Dataset Information

Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Coformulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide Among People Living with HIV.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based antiretroviral regimens have become the recommended antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV (PLWH) who are antiretroviral-naïve or stably antiretroviral-treated. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically review the efficacy and safety of coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) among PLWH.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to compare the efficacy and safety between BIC/FTC/TAF and other antiretroviral regimens containing a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor, or integrase strand transfer inhibitor plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. A Mantel-Haenszel model was used to investigate the combination or interaction of a group of independent studies. I² was used to determine whether a fixed-effect model or random-effect model was to be used.

Results

A total of seven published randomized clinical trials including 3547 participants were analyzed; three studies were conducted in antiretroviral-naïve PLWH and four in stably antiretroviral-treated PLWH. At week 48, the efficacy with BIC/FTC/TAF was not statistically significantly different from that with control regimens [odds ratio (OR) 1.01 (95% CI 0.79, 1.30)]. BIC/FTC/TAF had comparable safety profiles to control regimens: OR for all adverse effects (AEs) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.78, 1.09); OR for any grade 3 or grade 4 AEs was 0.96 (95% CI 0.66, 1.39); and OR for treatment-related AEs was 1.31 (95% CI 0.68, 2.53).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials of antiretroviral-naïve and stably antiretroviral-treated PLWH suggests that BIC/FTC/TAF is as safe and efficacious as are its comparators at week 48. The interstudy differences in selected populations and control regimens may lead to the high heterogeneity of the meta-analysis.

SUBMITTER: Chen IW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8322367 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionShort-course preventive therapy with 1-month course of daily administration of isoniazid (300-mg) plus rifapentine (600-mg) (1HP) and 3-month course of weekly administration of isoniazid (900-mg) plus rifapentine (900-mg) (3HP) has higher completion rates than 9-month course of daily isoniazid (9H) for individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). We aimed to evaluate the effect, safety and tolerability of 1HP in people living with HIV (PLWH) and LTBI who received coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF).MethodsPLWH testing positive by interferon-gamma release assay and having received BIC/FTC/TAF for >2 weeks with plasma HIV RNA load (PVL) <200 copies/ml were enrolled. BIC trough plasma concentrations and cytokine profiles were determined before the first dose (day 1/baseline), 24 h after the 14th (day 15) and 28th (day 29) doses of 1HP. PVL were determined on days 15 and 29 of 1HP and every 3 months subsequently after discontinuation of 1HP.ResultsFrom November 2019 to December 2020, 48 PLWH with LTBI were enrolled. One participant (2.1%) discontinued 1HP on day 15 due to fever and generalized rashes with PVL of 72 copies/ml, which was <50 copies/ml in three subsequent determinations while on BIC/FTC/TAF over the 12 months of follow-up. The percentages of BIC trough plasma concentrations above the protein-adjusted 95% effective concentration (paEC95 = 162 ng/ml) were 56.3% and 37.0% on days 15 and 29, respectively. The percentage of PVL <200 copies/ml was 91.7% on day 15, 97.8% on day 29 and 100% at both months 3 and 6. After a median observation of 52 weeks (interquartile range, 51-55), all participants continued BIC/FTC/TAF with a median PVL of 20 copies/ml (range 20-331). Except for the participant who discontinued 1HP because of allergic reactions, none of the participants had relevant symptoms or increases of the cytokine levels assessed between baseline and days 15 and 29 of 1HP.ConclusionsBIC/FTC/TAF in combination with 1HP was well tolerated with a high completion rate. BIC trough plasma concentrations were significantly decreased with concurrent use of 1HP among PLWH with LTBI. While transient viral blips were observed during 1HP without causing subsequent treatment failure, such combination should be applied with caution.

Project description:Abstract Background Prospective studies examining long‐term therapeutic outcomes of the Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) regimen in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remain limited. This study assessed the actual efficacy and safety of BIC/FTC/TAF in HIV‐infected individuals in southwest China. Methods This was a single‐center, prospective study enrolling ART‐naïve (n = 32) and ART‐experienced (n = 177) HIV‐infected patients administered BIC/FTC/TAF treatment between March 2022 and August 2022. The data were collected until February 28, 2023. Virological reactions and adverse events to the treatment were recorded, and patient subjective feelings in the form of Electronic Patient Reporting Outcome (ePRO) were collected. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients with HIV viral load <50 copies/mL at Week 24. Results At Week 24, 87.5% and 95.5% of ART‐naïve and ART‐experienced HIV patients had a viral load <50 copies/mL, respectively. CD4 cell counts in ART‐naïve and ART‐experienced patients increased significantly by 163.5 cells/μL (p = .002) and 55.0 cells/μL (p = .022), respectively. By Week 24, no patients had discontinued the BIC/FTC/TAF treatment due to adverse events. Based on ePRO data, ART‐naïve and ART‐experienced patients at Week 24 had stable disease symptom burden, quality of life, and depression level after treatment with BIC/FTC/TAF. Conclusion BIC/FTC/TAF reduces the viral load in ART‐naïve patients with high viral load as well as ART‐experienced patients with residual viremia. The patient's subjective experience was maintained stable after treatment with BIC/FTC/TAF. This study also revealed a very low incidence for BIC/FTC/TAF drug‐related side effects. This study suggests BIC+FTC+TAF is a safe option for achieving and maintaining virological suppression, both in treatment‐naïve patients with high viral load and treatment‐experienced patients with baseline residual viremia. Since there were almost no drug‐related adverse events with this regimen, and patients' subjective experiences of their own disease symptom burdens, quality of life, and depression levels based on ePRO after treatment with this regimen remained stable, it can be deduced that patient compliance can be ensured. In this study, significant decreases in ALT, AST, and GLU levels were firstly detected in treatment‐naïve and treatment‐experienced patients at Week 24. In the future, the sample size and follow‐up time should be increased to confirm these findings."

Project description:Abstract Background People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and substance use disorder (PWH/SUD) are at higher risk of nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy. Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) exhibits high rates of efficacy with a favorable adverse event profile. The BASE study (NCT03998176) is a phase 4, single-arm study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of B/F/TAF among PWH/SUD. Methods Viremic (HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL) PWH/SUD initiated B/F/TAF once daily for 48 weeks (W). The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at W24. Secondary endpoints were proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at W48, safety, B/F/TAF adherence (dried blood spot [DBS] concentrations of emtricitabine triphosphate and tenofovir diphosphate [TFV-DP]), substance use (NIDA-ASSIST), and quality of life (SF-12). Results Forty-three participants were enrolled; 95% reported methamphetamine use. Median age was 38 (range, 21–62) years; 21% were female, 81% White, 14% Black, and 16% Hispanic. Thirty-two (74%) and 21 (49%) participants had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL (intention-to-treat) at W24 and W48, respectively. Seven participants (16%) experienced confirmed virologic failure through W48; 1 developed emergent drug resistance (M184V). Fifteen participants (35%) experienced grade ≥3 adverse events. Five participants (12%) reported suicidal ideation; none resulted in discontinuation. Median DBS concentrations were representative of 5–6 doses/week (TFV-DP, 1603 fmol/punches). NIDA-ASSIST scores declined from baseline to W48 with methamphetamine use decreasing most (−7.9 points; −29%), and SF-12 physical/mental scores increased 1.2 and 7.6 points, respectively. Conclusions B/F/TAF among a high-risk population of PWH/SUD resulted in an initial 72% viral suppression rate at W24 before dropping to 49% at W48 as retention declined. One participant developed emergent drug resistance (M184V). Use of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide among people with HIV and substance use disorder was safe and effective, with low rates of emergent HIV drug resistance despite incomplete adherence and declining retention to visits.

Project description:BackgroundBictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) is a single-tablet regimen recommended for HIV-1 treatment. The safety and efficacy of B/F/TAF as initial therapy was established in two Phase 3 studies: 1489 (vs dolutegravir [DTG]/abacavir/lamivudine) and 1490 (vs DTG + F/TAF). After 144 weeks of randomized follow-up, an open-label extension evaluated B/F/TAF to 240 weeks.MethodsOf 634 participants randomized to B/F/TAF, 519 completed the double-blinded treatment, and 506/634 (80%) chose the 96-week open-label B/F/TAF extension, which was completed by 444/506 (88%) participants. Efficacy was based on the secondary outcome of the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 240 by missing = excluded and missing = failure methods. All 634 participants who were randomized to B/F/TAF and received at least one dose of B/F/TAF were included in efficacy and safety analyses. (Study 1489: ClinicalTrials.govNCT02607930; EudraCT 2015-004024-54. Study 1490: ClinicalTrials.govNCT02607956; EudraCT 2015-003988-10).FindingsOf those with available virologic data, 98.6% (95% CI [97.0%-99.5%], 426/432) maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 240 (missing = excluded); when missing virologic data were considered as failure, 67.2% (95% CI [63.4%-70.8%], 426/634) maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Mean (SD) change in CD4+ count from baseline was +338 (236.2) cells/μL. No treatment-emergent resistance to B/F/TAF was detected. Adverse events led to drug discontinuation in 1.6% (n = 10/634) of participants (n = 5 with events considered drug-related). No discontinuations were due to renal adverse events. Median (IQR) total cholesterol increased 21 (1,42) mg/dL from baseline; the change in total cholesterol:HDL was 0.1 (-0.5,0.6). Median (IQR) weight change from baseline was +6.1 kg (2.0, 11.7) at Week 240. In Study 1489, hip and spine bone mineral density mean percent changes from baseline were ≤0.6%.InterpretationThrough 5 years of follow-up, B/F/TAF maintained high rates of virologic suppression with no treatment-emergent resistance and rare drug discontinuations due to adverse events. These results demonstrate the durability and safety of B/F/TAF in people with HIV.FundingGilead Sciences.

Project description:BackgroundBictegravir (B)/emtricitabine (F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is guideline-recommended treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We evaluated whether people receiving dolutegravir (DTG) plus F/TAF or F/TDF (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) with viral suppression can switch to B/F/TAF without compromising safety or efficacy, regardless of preexisting nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance.MethodsIn this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, we enrolled adults who were virologically suppressed for ≥6 months before screening (with documented/suspected NRTI resistance) or ≥3 months before screening (with no documented/suspected NRTI resistance) on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to switch to B/F/TAF or DTG + F/TAF once daily for 48 weeks, each with matching placebo. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 (snapshot algorithm); the prespecified noninferiority margin was 4%.ResultsFive hundred sixty-seven adults were randomized; 565 were treated (284 B/F/TAF, 281 DTG + F/TAF). At week 48, B/F/TAF was noninferior to DTG + F/TAF, as 0.4% (1/284) vs 1.1% (3/281) had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (difference, -0.7% [95.001% confidence interval {CI}, -2.8% to 1.0%]). There were no significant differences in efficacy among participants with suspected or confirmed prior NRTI resistance (n = 138). No participant had treatment-emergent drug resistance. Median weight change from baseline at week 48 was +1.3 kg (B/F/TAF) vs +1.1 kg (DTG + F/TAF) (P = .46). Weight change differed by baseline NRTIs (+2.2 kg [F/TDF] and +0.6 kg [F/TAF], P < .001), with no differences between B/F/TAF and DTG + F/TAF.ConclusionsThe single-tablet regimen B/F/TAF is a safe, effective option for people virologically suppressed on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF, including in individuals with preexisting resistance to NRTIs.Clinical trials registrationNCT03110380.

Project description:Abstract Background Switching to cabotegravir long-acting + rilpivirine long-acting (CAB LA + RPV LA) administered every month (Q1M) has demonstrated non-inferiority in viral suppression versus a range of standard of care (SoC) antiretroviral regimens, including tenofovir alafenamide based regimens, in two pivotal phase 3 clinical trials (ATLAS [NCT02951052] and FLAIR [NCT02938520]). Furthermore, CAB LA + RPV LA every 2 months (Q2M) has demonstrated non-inferiority in maintaining viral suppression compared with CAB LA + RPV LA Q1M in a phase 3b study (ATLAS-2M [NCT03299049]). As bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) was not widely used at study initiation, the regimen was not present in the SoC arms of ATLAS and FLAIR. The objective was to compare efficacy and safety of CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M to BIC/FTC/TAF using indirect treatment comparison. Methods Two switch studies appropriate for facilitating indirect comparison to BIC/FTC/TAF were identified via systematic literature review (Molina et al. 2018 [NCT02603120] and Sax et al. 2020 [NCT03110380]). Indirect comparison using a generalisation of Bucher’s methodology to calculate relative risk, odds ratio, and risk differences in efficacy (Week 48 HIV RNA < 50 c/mL and ≥50 c/mL per FDA Snapshot approach and CD4+ cell change from baseline) and safety (discontinuation due to adverse events [AEs] and overall and serious AEs excluding injection site reactions [ISRs]) was conducted. Results for CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M in ATLAS-2M participants with prior integrase inhibitor (INI) exposure, but without prior CAB exposure, were indirectly compared to those with prior INI use in ATLAS and FLAIR via the common CAB LA + RPV LA Q1M comparator and were then indirectly compared to BIC/FTC/TAF via the INI comparator (Figure 1). Results No statistically significant differences in virologic failure, virologic suppression, CD4+ cell change, discontinuations due to AEs, and non-ISR serious/non-serious AEs were found between CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M and BIC/FTC/TAF (Table 1). Conclusion Indirect treatment comparison indicated efficacy and safety of CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M is not different from BIC/FTC/TAF. These regimens will be further compared in a randomized head-to-head non-inferiority trial (SOLAR, NCT04542070). Disclosures Sonya J. Snedecor, PhD, ViiV Healthcare (Other Financial or Material Support, Author’s employer, OPEN Health received funding to execute this study) Melanie Schroeder, MSc, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Nicolas Van de Velde, PhD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee)