Dataset Information

Development of a narrow-band imaging classification to reduce the need for routine biopsies of gastric polyps.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Most incidental gastric polyps identified during upper endoscopy are considered low-risk. However, current guidelines recommend sampling all gastric polyps for histopathologic analysis. We aimed to devise a simple narrow-band imaging (NBI) classification to reduce the need for routine biopsies of low-risk gastric polyps.

Methods

Pairs of NBI and white-light images were collected from 73 gastric polyps for which concurrent histopathologic diagnosis was available. A diagnostic accuracy cohort study was performed. Two blinded endoscopists independently analysed NBI features of each polyp for color, vessel pattern, surface pattern, and any combinations thereof to develop a classification scheme to differentiate low-risk polyps (fundic-gland or hyperplastic) from high-risk polyps (adenomatous or adenocarcinoma) and fundic-gland polyps (FGPs) from non-FGPs.

Results

An isolated lacy vessel pattern and a homogenous absence of surface pattern successfully differentiated low-risk from high-risk gastric polyps. Combining both descriptors into a single algorithm resulted in a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 100%-100%], positive predictive value (PPV) of 13.7% (95% CI: 2.6-24.8), sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 100%-100%), and specificity of 53.7% (95% CI: 45.3%-62.0%) for high-risk polyps. This would reduce the number of polyps requiring biopsy by 50%, while still capturing all high-risk polyps. Regarding FGPs, using a rule not to biopsy polyps with isolated lacy vessels resulted in a 94.9% NPV (95% CI: 89.2%-100%), 63.2% PPV (95% CI: 47.2%-79.2%), 94.8% sensitivity (95% CI: 89.5%-100%), and 63.6% specificity (95% CI: 51.3%-76.0%) for non-FGPs.

Conclusion

In this derivation cohort study, NBI is helpful for differentiating between high-risk and low-risk gastric polyps, thereby reducing the need for routine sampling of low-risk polyps. These results need to be validated in a separate test population.

SUBMITTER: Asztalos IB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8309680 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Accurate optical characterisation and removal of small adenomas (<10?mm) at colonoscopy would allow hyperplastic polyps to be left in situ and surveillance intervals to be determined without the need for histopathology. Although accurate in specialist practice the performance of narrow band imaging (NBI), colonoscopy in routine clinical practice is poorly understood.NBI-assisted optical diagnosis was compared with reference standard histopathological findings in a prospective, blinded study, which recruited adults undergoing routine colonoscopy in six general hospitals in the UK. Participating colonoscopists (N=28) were trained using the NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification (relating to colour, vessel structure and surface pattern). By comparing the optical and histological findings in patients with only small polyps, test sensitivity was determined at the patient level using two thresholds: presence of adenoma and need for surveillance. Accuracy of identifying adenomatous polyps <10?mm was compared at the polyp level using hierarchical models, allowing determinants of accuracy to be explored.Of 1688 patients recruited, 722 (42.8%) had polyps <10?mm with 567 (78.5%) having only polyps <10?mm. Test sensitivity (presence of adenoma, N=499 patients) by NBI optical diagnosis was 83.4% (95% CI 79.6% to 86.9%), significantly less than the 95% sensitivity (p<0.001) this study was powered to detect. Test sensitivity (need for surveillance) was 73.0% (95% CI 66.5% to 79.9%). Analysed at the polyp level, test sensitivity (presence of adenoma, N=1620 polyps) was 76.1% (95% CI 72.8% to 79.1%). In fully adjusted analyses, test sensitivity was 99.4% (95% CI 98.2% to 99.8%) if two or more NICE adenoma characteristics were identified. Neither colonoscopist expertise, confidence in diagnosis nor use of high definition colonoscopy independently improved test accuracy.This large multicentre study demonstrates that NBI optical diagnosis cannot currently be recommended for application in routine clinical practice. Further work is required to evaluate whether variation in test accuracy is related to polyp characteristics or colonoscopist training.The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01603927).

Project description:BackgroundIn recent years, two new narrow-band imaging (NBI) classifications have been proposed: The NBI international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification and Japanese NBI expert team (JNET) classification. Most validation studies of the two new NBI classifications were conducted in classification setting units by experienced endoscopists, and the application of use in different centers among endoscopists with different endoscopy skills remains unknown.AimTo evaluate clinical application and possible problems of NICE and JNET classification for the differential diagnosis of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.MethodsSix endoscopists with varying levels of experience participated in this study. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with a total of 125 lesions were photographed during non-magnifying conventional white-light colonoscopy, non-magnifying NBI, and magnifying NBI. The three groups of endoscopic pictures of each lesion were evaluated by the six endoscopists in randomized order using the NICE and JENT classifications separately. Then we calculated the six endoscopists' sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each category of the two classifications.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of JNET classification type 1 and 3 were similar to NICE classification type 1 and 3 in both the highly experienced endoscopist (HEE) and less-experienced endoscopist (LEE) groups. The specificity of JNET classification type 1 and 3 and NICE classification type 3 in both the HEE and LEE groups was > 95%, and the overall interobserver agreement was good in both groups. The sensitivity of NICE classification type 3 lesions for diagnosis of SM-d carcinoma in the HEE group was significantly superior to that in the LEE group (91.7% vs 83.3%; P = 0.042). The sensitivity of JNET classification type 2B lesions for the diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia or superficial submucosal invasive carcinoma in the HEE and LEE groups was 53.8% and 51.3%, respectively. Compared with other types of JNET classification, the diagnostic ability of type 2B was the weakest.ConclusionThe treatment strategy of the two classification type 1 and 3 lesions can be based on the results of endoscopic examination. JNET type 2B lesions need further examination.