Early Intervention of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Is a Favorable Factor for Short-Term Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Matsuo S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8305639 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BACKGROUND:Few data are available on the long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and on long PR programs in interstitial lung diseases (ILD). We aimed to evaluate the effects of PR on exercise capacity (6-Minute Walking Distance, 6MWD; Peak Work Rate, Wmax), quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), quadriceps force (QF) and objectively measured physical activity in ILD after the 6-month PR-program and after 1 year. METHODS:60 patients (64?±?11 years; 62% males; 23% with IPF) were randomly assigned to receive a 6 month-PR program or usual medical care. RESULTS:Exercise capacity, quality of life and muscle force increased significantly after the program as compared to control (mean,95%CI[ll to ul]; 6MWD +?72,[36 to 108] m; Wmax 19, [8 to 29]%pred; SGRQ -?12,[-?19 to -?6] points; QF 10, [1 to 18] %pred). The gain was sustained after 1 year (6MWD 73,[28 to 118] m; Wmax 23, [10 to 35]%pred; SGRQ -?11,[-?18 to -?4] points; QF 9.5, [1 to 18] %pred). Physical activity did not change. CONCLUSIONS:PR improves exercise tolerance, health status and muscle force in ILD. The benefits are maintained at 1-year follow-up. The intervention did not change physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00882817 .
| S-EPMC6149060 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMaintenance and repeated pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PRPs) for patients with COPD have attempted to prolong PRP benefits beyond 12-24 months. However, there is limited evidence as to the magnitude of benefit or the ideal interval between repeating the program under "real-world" conditions in which patients are referred based on clinical necessity. Therefore, we reviewed the effects of repeating PRP in a physician-referred cohort of patients with COPD.MethodsA total of 141 individuals with COPD completed PRP twice and 35 completed PRP three times over a 12-year period. We used linear mixed-effects models to quantify the magnitude and change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for each PRP. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc analysis compared the effects of different time intervals on 6MWD, SGRQ, and HADS between PRPs.ResultsDespite 39 mL/year average decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, overall 6MWD improved following each PRP (PRP1=58 m, P<0.0001; PRP2=42 m, P<0.0001; PRP3=32 m, P<0.003). Mean SGRQ decreased after PRP1 (-7.0 units; P<0.001) and PRP2 (-4.9 units; P<0.0001) but not after PRP3 (-3.2 units; P=0.10). HADS decreased after PRP1 (-1.9 units; P<0.0001) and PRP2 (-1.7 units; P=0.0001) but not after PRP3 (-0.4 units; P=0.63).ConclusionIn physician-referred patients who underwent repeat PRP as clinically required, there were clear benefits in functional exercise capacity following each repeat PRP, which was not affected by the time interval between PRPs. Health-related quality of life and mood improved after the first two PRPs, but not after a third.
| S-EPMC5388229 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Fibrotic lung changes are well-known complications of SARS, MERS, and ARDS from other causes and are anticipated in recovered COVID patients. However, there is limited data so far showing a temporal relationship between lung changes on imaging in the acute phase and follow-up imaging after recovery from the infection. We present 12 patients who demonstrate the development of interstitial lung changes and pulmonary fibrosis in the same distribution and pattern as the acute phase findings, up to 6 months after the acute infection, demonstrating a direct relationship between these changes and COVID-19 pneumonia.
| S-EPMC8005381 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The recommendation for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is weak with low-quality evidence. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate short-term PR effects and their maintenance after a 3-month follow-up. Fifty-four IPF patients were randomized into a group receiving a 3-week comprehensive, inpatient PR (n = 34, FVC: 74 ± 19% pred.) or usual care (UC) (n = 17, FVC: 72 ± 20%pred.). Outcomes were measured at baseline (T1), after intervention (T2), and 3 months after T2 (T3). A 6-min walk distance (6MWD) was used as the primary outcome and chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ) scores as the secondary outcome. Change in 6MWD from T1 to T2 (? = 61 m, 95% CI (18.5-102.4), p = 0.006) but not from T1 to T3 (? = 26 m, 95% CI (8.0-61.5), p = 0.16) differed significantly between groups. Higher baseline FVC and higher anxiety symptoms were significant predictors of better short-term 6MWD improvements. For the change in CRQ total score, a significant between-group difference from T1 to T2 (? = 3.0 pts, 95% CI (0.7-5.3), p = 0.01) and from T1 to T3 (? = 3.5 pts, 95% CI (1.5-5.4), p = 0.001) was found in favour of the PR group. To conclude, in addition to the short-term benefits, inpatient PR is effective at inducing medium-term quality of life improvements in IPF. PR in the early stages of the disease seems to provoke the best benefits.
| S-EPMC7290850 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPirfenidone is the first antifibrotic drug approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and it is used in the treatment of other interstitial pneumonias, such as unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) and connective tissue-related ILD. This study examined the efficacy of pirfenidone in patients with IPF and fibrotic idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (f-iNSIP).MethodsIn a retrospective real-life study, 67 IPF and 24 f-iNSIP patients were enrolled and classified into a pirfenidone group and a non-antifibrotic group. The level of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months were recorded. The level of KL-6 in serum was detected by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). The prognosis and safety outcomes were collected from patients.ResultsIn IPF patients, pirfenidone decreased the mean change of FVC and DLco, and decreased the proportion of patients with a ⩾10% decline in FVC or a ⩾15% decline in DLco compared with the non-antifibrotic group. There was no difference in the mean change of FVC and DLco between smokers and non-smokers who received pirfenidone treatment. There was an improvement in progression-free survival, defined as the time to the first occurrence of acute exacerbation or death related to pulmonary fibrosis. Moreover, the ratio of patients who experienced acute exacerbation and death related to pulmonary fibrosis was lower in the pirfenidone group. There was no change in lung function and prognosis between the pirfenidone and non-antifibrotic groups in f-iNSIP patients. The KL-6 level slightly decreased after 1 year of pirfenidone treatment but not significantly. Gastrointestinal and skin-related adverse events were most common, and four patients ceased treatment due to the side effects.ConclusionsPirfenidone safely reduced disease progression by improving the lung function and progression-free survival in IPF patients, with acceptable side effects. The efficacy of pirfenidone on f-iNSIP was not significant, suggesting the need for further studies.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
| S-EPMC7580189 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNon-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs) may demonstrate a progressive disease trajectory similar to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to identify novel F-ILD phenotypes in a multi-ethnic South-East Asian population.MethodsF-ILD subjects (n=201) were analysed using unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis and their outcomes compared against IPF (n=86).ResultsFour clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (n=53, 26.4%) comprised older Chinese males with high body mass index (BMI) and comorbidity burden, higher baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) percentage predicted and lower diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) percentage predicted. They had similar mortality to IPF. Cluster 2 (n=67, 33.3%) had younger female non-smokers with low comorbidity burden, groundglass changes on high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT) and a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titre ≥1:160. They had lower baseline FVC and higher DLCO, low mortality and slower lung function decline. Cluster 3 (n=42, 20.9%) consisted male smokers with low comorbidity burden, emphysema on HRCT and high baseline lung function. They had low mortality and slow lung function decline. Cluster 4 (n=39, 19.4%) was the highest risk and comprised of mainly Indians with high BMI. They had the highest proportion of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and previous pulmonary tuberculosis. Subjects had the lowest baseline lung function, highest mortality, and fastest lung function decline. Survival differences across clusters remained significant following adjustment for treatment.ConclusionsWe identified four distinct F-ILD clinical phenotypes with varying disease trajectories. This demonstrates heterogeneity in F-ILD and the need for complementary approaches for classification and prognostication beyond ATS/ERS guideline diagnosis.
| S-EPMC9344411 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Simultaneous interpretation (SI) is a cognitively demanding process that has been associated with enhanced memory and executive functions. It is unclear, however, if the previously evidenced interpreter advantages are developed through training and/or experience with SI or rather represent inherent characteristics that allow success in the field. The present study aimed to disentangle these possibilities through a longitudinal examination of students earning a Master of Conference Interpreting and two control populations. The students were tested at the beginning and end of their programs on measures of memory and executive functioning that have previously demonstrated an interpreter advantage. The results revealed no inherent advantage among the students of interpretation. However, an SI training-specific advantage was revealed in verbal short-term memory; the students of interpretation, but not the two control groups, showed a gain between the testing sessions. This controlled longitudinal study demonstrates that training in simultaneous interpretation is associated with cognitive changes.
| S-EPMC7089711 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The presence of a lung lesion is common in microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) can lead to a poor prognosis. Although myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (MPO-ANCA) are often present in patients with MPA, patients with ILD and MPO-ANCA positivity but without other manifestations of systemic vasculitis have also been reported. Therefore, the possible association between MPO-ANCA, MPA, and idiopathic ILD remains unclear. This problematic matter has influenced the treatment strategy of MPO-ANCA-positive ILD patients without systemic vasculitis. Clinicians should undertake treatment with careful consideration of the four major causes of death in MPO-ANCA-positive ILD: acute exacerbation of ILD, progressive lung fibrosis, infectious comorbidities, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Further, clinicians need to carefully judge whether inflammation or fibrosis is the dominant condition with reference to the patient's clinical domain and radiopathological lung features. Recently, anti-fibrotic agents such as nintedanib and pirfenidone were shown to be effective in treating various etiologies associated with ILD and have thus led to the widening of treatment options. In this review, the clinical characteristics, radiopathology, prognosis, and therapeutic options in patients with MPO-ANCA-positive ILD are summarized using limited information from previous studies.
| S-EPMC9267459 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and study aims
Cancer is one of the main causes of illness, burden and death in Europe. The Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the EU estimated 2.7 million new cancer cases. For all cancers, between 53-79% of men and 41-62% of women are diagnosed with incurable disease. Their cancer treatment is life-prolonging but will not cure the disease.
Cancer is also a major and growing contributor to disability (loss of function). Recent global estimates suggest a loss of 382 disability-adjusted life years per 1000 individuals. Disability is a poorly recognised and undertreated consequence of incurable cancer. Over time, loss of function results in people not being able to continue with valued roles and routines, to manage usual household and social activities, and to self-care. One-third of adults with cancer require assistance to perform basic activities like washing and dressing, and half need help with extended activities like shopping and transportation. Disability reduces quality of life and well-being. Disability related to daily activity is closely related to unplanned hospital admissions and mortality.
Palliative rehabilitation empowers people with incurable conditions to actively manage their condition themselves, enabling them to live fully and enjoy the best health-related quality of life possible, including cancer towards the end of life. It aims to reduce symptoms and help people to stay independent and socially active. WHO policy on Universal Health Coverage states both rehabilitation and palliative care as essential, quality health services. It recommends they be integrated within and between primary, secondary, and tertiary health systems using a multi-professional workforce. While integrated rehabilitation has been achieved for people with chronic respiratory, cardiac and stroke conditions, this is not the case for people with cancer, especially those living with incurable disease. Access to palliative care services has increased but access to rehabilitation remains varied.
In this study, we are evaluating a rehabilitation intervention that has been designed to meet the needs of people living with advanced cancer. The study is taking place in countries across Europe, and we plan to recruit 340 patients from hospitals. We aim to find out if and how the rehabilitation intervention affects the people who take part in the study. We will also study how it fits in with current healthcare services.
Who can participate?
This study is suitable for patients aged 18 or over, diagnosed with advanced solid cancer: lung, colorectal, breast, prostate or other, irrespective of timing in relation to any oncology or palliative care treatments.
What does the study involve?
After signing the informed consent, the participation in this trial will last 16 weeks. Participation in this trial is voluntary and the participants can withdraw any time.
During the first face to face visit, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either INSPIRE rehabilitation intervention + usual care or usual care only. The random allocation will be done using a software maintained by the King’s Clinical Trials Unit.
The trial schedule depends on group allocation:
Participants allocated to usual care only will be asked to complete questionnaires at weeks 4, 8 and 16 either on their own, with a help of a friend or family member, or with the researcher over the telephone or in person. It should take 30 – 45 minutes to compete all the questions.
Participants allocated to the INSPIRE rehabilitation + usual care will be offered up to 3 rehabilitation visits in addition to the questionnaire completion at weeks 4, 8 and 16. Each visit will last 30 -90 minutes.
- 1st rehabilitation visit will be face to face and will be scheduled no later than 14 days after joining the trial. During this visit, a rehabilitation action plan will be put together.
- 2nd rehabilitation will be scheduled around 4 weeks, but no later than 5 weeks after joining the trial.
- 3rd rehabilitation visit will be scheduled around 6 weeks, but no later than 7 weeks after joining the trial.
Both visits 2 and 3 can be face to face, via telephone or via video call and participants will have the opportunity to review and, if needed, change their rehabilitation action plan.
There won’t be any changes in usual care for participants that have been allocated to the rehabilitation intervention group.
Participants allocated to the INSPIRE rehabilitation intervention may also be invited to an optional one-to-one interview with a member of a research team. The interview will last around 30-60 minutes
At the week 28 the research team will look at the participants medical notes to see how they’re getting on; however participants will not need to do anything at this time.
The trial team will collect participants’ medical history and demographic data; however demographic data will be anonymised and only year of birth and initials will be shared with the research teams. All data will be stored on a password-protected database to which only authorised individuals will have access.
| 47299 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Background and objectiveInhalational exposures are a known cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD), but little is understood about their prevalence across ILD subtypes and their relationship with pulmonary function and survival.MethodsPatients with fibrotic ILD were identified from the multicentre Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Patients completed questionnaires regarding ILD-related occupational and environmental exposures. The relationship between exposures and the outcomes of baseline age, gender, family history, pulmonary function and survival was analysed using linear and logistic regression models, linear mixed-effect regression models and survival analysis using multivariable Cox proportional hazards along with the log-rank test.ResultsThere were 3820 patients included in this study, with 2385 (62%) having ILD-related inhalational exposure. Exposed patients were younger, particularly in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis subgroup. Inhalational exposure was associated with male gender (adjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28-1.68, p < 0.001) and family history of pulmonary fibrosis (adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.40-2.15, p < 0.001). Patients with any inhalational exposure had improved transplant-free survival (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, p = 0.001); this effect persisted across diagnostic subtypes. The relationship between exposures and annual change in forced vital capacity varied by ILD subtype.ConclusionPatients with fibrotic ILD report high prevalence of inhalational exposures across ILD subtypes. These exposures were associated with younger age at diagnosis, male gender and family history of pulmonary fibrosis. Identification of an inhalational exposure was associated with a survival benefit. These findings suggest that inhaled exposures may impact clinical outcomes in patients with ILD, and future work should characterize the mechanisms underlying these relationships.
| S-EPMC9296585 | biostudies-literature