Dataset Information

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Versus MIGS: Forgotten Art or First-Step Procedure in Selected Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

To evaluate the long-term effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medication of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) compared to minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and its potential in clinical practice.

Methods

A total of 342 consecutive patients (stand-alone procedures) were included. One hundred and five patients underwent SLT treatment (360° SLT, 95-105 spots, Trabeculas SLT ARCLaser, Nürnberg, DE), 107 patients had an ab interno-derived trabeculotomy (Trabectome^®, NeoMedix, Tustin, USA), and 130 patients received iStent inject^® implantation (2 implants-Glaukos, CA, USA). IOP and glaucoma therapy were evaluated preoperatively, 1 day, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using a regression model and propensity matching score (reduced cohort number) using SPSS v20.0. Kaplan-Meier analysis was included using the following six criteria: criterion A (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg with or without medication, qualified success), criterion B (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg with or without medication, qualified success), criterion C (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg without medication, complete success), criterion D (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, complete success), criterion E (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and IOP reduction > 20% after therapy), and criterion F (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and IOP reduction > 20% after therapy).

Results

In the matched cohort, the SLT cohort showed an IOP reduction of 31.2% from 19.9 ± 2.3 to 13.7 ± 2.7 mmHg (p < 0.001) 3 years postoperatively; in Trabectome^® IOP decreased by 31.4% from 20.5 ± 1.3 to 13.8 ± 2.0 mmHg (p < 0.001) and in iStent inject^® by 29.9% from 19.5 ± 2.0 to 13.8 ± 2.7 mmHg (p < 0.001). Trabectome^® and iStent inject^® could not demonstrate a significant reduction in glaucoma therapy (Trabectome^® p = 0.138, iStent inject^® p = 0.612); a significant drop was noted in SLT (2.2 ± 1.2 to 1.7 ± 1.2, p = 0.046). SLT and MIGS achieved good to moderate survival rates using criterion A (93.3% SLT, 79.7% Trabectome^®, 77.6% iStent inject^®) and criterion B (74.5% SLT, 48.0% Trabectome^®, 56.2% iStent inject^®). As expected, low survival rates were obtained with non-filtering procedures: criterion C 11.1% in SLT, 6.5% in Trabectome^®, 7.0% in iStent inject^® and criterion D 3.0% in SLT, 4.3% in Trabectome^®, 3.7% in iStent inject^® in 3-year follow-up.

Conclusion

The SLT is a low-complication and effective method for reducing pressure in mild to moderate POAG. SLT is suitable as an initial procedure when setting up a step scheme; MIGS is the treatment of choice as a follow-up for mild to moderate forms of glaucoma and accepted topical therapy. Ethic approval had been given by the Ethikkommission Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, EA4/047/20-retrospectively registered.

SUBMITTER: Pahlitzsch M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8319229 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMIGS have been developed as a surgical alternative for glaucomatous patients.PurposeTo analyze the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medications using different MIGS devices (Trabectome, iStent, Excimer Laser Trabeculotomy (ELT), iStent Supra, CyPass, XEN, Hydrus, Fugo Blade, Ab interno canaloplasty, Goniscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy) as a solo procedure or in association with phacoemulsification.MethodsRandomized control trials (RCT) and non-RCT (non randomized comparative studies, NRS, and before-after studies) were included. Studies with at least one year of follow-up in patients affected by primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma or pigmentary glaucoma were considered. Risk of Bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and the ROBINS-I tools. The main outcome was the effect of MIGS devices compared to medical therapy, cataract surgery, other glaucoma surgeries and other MIGS on both IOP and use of glaucoma medications 12 months after surgery. Outcomes measures were the mean difference in the change of IOP and glaucoma medication compared to baseline at one and two years and all ocular adverse events. The current meta-analysis is registered on PROSPERO (reference n° CRD42016037280).ResultsOver a total of 3,069 studies, nine RCT and 21 case series with a total of 2.928 eyes were included. Main concerns about risk of bias in RCTs were lack of blinding, allocation concealment and attrition bias while in non-RCTs they were represented by patients' selection, masking of participants and co-intervention management. Limited evidence was found based on both RCTs and non RCTs that compared MIGS surgery with medical therapy or other MIGS. In before-after series, MIGS surgery seemed effective in lowering both IOP and glaucoma drug use. MIGS showed a good safety profile: IOP spikes were the most frequent complications and no cases of infection or BCVA loss due to glaucoma were reported.ConclusionsAlthough MIGS seem efficient in the reduction of the IOP and glaucoma medication and show good safety profile, this evidence is mainly derived from non-comparative studies and further, good quality RCTs are warranted.

Project description:PURPOSE:To identify factors associated with intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction following selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in Afro-Caribbean people with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). DESIGN:This was a prospective stepped-wedge study. METHODS:Data were drawn from 72 Afro-Caribbean subjects with POAG participating in the ongoing West Indies Glaucoma Laser Study. Multivariable mixed-model analysis was utilized to develop a predictive model for percent IOP reduction 12 months following SLT. Putative factors (age, sex, site, baseline IOP, prior use of prostaglandin therapy, number of prewashout IOP-lowering medications, central corneal thickness, severity of glaucoma, duration of follow-up, and signs of acute postoperative inflammation) were evaluated in bivariate analysis. Factors significant at P?0.2 were included in the final model. Right and left eye data were modeled separately. RESULTS:At month 12 following SLT, mean IOP reductions in the West Indies Glaucoma Laser Study were 6.2 to 6.5?mm?Hg (29.7% to 31.0%) in right and left eyes. The only factor significant in both eyes (P=0.0005 in right eyes and P<0.0001 in left eyes) was time, with IOP reductions being greatest at month 3 and declining slightly over time through month 12. Vertical cup-disc ratio (P=0.006) and prior prostaglandin therapy (P=0.004) were significant only in right eyes, and central corneal thickness (P=0.014) was significant only in left eyes. Factors significant only unilaterally did not approach significance in fellow eyes, suggesting the possibility that these represent type 1 errors. Site (St. Lucia vs. Dominica) was not a significant factor, establishing generalizability of these treatment outcomes to a broader population of African-derived people. CONCLUSIONS:This analysis did not identify any subject-specific factors consistently predictive of therapeutic response to SLT. Of note, no factors predicted a suboptimal response. These findings favorably position SLT for broad application as primary therapy in African-derived people with POAG.