Dataset Information

Government Policy for the Procurement of Food from Local Family Farming in Brazilian Public Institutions.

ABSTRACT: This study aims to explore and compare Brazilian public institutional food services' characteristics concerning the implementation of the government policy for the procurement of food from family farming (FF) and the opinions of food service managers on the benefits and difficulties of its implementation. We conducted a cross-sectional study employing an online questionnaire. The results were stratified by purchase. The Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests were applied. Five hundred forty-one food services' managers participated in the study. Most claimed to buy food from FF, and this acquisition was more frequent among those working in institutions of municipalities <50,000 inhabitants, and educational and self-managed institutions. Those buying from FF developed more actions to promote healthy and sustainable food. Most recognized that the purchase could boost local farming and the economy and improve the institution's food. However, the managers believe that the productive capacity of FF, the lack of technical assistance to farmers, production seasonality, and the bureaucratic procurement process hinder this type of purchase. The self-management of food services and the small size of the municipality might be associated with implementing the direct purchase policy from FF, which can contribute to building healthier and more sustainable food systems. However, the lack of public management support and the weak productive fabric may pose an obstacle to its maintenance or dissemination. The strengthening and consolidation of these policies require more significant government investments in productive infrastructure for family farming.

SUBMITTER: Soares P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8305705 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Improving drug accessibility and rational drug use are major challenges for China’s healthcare reform. In 2018, the Chinese government introduced a novel nationwide policy of centralized drug procurement for off-patent drugs, focusing on improving drug utilization patterns of public medical institutions. Objective: To estimate the impacts of the Chinese centralized drug procurement policy (the so-called “4 + 7” policy) on drug utilization in public medical institutions. Methods: A retrospective natural experimental design and difference-in-difference method were applied using cross-region data extracted from the national procurement database. Eleven “4 + 7” pilot cities (intervention group) and eleven non-pilot provinces (control group) were matched. In addition, “4 + 7” policy-related drugs (n = 116) were selected as study samples, including 25 drugs in the 4 + 7” procurement List (“4 + 7” List drugs) and their alternative drugs (n = 91) that have not yet been covered by centralized procurement policy. Then, the “4 + 7” List drugs were divided into bid-winning and non-winning drugs according to the bidding results, and they were sorted into generic and original drugs. Defined daily dose (DDD) was used to standardize the quantity of drugs used. Results: In the 1-year procurement period, the overall completion rate of agreed procurement volume reached 191.4% in pilot cities. Owing to policy impact, the consumption increased by 405.31% in bid-winning drugs (β = 1.62, p < 0.001) and decreased by 62.28% (β = −0.98, p < 0.001) in non-winning drugs. The overall use proportion of bid-winning drugs increased from 17.03% to 73.61% with statistical significance (β = 1.48, p < 0.001), and increments were also detected in all healthcare settings, regions, and anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) categories (all p-values < 0.05). Generics and originators were detected with 67.53% increment (β = 0.52, p < 0.001) and 26.88% drop (β = −0.31, p = 0.006) in consume volume. The use proportion of generics increased from 59.23% to 78.44% with significance (β = 0.24, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals (β = 0.31), secondary hospitals (β = 0.23), and primary healthcare centers (β = 0.11) (all p-values < 0.001). The use proportion of relatively quality-guaranteed drugs (i.e. bid-winning and original drugs) increased from 56.69% to 93.61% with significance (β = 0.61, p < 0.001), and similar increments were also detected in all healthcare settings, regions, and ATC categories (all p-values < 0.05). Conclusion: Healthcare providers demonstrated good compliance with the “4 + 7” policy in completing contracted procurement volume. Centralized drug procurement policy promoted drug consumption gradually concentrated on bid-winning drugs, generic drugs, and more importantly, quality-guaranteed drugs.

Project description:ObjectivesEffective government policies are essential to increase the healthiness of food environments. The International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases (NCDs) Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) has developed a monitoring tool (the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)) and process to rate government policies to create healthy food environments against international best practice. The aims of this study were to pilot test the Food-EPI, and revise the tool and process for international implementation.SettingNew Zealand.ParticipantsThirty-nine informed, independent public health experts and non-governmental organisation (NGO) representatives.Primary and secondary outcome measuresEvidence on the extent of government implementation of different policies on food environments and infrastructure support was collected in New Zealand and validated with government officials. Two whole-day workshops were convened of public health experts and NGO representatives who rated performance of their government for seven policy and seven infrastructure support domains against international best practice. In addition, the raters evaluated the level of difficulty of rating, and appropriateness and completeness of the evidence presented for each indicator.ResultsInter-rater reliability was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88; Gwet's AC2) using quadratic weights, and increased to 0.89 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92) after deletion of the problematic indicators. Based on raters' assessments and comments, major changes to the Food-EPI tool include strengthening the leadership domain, removing the workforce development domain, a stronger focus on equity, and adding community-based programmes and government funding for research on obesity and diet-related NCD prevention, as good practice indicators.ConclusionsThe resulting tool and process will be promoted and offered to countries of varying size and income globally. International benchmarking of the extent of government policy implementation on food environments has the potential to catalyse greater government action to reduce obesity and NCDs, and increase civil society's capacity to advocate for healthy food environments.

Project description:BackgroundLocal government authorities are well-placed to invest in evidence-based food policies that promote a population-wide shift to healthy and sustainable diets. This study describes the contextual factors that facilitated or impeded policy-making related to healthy and sustainable diets within a 'best-performing' local government in Victoria, Australia.MethodsGuided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), data from semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in developing the City of Greater Bendigo's Food System Strategy were analysed using the seven-stage Framework Method.ResultsSemi-structured interviews (n = 24) were conducted with City of Greater Bendigo employees (n = 15) and key stakeholders working for local organisations (n = 6) or at a state or national level (n = 3). Interviewees mostly held positions of leadership (n = 20) and represented diverse areas of focus from health (n = 7), food systems (n = 4) and planning and public policy (n = 3). Data analysis revealed 12 cross-cutting themes; eight facilitating factors and four impeding factors. Facilitating factors included perseverance, community engagement, supportive state policy, effective leadership, a global platform and networks, partnerships, workforce capacity and passion, and the use of scientific evidence. Impeding factors included access to secure, ongoing financial resources, prohibitive state and federal policy, COVID-related disruptions to community engagement and competing stakeholder interests. Overall, this study suggests that the City of Greater Bendigo's success in developing an evidence-based local food system policy is built upon (i) a holistic worldview that embraces systems-thinking and credible frameworks, (ii) a sustained commitment and investment throughout the inner-setting over time, and (iii) the ability to establish and nurture meaningful partnerships with community groups, neighbouring local government areas and state-level stakeholders, built upon values of reciprocity and respect.ConclusionsDespite insufficient resourcing and prohibitive policy at higher levels of government, this 'best performing' local government in Victoria, Australia developed an evidence-based food system policy by employing highly skilled and passionate employees, embracing a holistic worldview towards planetary health and harnessing global networks. Local government authorities aspiring to develop integrated food policy should nurture a workforce culture of taking bold evidence-informed policy action, invest in mechanisms to enable long-standing partnerships with community stakeholders and be prepared to endure a 'slow-burn' approach.

Dataset Information

Government Policy for the Procurement of Food from Local Family Farming in Brazilian Public Institutions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets