Dataset Information

European hemodialysis patient satisfaction with phosphate binders is associated with serum phosphorus levels: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are commonly prescribed phosphate binders (PBs) to manage serum phosphorus levels, as hyperphosphatemia is strongly associated with poorer survival. Nonadherence with the PB prescription is associated with elevated serum phosphorus levels. We studied associations between patient satisfaction with their PB and serum phosphorus levels and mortality rates.

Methods

Adult HD patients in Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study were administered a survey instrument in late 2017. Patients were asked about their satisfaction with their PBs, as measured through three questions (difficulty, inconvenience and dissatisfaction) on a 5-point Likert scale, with each dichotomized into average worst versus good responses. These were used as predictors in linear regression models of continuous serum phosphorus levels and in Cox proportional hazards models of mortality, with adjustments for demographics, comorbidities and laboratory values.

Results

Patients having greater difficulty, inconvenience and dissatisfaction with their PB had higher serum phosphorus levels in adjusted models {+0.21 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI) ±0.23], +0.30 (±0.21) and 0.36 (±0.22), respectively}, and higher odds of having serum phosphorus levels ≥6.0 mg/dL. Measures of dissatisfaction were also associated with an elevated risk of mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios of 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-3.6), 1.6 (1.0-2.6) and 1.7 (1.1-2.7), respectively; this association was not strongly affected by adjustment for baseline serum phosphorous level.

Conclusions

Self-reported difficulty, inconvenience and dissatisfaction in taking one's prescribed PBs were associated with elevated serum phosphorus levels and serum phosphorus levels above clinically meaningful thresholds. While the mechanism for the association with mortality is unclear, patient-reported satisfaction should be considered when attempting to manage patient serum phosphorus levels.

SUBMITTER: McCullough K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8323136 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundStudies evaluating the change in serum phosphate post hemodialysis (HD) demonstrate an initial decline during dialysis but a rebound post dialysis. However, previous studies were done on usual diet and phosphate binders, with limited number of blood draws, confounding conclusions. We determined serum phosphate reduction, rebound, and equilibrium over 48 h in HD patients consuming a controlled, low phosphorus diet without binders.MethodsSerum phosphate (mg/dL) was analyzed before and after a HD treatment and frequently during the ensuing 48 h intradialytic period in the clinical research unit. Thirteen subjects were enrolled and had been off phosphate binders for 10 days and consumed a standardized low phosphate (900 mg/day) diet for 3 weeks prior to the assessments. Linear regression was used to determine relationships between the pre-HD serum phosphate, decline post-HD (post-HD drop); and a 48 h area under curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal method as a measure of overall phosphate levels from the end of dialysis to 48 h post dialysis. Repeated Measures ANOVA with Dunnett's posthoc test was used to determine rebound.ResultsFive of 13 subjects returned to >90% of their pre-HD serum phosphate within the first 24 h post-HD, and serum phosphate was 94 ± 0.11% (range 63%-113%) by 48 h after the completion of HD. The 48 h AUC of serum phosphate during the interdialytic period was correlated with both pre dialysis phosphorus (r = 0.85; p = 0.0002) and the pre-post drop in serum phosphate during dialysis (r = 0.69; p = 0.0085). In contrast, the net ultrafiltration was not related to the 48 h AUC of serum phosphorus (r = 0.20; p = 0.51).ConclusionsIn hemodialysis patients on standard low phosphorus diet and no phosphate binders, the interdialytic serum phosphorus level, assessed as AUC, is determined by the pre dialysis phosphorus and net-change in serum phosphorus during the dialysis treatment, but not the ultrafiltration volume [Correction added on 25 January, after first online publication: In the last sentence of the Abstract, the word "potassium" has been replaced with "phosphorus" to improve accuracy.].

Project description:BackgroundSudden death is a leading cause of death in patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy. During hemodialysis sessions, the gradient between serum and dialysate levels results in rapid electrolyte shifts, which may contribute to arrhythmias and sudden death. Controversies exist about the optimal electrolyte concentration in the dialysate; specifically, it is unclear whether patient outcomes differ among those treated with a dialysate potassium concentration of 3 mEq/L compared to 2 mEq/L.Study designProspective cohort study.Setting & participants55,183 patients from 20 countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) phases 1 to 5 (1996-2015).PredictorDialysate potassium concentration at study entry.OutcomesCox regression was used to estimate the association between dialysate potassium concentration and both all-cause mortality and an arrhythmia composite outcome (arrhythmia-related hospitalization or sudden death), adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 16.5 months, 24% of patients died and 7% had an arrhythmia composite outcome. No meaningful difference in clinical outcomes was observed for patients treated with a dialysate potassium concentration of 3 versus 2 mEq/L (adjusted HRs were 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91-1.01] for mortality and 0.98 [95% CI, 0.88-1.08] for arrhythmia composite). Results were similar across predialysis serum potassium levels. As in prior studies, higher serum potassium level was associated with adverse outcomes. However, dialysate potassium concentration had only minimal impact on serum potassium level measured predialysis (+0.09 [95% CI, 0.05-0.14] mEq/L serum potassium per 1 mEq/L greater dialysate potassium concentration).LimitationsData were not available for delivered (vs prescribed) dialysate potassium concentration and postdialysis serum potassium level; possible unmeasured confounding.ConclusionsIn combination, these results suggest that approaches other than altering dialysate potassium concentration (eg, education on dietary potassium sources and prescription of potassium-binding medications) may merit further attention to reduce risks associated with high serum potassium levels.

Project description:Rationale & Objective Despite α-blockers’ use for hypertension as add-on therapy in patients treated with hemodialysis, scant information is available on their association, particularly with safety, in these patients. Study Design Prospective cohort study. Setting & Participants patients treated with hemodialysis and receiving antihypertensive agents in the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study, phases 4-6, were analyzed. Exposure Primary exposure was the prescription of α-blocking antihypertensive agents at baseline. Outcomes Incident fractures, falls, and all-cause mortality. Analytical Approach Multivariable Cox and modified Poisson regression analysis. Results Of 5,149 patients treated with hemodialysis (mean age, 65 years; 68% men) receiving antihypertensive drugs, 717 (14%) received α-blocking agents. During a mean follow-up period of 2.0 years, 247 fractures, 525 falls, and 498 deaths occurred. Multivariable analysis showed no significant association of α-blocker use and increased risk of fractures (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.61-1.38]), falls (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.74-1.20]), or all-cause deaths (HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.64-1.20]) compared with α-blocker nonuse. α-Blocker use was, however, significantly associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality in the subgroup analysis, for example, patients who were older (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.51-0.99]), were women (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.48-0.95]), or reported a history of cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.48-0.95]) or a predialysis blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.49-0.98]). Limitations Selection bias cannot be ruled out given the prevalent user analysis. Conclusions No significant association between α-blocker use and the risk of worse safety-related outcomes was seen, indicating that clinicians may safely prescribe α-blockers to patients receiving hemodialysis who require blood pressure lowering. Plain-Language Summary α-Blockers have been generally reserved for use as add-on therapy for resistant or refractory hypertension. However, little is known about the safety of α-blockers in patients treated by hemodialysis. We analyzed 5,149 patients receiving hemodialysis in Japan who were receiving antihypertensive drugs from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. The results showed no significant increase in the risk of fractures, falls, or deaths for patients using α-blockers compared with those who did not, suggesting that α-blockers may be safely prescribed for patients receiving hemodialysis who need to lower their blood pressure.

Project description:Poor nutritional status and both hyper- and hypophosphatemia are associated with increased mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients. We assessed associations of phosphate binder prescription with survival and indicators of nutritional status in maintenance HD patients.Prospective cohort study (DOPPS [Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study]), 1996-2008.23,898 maintenance HD patients at 923 facilities in 12 countries.Patient-level phosphate binder prescription and case-mix-adjusted facility percentage of phosphate binder prescription using an instrumental-variable analysis.All-cause mortality.Overall, 88% of patients were prescribed phosphate binders. Distributions of age, comorbid conditions, and other characteristics showed small differences between facilities with higher and lower percentages of phosphate binder prescription. Patient-level phosphate binder prescription was associated strongly at baseline with indicators of better nutrition, ie, higher values for serum creatinine, albumin, normalized protein catabolic rate, and body mass index and absence of cachectic appearance. Overall, patients prescribed phosphate binders had 25% lower mortality (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.83) when adjusted for serum phosphorus level and other covariates; further adjustment for nutritional indicators attenuated this association (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97). However, this inverse association was observed for only patients with serum phosphorus levels ?3.5 mg/dL. In the instrumental-variable analysis, case-mix-adjusted facility percentage of phosphate binder prescription (range, 23%-100%) was associated positively with better nutritional status and inversely with mortality (HR for 10% more phosphate binders, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96). Further adjustment for nutritional indicators reduced this association to an HR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99).Results were based on phosphate binder prescription; phosphate binder and nutritional data were cross-sectional; dietary restriction was not assessed; observational design limits causal inference due to possible residual confounding.Longer survival and better nutritional status were observed for maintenance HD patients prescribed phosphate binders and in facilities with a greater percentage of phosphate binder prescription. Understanding the mechanisms for explaining this effect and ruling out possible residual confounding require additional research.