Characteristics of Pruritus in Various Clinical Variants of Psoriasis: Results of the Multinational, Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Jaworecka K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8304988 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundPruritus is still a forgotten aspect of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and, to date, has never been adequately studied.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, and explore the characteristics, of pruritus in a well-defined cohort of HS patients.SettingAn academic hospital-based cross-sectional study in The Netherlands.MethodsA numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) was used to determine the prevalence of HS-related itch (NRS score ?3). Candidate predictors for pruritus were subsequently determined using logistic regression models, and the impact of pruritus was assessed using a modified five-dimensional (5-D) itch scale. Associated serological and histological markers of pruritus were (semi-)quantitatively investigated in a subpopulation.ResultsThe prevalence rate of pruritus in 211 HS patients was 57.3%, with a mean NRS score of 6.1 ± 2.0. Patients with a pruritus NRS score ?3 had more HS-affected body sites than patients with a score <3 (p < 0.001). The occurrence of a pruritus NRS score ?3 was associated with Hurley III disease (odds ratio [OR] 7.73; p = 0.003) and pain (OR 1.34; p < 0.001). Pruritus affected sleep and activities of daily living (ADL) in the majority of cases, with an associated modified 5-D itch score of 13.7 ± 3.6 (on a scale from 5 to 25) in 52 HS patients. Histological examination showed eosinophilic granulocytes were present in 25% (2/8) of the perilesional skin and 63% (10/16) of the lesional skin, while a perineural infiltrate was found in 25% (2/8) and 69% (11/16) of the perilesional and lesional skin, respectively.ConclusionPruritus is a frequent but underreported symptom in patients with HS. Its moderate to severe intensity and significant impact on daily activities have great potential to impair patients' quality of life.
| S-EPMC5602064 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction. We aimed to conduct a multinational cross-sectional online survey of medical students' attitudes toward, knowledge of, and experience with shared decision making (SDM). Methods. We conducted the survey from September 2016 until May 2017 using the following: 1) a convenience sample of students from four medical schools each in Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands (n = 12), and 2) all medical schools in the United Kingdom through the British Medical School Council (n = 32). We also distributed the survey through social media. Results. A total of 765 students read the information sheet and 619 completed the survey. Average age was 24, 69% were female. Mean SDM knowledge score was 83.6% (range = 18.8% to 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 82.8% to 84.5%). US students had the highest knowledge scores (86.2%, 95% CI = 84.8% to 87.6%). The mean risk communication score was 57.4% (range = 0% to 100%; 95% CI = 57.4% to 60.1%). Knowledge did not vary with age, race, gender, school, or school year. Attitudes were positive, except 46% believed SDM could only be done with higher educated patients, and 80.9% disagreed that physician payment should be linked to SDM performance (increased with years in training, P < 0.05). Attitudes did not vary due to any tested variable. Students indicated they were more likely than experienced clinicians to practice SDM (72.1% v. 48.8%). A total of 74.7% reported prior SDM training and 82.8% were interested in learning more about SDM. Discussion. SDM knowledge is high among medical students in all four countries. Risk communication is less well understood. Attitudes indicate that further research is needed to understand how medical schools deliver and integrate SDM training into existing curricula.
| S-EPMC6843737 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Intercountry comparability between studies on medication use in pregnancy is difficult due to dissimilarities in study design and methodology. This study aimed to examine patterns and factors associated with medications use in pregnancy from a multinational perspective, with emphasis on type of medication utilised and indication for use.Cross-sectional, web-based study performed within the period from 1 October 2011 to 29 February 2012. Uniform collection of drug utilisation data was performed via an anonymous online questionnaire.Multinational study in Europe (Western, Northern and Eastern), North and South America and Australia.Pregnant women and new mothers with children less than 1 year of age.Prevalence of and factors associated with medication use for acute/short-term illnesses, chronic/long-term disorders and over-the-counter (OTC) medication use.The study population included 9459 women, of which 81.2% reported use of at least one medication (prescribed or OTC) during pregnancy. Overall, OTC medication use occurred in 66.9% of the pregnancies, whereas 68.4% and 17% of women reported use of at least one medication for treatment of acute/short-term illnesses and chronic/long-term disorders, respectively. The extent of self-reported medicated illnesses and types of medication used by indication varied across regions, especially in relation to urinary tract infections, depression or OTC nasal sprays. Women with higher age or lower educational level, housewives or women with an unplanned pregnancy were those most often reporting use of medication for chronic/long-term disorders. Immigrant women in Western (adjusted OR (aOR): 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.87) and Northern Europe (aOR: 0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.83) were less likely to report use of medication for chronic/long-term disorders during pregnancy than non-immigrants.In this study, the majority of women in Europe, North America, South America and Australia used at least one medication during pregnancy. There was a substantial inter-region variability in the types of medication used.
| S-EPMC3927801 | biostudies-other
Project description:Benzathine penicillin G (BPG) is used as first-line treatment for most forms of syphilis and as secondary prophylaxis against rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Perceptions that poor quality of BPG is linked to reported adverse effects and therapeutic failure may impact syphilis and RHD control programs. Clinical networks and web-based advertising were used to obtain vials of BPG from a wide range of countries. The quality of BPG was assessed using a high performance liquid chromatography assay capable of detecting relevant impurities and degradation products. Tests for water content, presence of heavy metals and physical characteristics of BPG, including particle size analysis and optical microscopy, also were conducted. Thirty-five batches of BPG were sourced from 16 countries across 4 WHO regions. All batches passed the US Pharmacopeia requirements for BPG injection (content), with no evidence of breakdown products or other detected contaminants. Water content and heavy metal analysis (n = 11) indicated adherence to regulatory standards and Good Manufacturing Practice. Particle size analysis (n = 20) found two batches with aggregated particles (>400 µm) that were dispersed following sonication. Current batches of BPG were of satisfactory pharmaceutical quality but aggregated particles were found in a modest proportion of samples. Future studies should focus on the physical characteristics of BPG which may contribute to variations in plasma penicillin concentrations an observed needle blockages in clinical practice. Pharmacopeial monographs could be revised to include standards on particle size and crystal morphology of BPG.
| S-EPMC7580708 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cross-sectional study of the human vaginal microbiome in Flanders
| PRJEB50407 | ENA
Project description:Background: Although there is an ongoing understanding of psoriasis vulgaris (PV) pathogenesis, little is known about the proteomic diversity of psoriatic lesions between moderate and severe psoriasis. Objective: To evaluate the proteomic differences between moderate and severe psoriasis and determine biomarkers associated with disease severity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we report a proteomic analysis of psoriatic lesions from patients with severe PV (sPV group, n=7) using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS), as compared with patients with moderate psoriasis (mPV group, n=8). Results: 173 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were significantly differentially expressed between the sPV and mPV groups. Among them, 85 proteins were upregulated, while 88 were downregulated (FC ≥±1.5, P <0.05). Eighteen DEPs were mainly enriched in the IL−17 signalling pathway, Neutrophil extracellular trap formation, Neutrophil degranulation and NF−kappa B signalling pathway, which were associated with psoriasis pathogenesis. Ingenuity pathway (IPA) analysis identified TNF and TDP53 as the top upstream up-regulators, while Lipopolysaccharide and YAP1 were the top potential down-regulators. The main active pathways were antimicrobial peptides and PTEN signalling, while the inhibitory pathways were the neutrophil extracellular trap pathway, neutrophil degranulation, and IL-8 signalling. 4D-parallel reaction monitoring (4D-PRM) analysis suggested that KRT6A were downregulated in sPV.
2024-06-06 | PXD052886 |
Project description:BackgroundKi-67 is a cellular proliferative index that has variable expression during cell cycle. The absence of Ki-67 in the quiescent tissues and its expression in the proliferating cells had linked its possible role in the proliferative capacity of the tissues.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 314 patients with breast cancer who underwent various types of breast surgeries. Analyzed was done to find any possible correlation between the level of Ki67 and various patient and tumor characteristics and the survival rates.ResultsThe mean age was 48.73 years, the overall survival was 30.77 months, 90.8% of the patients were alive and 8.3% died from breast cancer. In 85.67% no recurrence was reported and 5% had local and axillary recurrences, the commonest sites of metastases were bones and the vertebrae (2.2% and 1.9%) respectively. The mean size of the tumor was 34.39 mm and the mean number of the positive axillary nodes was 4. The expression of Ki67 was around 5-10% in the majority of patients, the mean expression was 28.54%. There was significant correlation between the level of Ki67 and the histopathological grade of the tumor, p value 0.003, and there was no significant correlation with other variables. There was no relation between the overall survival and the Ki67 level.ConclusionKi67 is correlated with the grade of the tumor, and is not a predictor for the survival of breast cancer patients. It may predict aggressive behavior of the tumor and higher histopathological grades.
| S-EPMC6880115 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ContextMedical educational reform includes enhancing role modelling of clinical teachers. This requires faculty being aware of their role model status and performance. We developed the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) to generate individualized feedback on previously defined teaching qualities and role model status for faculty in (non) academic hospitals.Objectives(i) To examine whether teaching qualities of faculty were associated with their being seen as a specialist role model by residents, and (ii) to investigate whether those associations differed across residency years and specialties.Methods & materialsCross-sectional questionnaire survey amongst 549 Residents of 36 teaching programs in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. The main outcome measure was faculty being seen as specialist role models by residents. Statistical analyses included (i) Pearson's correlation coefficients and (ii) multivariable logistic generalized estimating equations to assess the (adjusted) associations between each of five teaching qualities and 'being seen as a role model'.Results407 residents completed a total of 4123 evaluations of 662 faculty. All teaching qualities were positively correlated with 'being seen as a role model' with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.49 for 'evaluation of residents' to 0.64 for 'learning climate' (P<0.001). Faculty most likely to be seen as good role models were those rated highly on 'feedback' (odds ratio 2.91, 95% CI: 2.41-3.51), 'a professional attitude towards residents' (OR 2.70, 95% CI: 2.34-3.10) and 'creating a positive learning climate' (OR 2.45, 95% CI: 1.97-3.04). Results did not seem to vary much across residency years. The relative strength of associations between teaching qualities and being seen as a role model were more distinct when comparing specialties.ConclusionsGood clinical educators are more likely to be seen as specialist role models for most residents.
| S-EPMC3012058 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundFor a randomized trial, the primary publication is usually the one which reports the results of the primary outcome and provides consolidated data from all study centers. Other aspects of a randomized trial's findings (that is, non-primary results) are often reported in subsequent publications.MethodsWe carried out a cross-sectional review of the characteristics and type of information reported in non-primary reports (n = 69) of randomized trials (indexed in PubMed core clinical journals in 2009) and whether they report pre-specified or exploratory analyses. We also compared consistency of information in non-primary publications with that reported in the primary publication.ResultsThe majority (n = 56; 81%) of non-primary publications were large, multicenter trials, published in specialty journals. Most reported subgroup analyses (n = 27; 39%), analyzing a specific subgroup of patients from the randomized trial, or reported on secondary outcomes (n = 29; 42%); 19% (n = 13) reported extended follow-up. Less than half reported details of trial registration (n = 30; 43%) or the trial protocol (n = 27; 39%) and in 41% (n = 28) it was unclear from reading the abstract that the report was not the primary publication for the trial. Non-primary publications often analyzed and reported multiple different outcomes (16% reported >20 outcomes) and in 10% (n = 7) it was unclear how many outcomes had actually been assessed; in 42% (n = 29) it was unclear whether the analyses reported were pre-specified or exploratory. Only 39% (n = 27) of non-primary publications described the primary outcome of the randomized trial, 6% (n = 4) reported its numerical results and 9% (n = 6) details of how participants were randomized.ConclusionNon-primary publications often lack important information about the randomized trial and the type of analyses conducted and whether these were pre-specified or exploratory to enable readers to accurately identify and assess the validity and reliably of the study findings. We provide recommendations for what information authors should include in non-primary reports of randomized trials.
| S-EPMC3733891 | biostudies-literature
Project description:mRNA microarray profiling was performed on healthy gingival biopsies from nonhuman primates (NHPs) (between 3 and 23 years old, and periodontitis gingival biopsies from NHPs (12-22 years old)
2014-10-15 | E-MTAB-1977 | biostudies-arrayexpress