthetic teams.
| S-EPMC7656374 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Endobronchial tumours requiring sleeve resection have been usually considered a contraindication for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, with new technical advances and the experience gained in VATS, sleeve lobectomy has been performed by thoracoscopy in experienced VATS centres. Right-sided sleeve anastomoses are easier to perform by VATS than left-sided ones because of the presence of the pulmonary artery and aortic arch on the left side. Most surgeons use a 3 to 4 incision VATS technique for sleeve anastomosis but the surgery can be performed by using only one incision. This is the first report of a left-sided sleeve lobectomy by uniportal approach.
| S-EPMC3895057 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The bronchial carcinoid (BC) tumor is a neuroendocrine lung tumor that accounts for 1-2% of all lung neoplasia occurrences. However, BC tumors remain rare in the literature. Nowadays, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery VATS can be safely performed with an excellent clinical outcome. The typical procedure involves three incisions. We assume that performing the same procedures with a single utility incision is possible. This report describes our experience performing sleeve bilobectomy for a neglected carcinoid tumor using a uniportal VATS without spreading of ribs.
| S-EPMC8851288 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The management of hemothorax (spontaneous or, more often, due to thoracic trauma lesions), follows basic tenets well-respected by cardiothoracic surgeons. In most, a non-operative approach is adequate and safe, with a defined group of patients requiring only tube thoracostomy. Only a minority of patients need a surgical intervention due to retained hemothorax, persistent bleeding or incoming complications, as pleural empyema or entrapped lung. In the early 1990s, the rapid technological developments determined an increase of diagnostic and therapeutical indications for multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) as the gold standard therapy for retained and persistent hemothorax, allowing an earlier diagnosis, total clots removal and better tubes placement with less morbidity, reduced post-operative pain and shorter hospital stay. There is no consensus in the literature regarding the timing for draining hemothorax, but best results are obtained when the drainage is performed within the first 5 days after the onset. The traditional multi-port approach has evolved in the last years into an uniportal approach that mimics open surgical vantage points utilizing a non-rib-spreading single small incision. Currently, in experienced hands, this technique is used for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions as hemothorax evacuation as like as the more complex procedures, such as lobectomies or bronchial sleeve and vascular reconstructions.
| S-EPMC5639032 | biostudies-literature
Project description:With the evolution of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), the technological aids have come to help skill surgeons to improve the results in thoracic surgery and feasible to perform a complex surgery. The technological aids are divided into three important groups, which make surgical steps easy to perform, besides reducing surgical time and surgical accidents in the hands of experienced surgeons. The groups are: (I) conventional thoracoscopic instruments; (II) sealing devices using in uniportal VATS; (III) high definition cameras, robotic arms prototype and the future robotic aids for uniportal VATS surgery. Uniportal VATS is an example of the continuing search for methods that aim to provide the patient a surgical cure of the disease with the lowest morbidity. That is the reason companies are creating more and new technologies, but the surgeon have to choose properly and to know how, when and where is the moment to use each new aids to avoid mistakes. The future of the thoracic surgery is based on evolution of surgical procedures and innovations to try to reduce even more the surgical and anesthetic trauma. This article summarizes the technological aids to improve and help a thoracoscopics surgeons perform a uniportal VATS feasible and safe.
| S-EPMC5638310 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Intubated general anesthesia with one-lung ventilation was traditionally considered necessary for thoracoscopic major pulmonary resections. However, non-intubated thoracoscopic lobectomy can be performed by using conventional and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). These non-intubated procedures try to minimize the adverse effects of tracheal intubation and general anesthesia but these procedures must only be performed by experienced anesthesiologists and skilled thoracoscopic surgeons. Here we present a video of a uniportal VATS left upper lobectomy in a non-intubated patient, maintaining the spontaneous ventilation.
| S-EPMC4387442 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundAnatomical segmentectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) is a delicate surgical procedure. Hitherto, only few studies have assessed the learning curves of anatomical segmentectomy by U-VATS, with varying data available. The present study aimed to investigate the learning curve and clinical advantages for U-VATS segmentectomy.MethodsThe medical records of patients who underwent U-VATS or non-U-VATS segmentectomy between August 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was employed to illustrate the learning curve of U-VATS segmentectomy. Perioperative parameters were used to determine the structural intervals of the learning curve, and to compare U-VATS and non-U-VATS segmentectomy.ResultsIn total, 122 patients receiving U-VATS segmentectomy and 98 patients receiving non-VATS segmentectomy were included. Of these, 116 patients underwent successful U-VATS segmentectomy, while the other six patients underwent conversions. The structural intervals of 20-29 cases and 58-63 cases were determined as the threshold according to the CUSUM analyses. The learning process of U-VATS segmentectomy was therefore divided into three phases. Interestingly, the perioperative parameters differed significantly between Phases 1 and 3, including operative time (Op-T), postoperative hospital stays (Po-Hst), postoperative thoracic drainage (Po-D), and operative failure (Po-F) rates (P<0.05). Moreover, U-VATS segmentectomy in Phase 3 was associated with significantly shorter Po-Hst and Op-T, less Po-D, and reduced postoperative pain compared with non-U-VATS (P<0.05).ConclusionsU-VATS segmentectomy is an ideal alternative to non-U-VATS segmentectomy. Surgeons can preliminarily complete U-VATS anatomical segmentectomy after performing 20-29 cases, and can master the surgical techniques after completing 58-63 cases.
| S-EPMC8825550 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In conventional multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, devices such as cotton-tipped applicators are used instead of graspers to avoid injuring the fragile lung tissue while stabilizing the lung and securing the surgical visual field. However, in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, which requires the simultaneous use of multiple instruments, the instruments tend to interfere with each other during the procedure because they share a single incisional port. Here, we describe a simple, easy and cost-effective lung retraction technique using cotton swabs to solve the problem. We present this technique and comment on its advantages, including decreased cost and improved surgical visualization.
| S-EPMC8560209 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn recent years, opportunities to conduct anatomical segmentectomies for early stage lung cancer, metastatic lung tumor, and so on have been increasing. Generally, uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) uncommon segmentectomy is technically more complicated because of limited angulation compared to multiportal VATS (M-VATS) and the need to treat peripheral vessels/bronchi compared to common segmentectomy. This study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of U-VATS uncommon segmentectomy compared with U-VATS common segmentectomy and M-VATS uncommon segmentectomy.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 76 patients in the M-VATS group and 45 patients in the U-VATS group who underwent VATS segmentectomy from January 2015 to December 2020. During that period, the perioperative results of U-VATS uncommon (n=22) segmentectomy were compared with those of U-VATS common (n=23) and M-VATS uncommon (n=37) segmentectomy. Uncommon segmentectomy was defined as any segmentectomy other than segmentectomies of the lingual, basilar, or superior segment of the lower lobe (S6), and upper division of the left upper lobe. All patients in our department underwent preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) angiography and bronchography to image bronchovascular structures and determine the resection line.ResultsPatients characteristics were similar between the U-VATS uncommon segmentectomy group and the U-VATS common segmentectomy group or the M-VATS uncommon segmentectomy group. In U-VATS, there were no significant differences between common and uncommon segmentectomy in operation time, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative complications. Comparing M-VATS and U-VATS uncommon segmentectomies, operation time (145±35 vs. 185±44 min, P<0.001) and postoperative hospitalization (3.1±1.6 vs. 4.2±1.8 days, P=0.02) were significantly shorter in the U-VATS group than in the M-VATS group. There were no significant differences in blood loss, intraoperative bleeding, duration of postoperative drainage and postoperative complications.ConclusionsIn U-VATS, both types of segmentectomies can be achieved with similar results. Moreover, U-VATS shortened operation time and postoperative hospitalization in uncommon segmentectomy compared with conventional M-VATS. U-VATS is a useful approach for uncommon segmentectomy.
| S-EPMC8182544 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Video 1Incision and port placement of 4 to 5 cm at the fifth or sixth intercostal space between the anterior and the midaxillary line. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.Video 2Dissection of the anterior mediastinal pleura and division of the superior pulmonary vein. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.Video 3Dissection of the apical mediastinal pleura and division of the anterior and apical branches of the pulmonary artery. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.Video 4Dissection and division of the anterior oblique fissure and division of the lingular branches of the pulmonary artery. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.Video 5Dissection and division of the interlobar fissure and the posterior branch of the pulmonary artery. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.Video 6Dissection and division of the left upper lobe bronchus. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.Video 7Lymph node dissection (subaortic, hilar, subcarinal, or inferior pulmonary ligament) and division of the inferior pulmonary ligament. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.Video 8Specimen retrieval. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.Video 9Chest tube placement. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00717-3/fulltext.
| S-EPMC8691926 | biostudies-literature