Project description:Tricuspid valve (TV) repair techniques other than annuloplasty remain challenging and frequently end in tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in complicated cases. However, the results of TVR are suboptimal compared with TV repair. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of TV edge-to-edge repair (E2E) compared to TVR for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). We retrospectively reviewed 230 patients with severe TR who underwent E2E (n=139) or TVR (n=91) from 2001 to 2020. Clinical and echocardiographic results were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis and propensity score matching. The two groups showed no significant differences in early mortality and morbidities. During the mean follow-up of 106.2±68.8 months, late severe TR and TV reoperation rates were not significantly different between groups. E2E group, however, showed better outcomes in overall survival (p=0.023), freedom from significant tricuspid stenosis (TS) (trans-tricuspid pressure gradient ≥5 mmHg, p=0.021), and freedom from TV-related events (p<0.001). Matched analysis showed consistent results. E2E for severe TR presented more favorable clinical outcomes than TVR. Our study supports that E2E might be a valuable option in severe TR surgery, avoiding TVR.
Project description:AimsTranscatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has gained widespread use for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in symptomatic patients with high operative risk. Although secondary TR is the most common pathology, some patients exhibit primary or predominantly primary TR. Characterization of patients with these pathologies in the T-TEER context has not been systematically performed.Methods and resultsPatients assigned to T-TEER by the interdisciplinary heart team were consecutively recruited in two European centres over 4 years. Echocardiographic images were evaluated to distinguish between primary and secondary causes of TR. Both groups were compared concerning procedural results. A total of 339 patients were recruited, 13% with primary TR and 87% with secondary TR. Patients with primary TR had a smaller right ventricle (basal diameter 45 vs. 49 mm, P = 0.004), a better right ventricular function (fractional area change 45 vs. 41%, P = 0.001), a smaller right (28 vs. 34 cm2, P = 0.021) and left (52 vs. 67 mL/m2, P = 0.038) atrium, and a better left ventricular ejection fraction (60 vs. 52%, P = 0.005). The severity of TR was similar in primary and secondary TR at baseline (TR vena contracta width pre-interventional 13 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 5 mm, P = 0.19), and T-TEER significantly reduced TR in both groups (TR vena contracta width post-interventional 4 ± 3 vs. 5 ± 5 mm, P = 0.10). These findings remained stable after propensity score matching. Complications were similar between both groups.ConclusionT-TEER confers equally safe and effective reduction of TR in patients with primary and secondary TR.
Project description:AimTo evaluate short-term changes in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) in secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), their predictors and impact on mortality.Methods and resultsThis is a retrospective analysis of SMR patients undergoing successful M-TEER (post-procedural mitral regurgitation ≤2+) at 13 European centres. Among 503 patients evaluated 79 (interquartile range [IQR] 40-152) days after M-TEER, 173 (35%) showed ≥1 degree of TR improvement, 97 (19%) had worsening of TR, and 233 (46%) remained unchanged. Smaller baseline left atrial diameter and residual mitral regurgitation 0/1+ were independent predictors of TR ≤2+ after M-TEER. There was a significant association between TR changes and New York Heart Association class and pulmonary artery systolic pressure decrease at echocardiographic re-assessment. At a median follow-up of 590 (IQR 209-1103) days from short-term echocardiographic re-assessment, all-cause mortality was lower in patients with improved compared to those with unchanged/worsened TR (29.6% vs. 42.3% at 3 years; log-rank p = 0.034). Baseline TR severity was not associated with mortality, whereas TR 0/1+ and 2+ at short-term follow-up was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to TR 3/4+ (30.6% and 35.6% vs. 55.6% at 3 years; p < 0.001). A TR ≤2+ after M-TEER was independently associated with a 42% decreased risk of mortality (p = 0.011).ConclusionMore than one third of patients with SMR undergoing successful M-TEER experienced an improvement in TR. Pre-procedural TR was not associated with outcome, but a TR ≤2+ at short-term follow-up was independently associated with long-term mortality. Optimal M-TEER result and a small left atrium were associated with a higher likelihood of TR ≤2+ after M-TEER.
Project description:BackgroundAmyloidosis is defined by abnormal protein folding and subsequent deposition in tissues. Cardiac involvement is usually related to misfolded monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains or misfolded transthyretin; however, apolipoprotein A-1-associated amyloidosis is a hereditary form of amyloidosis resulting from mutations in the AAPOA1 gene that can also result in cardiac amyloidosis. Although there have been advancements in noninvasive algorithms for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) may still be warranted. All individuals undergoing EMB are susceptible to complications, including tricuspid valve injury resulting in severe tricuspid valve regurgitation.Case summaryOur patient is a 70-year-old white man presented with symptoms of dyspnoea on exertion and decreased functional capacity, diagnosed previously with apolipoprotein A-I cardiac amyloidosis, confirmed by EMB. He developed progressive right-sided heart failure secondary to iatrogenic flail tricuspid leaflet related to the diagnostic EMB. He underwent a successful transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair with 4D intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. At the recent follow-up, the patient showed improved symptoms, with increased stamina, and transoesophageal echocardiography revealed a 65% ejection fraction and mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR).DiscussionTricuspid valve injury is one of the complications associated with EMB, which can result in severe TR. Transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair can be a useful option for patients considered too high risk for surgical intervention, such as those with advanced cardiac amyloidosis.
Project description:BackgroundA mismatch between tricuspid leaflet size and annular dilation is one of the morphological features tied to the development of tricuspid regurgitation (TR).AimsWe assessed the association of the leaflet-to-annulus index (LAI) with residual TR after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent TEER for TR were enrolled. Significant residual TR was defined as a post-procedural TR ≥3+, and patients were divided into two groups according to the amount of residual TR. The LAI was retrospectively calculated using procedural transoesophageal echocardiography and was defined as follows: (anterior leaflet length+septal leaflet length)/septolateral tricuspid annulus diameter.ResultsOf 140 patients, 43 patients had residual TR ≥3+ after TEER. The patients with residual TR ≥3+ had a lower LAI compared to those with residual TR <3+ (1.04±0.10 vs 1.13±0.09; p=0.001). In multivariable analysis, the LAI was associated with residual TR ≥3+ (odds ratio [OR] [per 0.1 increase]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.35-0.94; p=0.02), independent of baseline TR severity or coaptation gap size. Patients with residual TR ≥3+ had a higher incidence of the composite outcome, consisting of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation within one year after TEER (47.1% vs 26.6%, p=0.02). Residual TR ≥3+ was an independent predictor of the composite outcome within one year (hazard ratio: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.01-4.11; p=0.04).ConclusionsThe leaflet-to-annulus mismatch (i.e., LAI) is associated with residual TR ≥3+ after TEER for TR. A detailed echocardiographic analysis of the tricuspid valve will be conducive to identifing suitable subjects for TEER.
Project description:Transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has emerged as an option for treating patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Few studies have explored intraprocedural maneuvers to optimize leaflet-grasping T-TEER in order to improve technical success. This case series of 3 patients describes maneuvers that facilitated T-TEER in patients with large coaptation gaps or short leaflet lengths. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
Project description:A patient with severe mitral regurgitation and chronic systolic heart failure taking inotropic support at home presents for transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, complicated by torrential mitral regurgitation from damaged mitral leaflets requiring escalating mechanical circulatory support and ultimately expedited orthotopic heart transplantation. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
Project description:Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is the most widely used approach for tricuspid regurgitation in patients with prohibitive surgical risk. However, TEER might not be feasible in advanced tricuspid regurgitation. In such cases, a stepwise approach with initial annuloplasty and subsequent TEER can be a worthwhile alternative, which is reported in this series. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.) Central Illustration
Project description:Highlights•Tricuspid regurgitation with mitral valve disease is associated with poor outcomes.•Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of the tricuspid valve can be done successfully.•Intraprocedural echocardiography is essential for transcatheter tricuspid therapies.
Project description:AimsPatients affected by functional mitral regurgitation represent an increasingly high-risk population. Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) has emerged as a promising treatment option for these patients. However, there is limited research on the comparative outcomes of TEER versus surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr). This study seeks to compare the demographics, complications, and outcomes of TEER and SMVr based on a real-world analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.Methods and resultsIn the NIS database, from the years 2016 to 2018, a total of 6233 and 2524 patients who underwent SMVr and TEER were selected, respectively. The mean ages of the patients were 65.68 years (SMVr) and 78.40 years (TEER) (p < 0.01). The mortality rate of patients who received SMVr was similar to that of patients who were treated with TEER (1.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.603). Patients who underwent SMVr more likely suffered from perioperative complications including cardiogenic shock (2.3% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (1.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.025), and cerebrovascular infarction (0.9% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.013). The average length of hospital stay was longer (8.59 vs. 4.13 days, p < 0.001) for SMVr compared to TEER; however, the average cost of treatment was higher ($218 728.25 vs. $215 071.74, p = 0.031) for TEER compared to SMVr. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that SMVr was associated with worse adjusted cardiogenic shock (OR, 7.347 [95% CI, 3.574-15.105]; p < 0.01) and acute kidney injury (OR, 2.793 [95% CI, 2.356-3.311]; p < 0.01).ConclusionPatients who underwent TEER demonstrated a notable decrease in postoperative complications and a shorter hospitalization period when compared to those who underwent SMVr.