Dataset Information

The Characteristics of Capnocytophaga Infection: 10 Years of Experience.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Capnocytopha ga is a gram-negative, facultative anaerobe. Human infection is rare but can lead to devastating outcomes. Capnocytophaga canimorsus can cause sepsis following an animal bite, whereas human-oral-associated Capnocytophaga infections were reported in immunocompromised patients. Current data on these infections are not robust. Our goal is to provide a contemporary description of a unique characteristic of Capnocytophaga infections.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all patients with Capnocytophaga infection from January 2010 to August 2020 at 3 main hospitals of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota; Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida. We collected baseline demographic data, clinical characteristics, microbiological data, and outcomes of C. canimorsus and human-oral-associated Capnocytophaga infection.

Results

Among 82 patients with Capnocytophaga infection, 46 patients (56.0%) had bacteremia. The most common species identified in this group was C. sputigena (57.9%), followed by C. canimorsus (34.8%). Patients with human-oral-associated Capnocytophaga bacteremia were often immunocompromised, presented with neutropenic fever, and had worse 6-month all-cause mortality compared to C. canimorsus bacteremia (36.4% vs 6.2%, P = .03). They also had a higher β-lactamase production rate (36.4% vs 0.0%, P = .02). Among patients without bacteremia, the main clinical syndrome was polymicrobial head and neck infections (47.2%).

Conclusions

Human-oral-associated Capnocytophaga bacteremia occurs primarily in immunocompromised patients, particularly those with hematologic malignancy. In contrast, C. canimorsus bacteremia is more likely to present with community-onset infection related to zoonotic exposure. Human-oral-associated Capnocytophaga infection without bacteremia is frequently isolated in polymicrobial infection; this phenomenon's significance is yet to be fully understood.

SUBMITTER: Chesdachai S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8314946 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMost patients with high-risk melanomas develop metastasis within the first few years after diagnosis. However, late recurrence of melanoma is seen in patients that metastasize more than 10 years after the primary diagnosis; a metastasis after 15 years is considered an ultra-late recurrence. It is critical to better understand the clinical and biological characteristics of this subset of melanoma patients in order to offer an individual treatment plan and prevent metastasis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed melanoma patients with recurrence ≥10 years after a primary diagnosis documented between 1993 and 2012 at the skin cancer center of the University Medical Center Leipzig, Germany. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature and compared the results with our data. Available archived primary melanoma tissue was investigated with a seven-marker immunohistochemical signature (immunoprint®) previously validated to reliably identify high-risk patients within stages IB-III.ResultsOut of 36 analyzed patients, a third metastasized ultra-late (≥15 years). The mean age at initial diagnosis was 51 years, with women being diagnosed comparatively younger than men. The largest proportion of patients with late recurrence had primary melanomas located on the trunk. The immunoprint® signature of the available primary melanomas allowed the accurate prediction of a high risk. However, it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion from the small number of cases that could be analyzed with immunoprint® (n = 2) in this study. Apart from the primary tumor characteristics, the laboratory values at time of metastasis, comorbidities and outcome are also shown.ConclusionLate and ultra-late recurrent melanomas seem not to differ from melanomas in general, apart from a distinctly higher proportion of lower leg localizations in ultra-late recurrent melanomas. The immunoprint® signature may help to identify high-risk primary tumors at the time of initial diagnosis. However, apart from the risk profile of the primary tumor, it seems that individual immune surveillance can control residual tumor cells for more than a decade. Advanced age and increasing comorbidities may contribute to a disturbed immunological balance.