Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A Rare Case of Epicardial Lead Strangulation of Left Ventricular Inflow.

ABSTRACT: This is an unusual case of left atrioventricular groove strangulation by an abandoned epicardial pacing lead associated with mild left ventricular inflow obstruction, left atrial enlargement, and new atrial tachycardia that resolved with surgical lead removal. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

SUBMITTER: Samayoa JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8302054 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

A Rare Case of Epicardial Lead Strangulation of Left Ventricular Inflow.

Samayoa Juan C JC Etheridge Susan P SP Williams Richard V RV

JACC. Case reports 20200520 5

This is an unusual case of left atrioventricular groove strangulation by an abandoned epicardial pacing lead associated with mild left ventricular inflow obstruction, left atrial enlargement, and new atrial tachycardia that resolved with surgical lead removal. (<b>Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.</b>). ...[more]

PMID: 34317360

Similar Datasets

Cardiac strangulation with chronic ab-extrinseco occlusion of the left-circumflex artery from an epicardial lead: a case report.

Project description:BackgroundCardiac strangulation (CS) from epicardial pacing leads (EPLs) is a rare and potentially lethal mechanical complication associated with epicardial pacemaker (PM) implantation.Case summaryWe report a case of a 44-year-old-female patient presenting with chest and left shoulder pain in the absence of reported trauma with history of congenital atrioventricular block treated with epicardial PM implantation during the childhood and subsequent transvenous reimplantation over the years. Troponin I resulted within normal values and ECG, transthoracic echocardiography and chest X-ray documented no acute cardiopulmonary findings. After 3 months the patient underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) documenting the presence of solid and focally calcified tissue grown along the course of the EPLs, determining multiple focal impressions on the left ventricular epicardial edge and a segmental occlusion of the middle left-circumflex artery (LCX) due to ab-extrinseco compression. After 10 days, the patient was admitted at the emergency department with atypical chest pain and underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA), which confirmed chronic occlusion of the mid-LCX with complete collateral circulation; a stress echocardiography ruled out myocardial ischaemia and the patient was uneventfully discharged.DiscussionThe diagnosis of CS in patients with epicardial PM leads remains challenging, especially in adults with atypical clinical presentation; thus, any clinical or instrumental clue should prompt further higher-level imaging investigations, such as CCTA or ICA. It is also important to disclose that sometimes CS can be only a collateral finding with no relationship with the patient's symptoms.

| S-EPMC11737912 | biostudies-literature

Epicardial echocardiography for left ventricular epicardial lead placement during cardiac resynchronization.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8191273 | biostudies-literature

Thoracoscopic Implantation of Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Project description:(1) Background: Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of epicardial left ventricular (LV) lead placement using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). (2) Methods: Acute and post-discharge outcomes of CRT were compared between patients with epicardial LV leads (Epicardial-LV group, n = 13) and those with endocardial LV leads (Endocardial-LV group, n = 243). (3) Results: Epicardial LV leads were implanted via VATS alone (n = 8) or along with mini-thoracotomy (n = 5), for failed endocardial implantation (n = 11) or recurrent lead dislodgement (n = 2). All epicardial procedures under general anesthesia with one-lung ventilation were successfully completed in 1.0 ± 0.4 h without phrenic nerve stimulation. LV pacing thresholds in the epicardial-LV (1.5 ± 1.0 V) and endocardial-LV (1.3 ± 0.8 V) were comparable (p = 0.651). All patients were discharged alive post-VATS 8.8 ± 3.9 days. During the follow-up (34.3 ± 28.6 months), all patients with epicardial LV leads stayed alive except for one cardiac death post-CRT 14 months and one heart transplantation post-CRT 30 months. All epicardial LV leads maintained stable performance without dislodgement/significant changes in pacing threshold/impedance. LV lead dislodgement occurred only in endocardial-LV (7/243, 2.9%). Efficacy in both groups was comparable in terms of QRS narrowing, increase in LV ejection fraction, and survival free of cardiac death, or heart-failure-related hospitalization. (4) Conclusions: Epicardial LV lead placement using VATS can be a safe and effective alternative to endocardial implantation, with comparable acute and post-discharge outcomes achieved by both approaches.

| S-EPMC9145737 | biostudies-literature

Left atrial undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma causing left ventricular inflow tract obstruction: a case report

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10667031 | biostudies-literature

Case report: Left ventricular perforation caused by right ventricular pacemaker lead

Project description:Background Perforation of the interventricular septum and left ventricular (LV) free wall by a right ventricular (RV) lead is an extremely rare and potentially life-threatening complication. In this case report, we discussed the diagnosis and management of a very unusual complication of pacemaker (PM) implantation, i.e., LV perforation brought on by an RV pacing lead. Case summary A 92-year-old man was admitted to Xiangyang No.1 People’s Hospital due to a complete atrioventricular block. We performed a dual-chamber PM implantation; however, on the second postoperative day (POD), pacemaker failure occurred. Thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan showed that RV lead had pierced the interventricular septum and LV free wall. A transvenous lead extraction of the penetrating lead was performed uneventfully, and RV lead was refixed at the lower RV septum on the 5th POD. Discussion Identification of high-risk patients is mandatory to prevent this serious complication, and transvenous lead extraction with cardiac surgery backup may be an option.

| S-EPMC9877449 | biostudies-literature

A rare case of idiopathic giant left ventricular pseudoaneurysm.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8114726 | biostudies-literature

A case of cardiac strangulation following epicardial pacemaker implantation in an adult: a case report.

Project description:BackgroundCardiac strangulation (CS) is a rare but potentially devastating complication caused by the leads of an epicardial pacemaker (EP). Most cases have been reported in paediatric patients, and there has been no report wherein the diagnosis was made in a living, adult patient, and treated successfully.Case summaryA 31-year-old woman with a history of atrial septal defect (ASD) patch closure and EP implantation for congenital atrial stand-still presented with dyspnoea on exertion. The blood investigation of the patient showed liver dysfunction, chest radiography showed pulmonary artery dilatation, and transthoracic echocardiography showed right chambers dysfunction. Right heart catheterization showed haemodynamics similar to those of constrictive pericarditis, eventually leading to the diagnosis of CS due to EP leads. The patient was successfully operated upon.DiscussionWe reported the first case where CS was diagnosed in adulthood and successfully treated with surgical intervention. Cardiac strangulation is challenging to diagnose because of the small number of cases reported and the lack of definitive diagnostic algorithms or criteria. Surgical EP lead removal should be performed without hesitation in cases where CS is considered the primary aetiology of critical symptoms or complications because surgical removal is the only fundamental treatment for CS. In addition, paediatric patients undergoing EP implantation need for close follow-up.

| S-EPMC8902180 | biostudies-literature

Open-chest epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia during a left ventricular assist device implantation: a case report.

Project description:BackgroundVentricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common after a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Further, the majority of post-LVAD ventricular tachycardias (VTs) are secondary to a preexisting cardiomyopathy substrate. Intraoperative ablation of patients with recurrent preoperative VTs may reduce post-LVAD VTs.Case summaryA 59-year-old female with advanced heart failure due to non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction = 24%) and recurrent VTs was referred for an LVAD implantation as a bridge to a heart transplant (INTERMACS Profile-5A). The previous endocardial ablation failed due to an epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate. Therefore, open-chest epicardial mapping during the LVAD implantation was indicated and three target areas of the arrhythmogenic substrate were found, which were ablated by radiofrequency applications. To minimize the cardiopulmonary bypass time, cardiopulmonary bypass was initiated after ablation, and then, an LVAD was implanted. An additional 68 min was required for mapping and ablation. All procedures were performed without any complications, and the post-operative course was uneventful. Thereafter, no VT episodes were observed without any anti-arrhythmic drugs during a 15-month follow-up with LVAD support.DiscussionIntraoperative epicardial mapping and ablation during an LVAD implantation can play an important role in the management of LVAD recipients with recurrent VAs.

| S-EPMC10325002 | biostudies-literature

Left Ventricular Assist Device With a Left Atrial Inflow Cannula for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Project description:Patients with restrictive or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are often ineligible for a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) due to the risk of suction events with a small left ventricular cavity size and left ventricular inflow cannula. We describe an alternative LVAD configuration using a left atrial inflow cannula as a bridge to transplantation in an adult with HCM. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

| S-EPMC8299761 | biostudies-literature

A Rare Case of Left Ventricular Noncompaction in LEOPARD Syndrome.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5881084 | biostudies-literature