Dataset Information

Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Coformulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide Among People Living with HIV.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based antiretroviral regimens have become the recommended antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV (PLWH) who are antiretroviral-naïve or stably antiretroviral-treated. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically review the efficacy and safety of coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) among PLWH.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to compare the efficacy and safety between BIC/FTC/TAF and other antiretroviral regimens containing a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor, or integrase strand transfer inhibitor plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. A Mantel-Haenszel model was used to investigate the combination or interaction of a group of independent studies. I² was used to determine whether a fixed-effect model or random-effect model was to be used.

Results

A total of seven published randomized clinical trials including 3547 participants were analyzed; three studies were conducted in antiretroviral-naïve PLWH and four in stably antiretroviral-treated PLWH. At week 48, the efficacy with BIC/FTC/TAF was not statistically significantly different from that with control regimens [odds ratio (OR) 1.01 (95% CI 0.79, 1.30)]. BIC/FTC/TAF had comparable safety profiles to control regimens: OR for all adverse effects (AEs) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.78, 1.09); OR for any grade 3 or grade 4 AEs was 0.96 (95% CI 0.66, 1.39); and OR for treatment-related AEs was 1.31 (95% CI 0.68, 2.53).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials of antiretroviral-naïve and stably antiretroviral-treated PLWH suggests that BIC/FTC/TAF is as safe and efficacious as are its comparators at week 48. The interstudy differences in selected populations and control regimens may lead to the high heterogeneity of the meta-analysis.

SUBMITTER: Chen IW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8322367 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionShort-course preventive therapy with 1-month course of daily administration of isoniazid (300-mg) plus rifapentine (600-mg) (1HP) and 3-month course of weekly administration of isoniazid (900-mg) plus rifapentine (900-mg) (3HP) has higher completion rates than 9-month course of daily isoniazid (9H) for individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). We aimed to evaluate the effect, safety and tolerability of 1HP in people living with HIV (PLWH) and LTBI who received coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF).MethodsPLWH testing positive by interferon-gamma release assay and having received BIC/FTC/TAF for >2 weeks with plasma HIV RNA load (PVL) <200 copies/ml were enrolled. BIC trough plasma concentrations and cytokine profiles were determined before the first dose (day 1/baseline), 24 h after the 14th (day 15) and 28th (day 29) doses of 1HP. PVL were determined on days 15 and 29 of 1HP and every 3 months subsequently after discontinuation of 1HP.ResultsFrom November 2019 to December 2020, 48 PLWH with LTBI were enrolled. One participant (2.1%) discontinued 1HP on day 15 due to fever and generalized rashes with PVL of 72 copies/ml, which was <50 copies/ml in three subsequent determinations while on BIC/FTC/TAF over the 12 months of follow-up. The percentages of BIC trough plasma concentrations above the protein-adjusted 95% effective concentration (paEC95 = 162 ng/ml) were 56.3% and 37.0% on days 15 and 29, respectively. The percentage of PVL <200 copies/ml was 91.7% on day 15, 97.8% on day 29 and 100% at both months 3 and 6. After a median observation of 52 weeks (interquartile range, 51-55), all participants continued BIC/FTC/TAF with a median PVL of 20 copies/ml (range 20-331). Except for the participant who discontinued 1HP because of allergic reactions, none of the participants had relevant symptoms or increases of the cytokine levels assessed between baseline and days 15 and 29 of 1HP.ConclusionsBIC/FTC/TAF in combination with 1HP was well tolerated with a high completion rate. BIC trough plasma concentrations were significantly decreased with concurrent use of 1HP among PLWH with LTBI. While transient viral blips were observed during 1HP without causing subsequent treatment failure, such combination should be applied with caution.

Project description:BackgroundBictegravir (B)/emtricitabine (F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is guideline-recommended treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We evaluated whether people receiving dolutegravir (DTG) plus F/TAF or F/TDF (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) with viral suppression can switch to B/F/TAF without compromising safety or efficacy, regardless of preexisting nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance.MethodsIn this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, we enrolled adults who were virologically suppressed for ≥6 months before screening (with documented/suspected NRTI resistance) or ≥3 months before screening (with no documented/suspected NRTI resistance) on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to switch to B/F/TAF or DTG + F/TAF once daily for 48 weeks, each with matching placebo. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 (snapshot algorithm); the prespecified noninferiority margin was 4%.ResultsFive hundred sixty-seven adults were randomized; 565 were treated (284 B/F/TAF, 281 DTG + F/TAF). At week 48, B/F/TAF was noninferior to DTG + F/TAF, as 0.4% (1/284) vs 1.1% (3/281) had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (difference, -0.7% [95.001% confidence interval {CI}, -2.8% to 1.0%]). There were no significant differences in efficacy among participants with suspected or confirmed prior NRTI resistance (n = 138). No participant had treatment-emergent drug resistance. Median weight change from baseline at week 48 was +1.3 kg (B/F/TAF) vs +1.1 kg (DTG + F/TAF) (P = .46). Weight change differed by baseline NRTIs (+2.2 kg [F/TDF] and +0.6 kg [F/TAF], P < .001), with no differences between B/F/TAF and DTG + F/TAF.ConclusionsThe single-tablet regimen B/F/TAF is a safe, effective option for people virologically suppressed on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF, including in individuals with preexisting resistance to NRTIs.Clinical trials registrationNCT03110380.

Project description:Abstract Background Switching to cabotegravir long-acting + rilpivirine long-acting (CAB LA + RPV LA) administered every month (Q1M) has demonstrated non-inferiority in viral suppression versus a range of standard of care (SoC) antiretroviral regimens, including tenofovir alafenamide based regimens, in two pivotal phase 3 clinical trials (ATLAS [NCT02951052] and FLAIR [NCT02938520]). Furthermore, CAB LA + RPV LA every 2 months (Q2M) has demonstrated non-inferiority in maintaining viral suppression compared with CAB LA + RPV LA Q1M in a phase 3b study (ATLAS-2M [NCT03299049]). As bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) was not widely used at study initiation, the regimen was not present in the SoC arms of ATLAS and FLAIR. The objective was to compare efficacy and safety of CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M to BIC/FTC/TAF using indirect treatment comparison. Methods Two switch studies appropriate for facilitating indirect comparison to BIC/FTC/TAF were identified via systematic literature review (Molina et al. 2018 [NCT02603120] and Sax et al. 2020 [NCT03110380]). Indirect comparison using a generalisation of Bucher’s methodology to calculate relative risk, odds ratio, and risk differences in efficacy (Week 48 HIV RNA < 50 c/mL and ≥50 c/mL per FDA Snapshot approach and CD4+ cell change from baseline) and safety (discontinuation due to adverse events [AEs] and overall and serious AEs excluding injection site reactions [ISRs]) was conducted. Results for CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M in ATLAS-2M participants with prior integrase inhibitor (INI) exposure, but without prior CAB exposure, were indirectly compared to those with prior INI use in ATLAS and FLAIR via the common CAB LA + RPV LA Q1M comparator and were then indirectly compared to BIC/FTC/TAF via the INI comparator (Figure 1). Results No statistically significant differences in virologic failure, virologic suppression, CD4+ cell change, discontinuations due to AEs, and non-ISR serious/non-serious AEs were found between CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M and BIC/FTC/TAF (Table 1). Conclusion Indirect treatment comparison indicated efficacy and safety of CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M is not different from BIC/FTC/TAF. These regimens will be further compared in a randomized head-to-head non-inferiority trial (SOLAR, NCT04542070). Disclosures Sonya J. Snedecor, PhD, ViiV Healthcare (Other Financial or Material Support, Author’s employer, OPEN Health received funding to execute this study) Melanie Schroeder, MSc, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Nicolas Van de Velde, PhD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee)

Project description:ObjectivesStudies 1878 and 1844 demonstrated non-inferior efficacy of switching suppressed HIV-1-infected adults to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) versus continuing boosted PI-based triple regimens or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC). Here, detailed analyses of pre-existing resistance in the two BIC/FTC/TAF switch studies and efficacy at week 48 are described.MethodsPre-existing resistance was assessed from historical genotypes (documented resistance to study drugs was excluded) and by retrospective baseline proviral archive DNA genotyping from whole blood. Outcomes were based on HIV-1 RNA at week 48 with missing values imputed using the last on-treatment observation carried forward method.ResultsCumulative pre-existing resistance data from historical and proviral genotypes were obtained for 95% (543/570) of participants who switched to BIC/FTC/TAF. Altogether, 40% (217/543) had one or more pre-existing primary resistance substitutions in protease, reverse transcriptase and/or integrase. Pre-switch NRTI resistance was detected in 16% (89/543) of BIC/FTC/TAF-treated participants, with M184V or M184I detected by proviral genotyping in 10% (54/543). At week 48, 98% (561/570) of all BIC/FTC/TAF-treated participants versus 98% (213/217) with pre-existing resistance and 96% (52/54) with archived M184V/I had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. No BIC/FTC/TAF-treated participants developed treatment-emergent resistance to study drugs.ConclusionsPre-existing resistance substitutions, notably M184V/I, were unexpectedly common among suppressed participants who switched to BIC/FTC/TAF. High rates of virological suppression were maintained in the overall study population and in those with pre-existing resistance, including M184V/I, for up to 48 weeks of BIC/FTC/TAF treatment with no resistance development. These results indicate that BIC/FTC/TAF is an effective treatment option for suppressed patients, including those with evidence of archived NRTI resistance.

Project description:A fixed-dose combination consisting of darunavir (Drv), cobicistat (Cobi), emtricitabine (2',3'-dideoxy-5-fluoro-3'-thiacytidine [FTC]), and tenofovir alafenamide (Taf) has been recently approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of HIV infection, and is the first ever protease-inhibitor-based single-tablet regimen. This article provides a detailed description of its pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and safety profile. The pharmacokinetics of single compounds were analyzed, with a special focus on contrasts between Drv/Cobi and Drv/ritonavir (Rtv). When comparing Cobi and Rtv, multiple interactions must be taken into account: in comparison to Rtv, Cobi is a more selective CYP3A4 inhibitor and has no clinical effect on other isoenzymes inhibited by Rtv (eg, 2C8 and 2C9). Moreover, unlike Cobi, Rtv shows in vivo induction activity on some CYP isoenzymes (eg, 1A2, 2C19, 2C8, 2C9, and 2B6), glucuronyltransferases (eg, UGT1A4), and Pgp. Drv-Cobi-FTC-Taf has recently been demonstrated to be of equal efficacy to Drv-Rtv and other protease inhibitors in both experienced (EMERALD study) and naïve (AMBER study) patients. Moreover, kidney and bone safety profiles have been shown to be good, as has central nervous system tolerance. Total cholesterol:low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol:high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratios are generally high in Drv-Cobi-FTC-Taf vs Rtv-Drv-FTC + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. An unlikely role of Drv in influencing cardiovascular risk in HIV infection has also been reported. Kidney safety profile is influenced by Cobi, with an increase in creatinine plasma concentration of 0.05-0.1 mg/dL and a parallel glomerular filtration-rate reduction of 10 mL/min within the first 4 weeks after Cobi introduction, which remains stable during treatment. Bone and central nervous system safety profiles were found to be good in randomized clinical trials of both experienced and naïve patients. The efficacy and safety of Drv/Cobi/FTC/Taf are comparable to other drug regimens recommended for HIV treatment.